I've got some more replies from Dr. Shea,
Here is my second initial e-mail to him:
Hello,
I heard about the Chinese endeavors... I know the Liberals seem to be
denouncing them... at least from what I saw on the main National
Geographic site, there was one woman in the comments who was claiming,
"The so-called discovery of Noah's Ark on Mt. Ararat by NAMI is a
fraud. Those of us who conduct tourism business on Mt. Ararat are well
aware of this fraud by Parasut and the Chinese. Evidence is online at
mountainararattrek.com/ark . Particularly, read about Joel David
Klenck, NAMI's 'expert' who is a fraud and an outright liar. Over 2200
FaceBook members of a webpage are working to expose this fraud. People
on four continents are stepping forward to provide facts of the
fraud." Source:
Noah's Ark Found in Turkey?
Anyway, I know the truth of the flood, as a true Christian I have no
doubt that Noah existed. And I know it would have been somewhere in
that area. Anyway, from what you're saying, it could be plausible that
the tombs are up on Ararat. My only question is, granted the Ark was
probably still together by the time Noah died, but I don't understand
why he would have wanted to be buried where the ark was at, unless he
loved the ship so much...
Anyway, my address is:
If you're willing to, would you give me permission to copy and share
your findings with my former professors at Bob Jones University? I'm
sure they would absolutely be fascinated as well with this.
Thanks,
Here are his two replies:
5 reasons why it is not a fraud:
1. Physical impossibility of carrying a truckload of wood up the mountain
2. Turkish army base of 10,000 soldiers at Dougbayazit wouldn't have permitted it
3. If they did get some of the wood up the mtn the Kurds would have stolen it
4. The impossibility of building it under the rock and ice if you did get the wood up the mtn undisturbed
5. Identifying carvings on the rocks outside of the tombs and on the wooden panels in the antechambers to the tombs.
The chinese have been removed from the permit and the dutch have taken over. the problem with both the chinese and the dutch is that they are looking for Noahs ark and only Noah's ark but dont consider any other possibilities. The wood may have been pirated from the ark but it is not part of the ark at present. Not the Ark because they are separated, they are tombs. Regards, Bill
Second e-mail:
thanks for the references. I think that they buried so high, not because of affection for the ark, but because of having been through the flood experience. A very high burial would be a very safe one. will get the paper in the mail first part of next week. Quite alright to share with anybody you wish, including your Bob Jones professors. P. S. the dutch were supposed to climb there in November of 2011, but I havent heard from them since 9/30/11 so I dont know whether they made it or not. Their outfit is known a Ark-in-Sight and their director is Gerrit Ahlen. I think that there are web sites for both. I think it was the Turks who discharged the chinese as they told me personally that they did not get a permit for 2010. Regards again, Bill
My reply e-mail:
Excellent, thank-you for your time. These finds make me excited not
only because of the fact that it helps to confirm Noah and the Ark
(not that I'm doubting the fact of the flood), but because it's so
much like Indiana Jones
Anyway, my Father brought up a good point about this... he is of the
impression that the Ark would have been made out of some type of
reed... (the idea of an ancient fiberglass setup... the reeds and the
pitch to put it together).... or do you think the ship could have been
a hybrid with a reed hull and wood for the interior?
Again, thank you for your time,