- Mar 17, 2015
- 17,269
- 9,237
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Married
Ah, just make fewer assumptions about the thoughts of other people.I think that you are confusing a couple things.
Not everything, has to be analyzed from the standpoint of a religious discussion.
The modern scientific theory of evolution, is based on
1. random mutation
2 natural selection.
(There are other emerging models....)
Obviously, this model of evolution is not a religious theology.
Apparently, this offends you.
But there is not need to be offended, because some model is not a religious model.
The Intelligent Design authors analyze the scientific theory of evolution,
specifically using mathematics and probability. ("Randomness" is a mathematical
concept.)
And the ID authors conclude that the modern theory of evolution, is not
mathematically feasible. Because, randomness is not powerful enough to
produce the complex, specified information that we see in the biological
world.
There is no need to be offended, that the ID argument is not an explicitly
religious argument. (But, apparently, you are.)
You should CERTAINLY NOT conclude that the ID authors are not
Christians. Most of them are.
Here I was surprised in that you actually have a 0% rate of correct guesses at my thoughts and attitudes and viewpoints (*), which is significant I think.
Normally a person might guess some things wrong if they make guesses about some other person's attitudes/views/thoughts, but when someone gets everything incorrect, that's something you really should consider -- you should try to figure out what's going wrong in your own thinking about other people.
---------
*
- 'Not everything, has to be analyzed from the standpoint of a religious discussion.' -- Of course I don't at all analyze everything/each topic as religious -- posting hundreds of posts about interesting non religious science things, as a look at my last 40 or 50 posts ought to show in abundance I expect.
- "Obviously, this model of evolution is not a religious theology.
Apparently, this offends you." -- I'm not simply unoffended, but it's a form of ad hominem to try to paint me as offended (by something that in reality I enjoy). Imagine if someone accused you of being offended by science topics -- without any basis but their own internal wrong ideas of other people. - etc.
Upvote
0