- Jun 18, 2006
- 3,851,480
- 51,562
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Baptist
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Republican
I kinda doubt it ever was a theory. More like a folk belief.
-- Wow.
Don't put people on IGNORE, people.
Just don't.
Upvote
0
I kinda doubt it ever was a theory. More like a folk belief.
Welcome back @FrumiousBandersnatch! (Aside: I'm curious about whether you may have completed that Philosophy course you mentioned you were contemplating in the past?)Correct. Mike Tyson was the heavyweight boxing champion. He isn't now.
Spontaneous generation was a scientific theory. It isn't now - as I said.
Don't wear out your spade.
Try making a useful contribution .. One never knows how that might change the status-quo.-- Wow.
Don't put people on IGNORE, people.
Just don't.
Try making a useful contribution ..
Unknown .. Its a hypothetical resolvable only by yourself.Would you know it if I did?
Yes, it was apparently taken as '(proto)scientific' fact even before the Ancient Greeks. Although a form of hypothesis testing was established in Socratic times, some such 'facts' survived unscathed even through the scientific revolution of the 16th century. We tend to overlook things that have 'always been taken for granted' until there is some compelling reason to question them!I kinda doubt it ever was a theory. More like a folk
belief.
Lucretius describes spontaneous generationYes, it was apparently taken as '(proto)scientific' fact even before the Ancient Greeks. Although a form of hypothesis testing was established in Socratic times, some such 'facts' survived unscathed even through the scientific revolution of the 16th century. We tend to overlook things that have 'always been taken for granted' until there is some compelling reason to question them!
Lucretius describes spontaneous generation incl single bones or leaves, in explaining fossils.
A widely accepted folk belief is not a theory.
Thank you - I may just be visiting, I'm not sure how much time I'll have.Welcome back @FrumiousBandersnatch! (Aside: I'm curious about whether you may have completed that Philosophy course you mentioned you were contemplating in the past?)
Spontaneous Generation and Origin of Life have the idea of life from non-life in common, but are otherwise quite different. Also, the Origin of Life hypothesis raises fundamental questions that Spontaneous Generation can't, such as the definition of life itself.Parts of the essence of the old hypothesis of Spontaneous Generation are visible in modern day Origin of Life hypotheses. It also, (obviously), spurred on Pasteur etal's paradigm shifting research in the 19th Century. In that sense, it served a highly useful purpose in the development of modern day science.
I'm not surprised you THINK it is mislabelled; you don't understand what a theory is.Gravity is gravity.
It is what it is.
Whoever called it a "theory" has, in my opinion, mislabeled it.
In short, there is no "theory of gravity."
I'm not surprised you THINK it is mislabelled; you don't understand what a theory is.
Wow! The ENTIRE world's definition of theory has to be hinged on whether the evidence is supported to AV1611VET's satisfaction?A theory is a belief in something that has been supported to your satisfaction by evidence, and is pending change.
Not by common definitions of theory and belief. You can believe that a theory is the best available or current explanation without believing the theory. Living with uncertainty is part of what makes a good scientistA theory is a belief in something that has been supported to your satisfaction by evidence, and is pending change.
Well, you got the pending change part right, at least. That's something.A theory is a belief in something that has been supported to your satisfaction by evidence, and is pending change.
Possibility of change. Possibility.Well, you got the pending change part right, at least. That's something.
Wow! The ENTIRE world's definition of theory has to be hinged on whether the evidence is supported to AV1611VET's satisfaction?
Well, you got the pending change part right, at least. That's something.
A theory is a belief in something that has been supported to your satisfaction by evidence, and is pending change.
Well, I assume the "your" was communal and not just MINE. I mean, what if I haven't studied the area of expertise? Why should my opinion count at ALL?Do you see my name in there?
Possibility of change. Possibility.
So no, not right.