- Dec 28, 2019
- 3,216
- 786
- 77
- Country
- Germany
- Faith
- Catholic
- Marital Status
- Married
It is too early to say what has happened but experts have offered several of the most likely scenarios, from becoming tangled in wreckage of the Titanic, to a power failure or an issue with the sub’s communications system.
Not just any shipwreck, but the most well-viewed shipwreck that ever shipwrecked. There's even a VR simulation both of the intact ship and of the wreck. Costs a lot less than 250k, too.I hope theyre ok down there and can get hoisted up.
That said, I dont understand taking all that risk to view..... a shipwreck.
Interesting video of the "submarine". Seems like this disaster was bound to happen sooner or later. Hopefully this will lead to tighter regulation on such things.
The scenario most feared is that the vessel suffered a catastrophic failure. At such depth, a hull breach would be devastating. “If something’s gone wrong, there’s a good chance it’s gone very wrong,” said Williams. “If the pressure vessel has failed catastrophically, it’s like a small bomb going off. The potential is that all the safety devices might be destroyed in the process.”
Such a fate would probably trigger signals in military hydrophones that are deployed throughout the world’s oceans. When an Argentine submarine was lost in 2017, hydrophones off Ascension Island and the Crozet Islands detected an acoustic signal consistent with a catastrophic failure of the submarine. “Just knowing where the vessel is is a big consideration,” said Williams. “The best case scenario is that the vessel has popped up and can be found visually or with radar.”
Yeah, I'm mind boggled over people paying $250,000 dollars to get in something like that which only has a single tiny porthole to see anything from. I'm not claustrophobic. But getting in something like that to go to the bottom of the ocean, wouldn't be on my to do list, even if I was given a free ticket.I hope theyre ok down there and can get hoisted up.
That said, I dont understand taking all that risk to view..... a shipwreck.
Never ever!Yeah, I'm mind boggled over people paying $250,000 dollars to get in something like that which only has a single tiny porthole to see anything from. I'm not claustrophobic. But getting in something like that to go to the bottom of the ocean, wouldn't be on my to do list, even if I was given a free ticket.
Probably because only 30 people died. Also, it was destroyed by a mine in wartime, which is pretty much an expected event.I don't understand peoples obsession with the Titanic. There's an identical ocean liner called the Britannic which sank in 1916. By comparison hardly anyone pays attention to it or even knows about it.
Personally I don't see how that makes a difference between the sunken ruins of two identical ships.Probably because only 30 people died. Also, it was destroyed by a mine in wartime, which is pretty much an expected event.
I don't see the attraction of visiting either wreck, so I can only speculate on the motivation of someone who wants to visit one of the wrecks, but not the other. But consider the following things that make the titanic wreck more interesting:Personally I don't see how that makes a difference between the sunken ruins of two identical ships.