Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Taking Questions on Embedded Age Creation
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Loudmouth" data-source="post: 68976498" data-attributes="member: 11790"><p>Just to recap, you claim that age was embedded only during the creation week, and God did not plant fossils in the ground as part of creating the Earth. With those two facts established, we can show that the 4.5 billion year age of the Earth is real and not the result of embedded age.</p><p></p><p>Since the Earth did not start with fossils already in the ground, those fossils had to form after there was already life on Earth. Since there is only 1 day between the creation of land animals and the end of the creation week, I think we can safely say that the fossil record started after the creation week. Therefore, any lava flows we find that are above fossils in that local geologic column also had to occur after the creation week.</p><p></p><p>As it turns out, we can date lava flows using radiometric dating. Since the conditions you set on embedded age, these lava flows could not have embedded age in them. They formed after the creation week. Therefore, we know that the radiometric clocks in the rocks started at zero with no age embedded in them. For some rocks, we find hundreds of millions of years of real radioactive decay history. </p><p></p><p>Young earth disproven.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Loudmouth, post: 68976498, member: 11790"] Just to recap, you claim that age was embedded only during the creation week, and God did not plant fossils in the ground as part of creating the Earth. With those two facts established, we can show that the 4.5 billion year age of the Earth is real and not the result of embedded age. Since the Earth did not start with fossils already in the ground, those fossils had to form after there was already life on Earth. Since there is only 1 day between the creation of land animals and the end of the creation week, I think we can safely say that the fossil record started after the creation week. Therefore, any lava flows we find that are above fossils in that local geologic column also had to occur after the creation week. As it turns out, we can date lava flows using radiometric dating. Since the conditions you set on embedded age, these lava flows could not have embedded age in them. They formed after the creation week. Therefore, we know that the radiometric clocks in the rocks started at zero with no age embedded in them. For some rocks, we find hundreds of millions of years of real radioactive decay history. Young earth disproven. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Taking Questions on Embedded Age Creation
Top
Bottom