Supreme Court turns down inappropriate content group’s plea to block Texas age-verification law

[Michie]

The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday declined a request from the inappropriate content industry to block a Texas age-verification rule, allowing the law to stand and temporarily derailing the efforts of inappropriate content creators to see the new safety measure scuttled.

The court said in an unsigned order without comment that it was denying a request from the Free Speech Coalition to issue a stay on the law. The Free Speech Coalition includes a inappropriate content trade association and several inappropriate contentography creators.

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton has defended the law, HB 1181, since its passage last summer. The measure requires inappropriate content websites to institute “reasonable age-verification methods” to ensure minors are not accessing explicit sexual content on their sites.

The attorney general has sued multiple inappropriate contentography companies in order to enforce the age-verification law. He argued earlier this year that inappropriate contentography sites “are on the run because Texas has a law that aims to prevent them from showing harmful, obscene material to children.”

Continued below.

https://www.catholicnewsagency.com/...up-s-plea-to-block-texas-age-verification-law

 

[Michie]

I really wish that word was not censored.

 

[DJWhalen]

I really wish that word was not censored.

Me too.

 

[Michie]

Me too.

It’s a pain for sure.

 

[RileyG]

Good! That site is trash and should be banned.

 

[RileyG]

It’s a pain for sure.

I guess it might be triggering for some people?

 

[Michie]

I guess it might be triggering for some people?

Well the word is all over the place and in Christian articles. A word triggering? Is there a better term for what it is?

 

[RileyG]

Well the word is all over the place and in Christian article. A word triggering? Is there a better term for what it is?

I’m not sure. I really don’t know.

 

[Michie]

Sexploitation?

Vulgar smut?

Exploited Sex trafficking actors for our personal enjoyment?

Indecent lust driven filth factories?

I don’t know either but as long as p-orn is mentioned the link is dead.

 

[RileyG]

Sexploitation?

Vulgar smut?

Exploited Sex trafficking actors for our personal enjoyment?

Indecent lust driven filth factories?

I don’t know either but as long as p-orn is mentioned the link is dead.

Some people may have addiction problems and that's why p*rn is blocked. That's my best guess. I really don't know for sure.

 

[Michie]

Some people may have addiction problems and that's why p*rn is blocked. That's my best guess. I really don't know for sure.

Well there are a lot of good articles where we are making headway defeating this scourge and the reader has to search it out themselves.