When the universities talked and deescalated with protesters, no violence.When people feel they have the right to break the law, force may be required to deal with it.
Of COURSE it is. Because American police don't know how to de-escalate. Other posters have asked "what training is missing from American police today"....well, it's either de-escalation training or the idea of using the law as a hammer to solve problems.When the universities talked and deescalated with protesters, no violence.
When the universities call the police to clear the campus, violence.
I think calling the police is a part of the cause of violence, not the result.
The problem here is the unlawful acts by a mob hiding under the cloak of free speech. Law breakers have to face the police, that is just how it is.When the universities talked and deescalated with protesters, no violence.
When the universities call the police to clear the campus, violence.
I think calling the police is a part of the cause of violence, not the result.
Are we talking about "rule by The Law" (police) or "the rule of law"?So the rule of law is not so important here?
This is not a police problem this is organized chaos funded by liberal big money.Of COURSE it is. Because American police don't know how to de-escalate. Other posters have asked "what training is missing from American police today"....well, it's either de-escalation training or the idea of using the law as a hammer to solve problems.
Most of the violence starts after the police show up, or the university leadership puts their foot down and ignores the book for dealing with protests. There is a well-worked plan for de-escalating protests, and some of the universities have thrown that book out the window.The problem here is the unlawful acts by a mob hiding under the cloak of free speech. Law breakers have to face the police, that is just how it is.
The protesters do not have the right to threaten or attack Jewish students, impede their movement, prevent them from classrooms. Many protesters are not even students. This is way beyond a lawful protest, this funded chaos.Are we talking about "rule by The Law" (police) or "the rule of law"?
There is more to the "rule of law" than enforcing certain regulations.
At least 2 universities (including Indiana U.) changed their "camping policies" for students to prohibit encampments that already existed and sent in the police the next day. As others have noted, many of these protests have ended peacefully when the university and the government officials want it to.
The permissibility of the police initiating violent confrontation under the "rule of law" is slim to none.
I just watched a live report where protesters removed a barricade and advanced towards the police. The police are not the problem here. This unlawful hate filled protest is the problem.Most of the violence starts after the police show up, or the university leadership puts their foot down and ignores the book for dealing with protests. There is a well-worked plan for de-escalating protests, and some of the universities have thrown that book out the window.
I do not support the violence some of the protesters have done, but in nearly every instance there was police harassment or violence first.
I like that cite about 3 seconds worth of video of one protests and now you say with complete confidence that the police are not a problem.I just watched a live report where protesters removed a barricade and advanced towards the police. The police are not the problem here. This unlawful hate filled protest is the problem.
I think you are looking at it too narrowly. By the time the police are there on campus, it is too late. There is going to be violence.I just watched a live report where protesters removed a barricade and advanced towards the police. The police are not the problem here. This unlawful hate filled protest is the problem.
Police are not THE problem here illegal hate filled rioting is the problem.I like that cite about 3 seconds worth of video of one protests and now you say with complete confidence that the police are not a problem.
Yes campus authorities do have some responsibility here but mostly from inaction and poor decisions.I think you are looking at it too narrowly. By the time the police are there on campus, it is too late. There is going to be violence.
The colleges and universities could have de-escalated this by listening to the protesters' demands, agreeing to a few, or not and going over why not. Several colleges have done that. Heck, even Evergreen State College manager to get the protesters off their lawn without police violence.
More reading:
Here's What Universities Always Get Wrong about Student Protests
Repression draws attention to campus protests, like those over the conflict in Gaza, and makes them growwww.scientificamerican.com
The lessons from colleges that didn’t call the police
Deescalating conflict around protests was possible, but many colleges turned to law enforcement instead.www.vox.com
If police are not the problem here, it's easy to resolve that:Police are not THE problem here illegal hate filled rioting is the problem.
Were the police involved in the takeover of buildings through force and temporarily holding some staff hostage? No! But the police did take back the building. Why all of the support for this hate filled illegal protest?If police are not the problem here, it's easy to resolve that:
When police engaged, how often has there been violence?
When police do not get involved and other parties communicate directly, has there been violence?
These are two very simple questions to that can clarify the efficacy of police response.