Natural events happen in the world as a result of natural laws; I see no rational benefit in attributing praise or blame for them, although there may be some emotional comfort in superstitious attribution of praise or blame to imaginary powers or forces.Not necessarily in just a superficial causal way. I'm getting more at ultimate responsibility. What should be praised or blamed for the various events, good and bad, that happen in our lives?
I'm not a great fan of ideas of attributing moral responsibility for human action, except to the extent that it has demonstrable future social benefits, i.e. it encourages beneficial actions, or deters from harmful actions. Evidence suggests that blame is not particularly effective in this respect, and can be counter-productive; there are more effective ways of modifying behaviour to social benefit, although they may require some sublimation of the desires for revenge and/or retribution. Praise does have the benefit of a feel-good factor for both praiser and praised.
I think individuals should take greater personal responsibility for their actions, acknowledging that there are known risks - predictable and unpredictable, and unknown risks, in life. This might go some way to mitigating the individual's desire to blame. There are usually ways an individual can reduce potential risk, but there is a pragmatic balance, and risk can't be eliminated.
Last edited:
Upvote
0