It's time for the US to lift the Cuban Embargo

Should the US lift the Cuban embargo?

  • Yes!

  • No!


Results are only viewable after voting.
Status
Not open for further replies.

gop_ryan

Active Member
Jul 30, 2004
188
12
38
United States
Visit site
✟373.00
Faith
Anglican
Politics
US-Republican
Ordering a total exclusion zone does not give anyone the right to shoot down an aircraft or sink a cruise ship. Instead it gives the order to force them to turn back. This can be easily done. Another mehtod of enforcing the total exclusion zone is by preventing the use of American sovereign area by vessels that enter Cuba. Canadian airliners will have to fly around the United States if they want to visit Cuba now or ships sailing to Havana will not allowed to enter American ports. Now if a vessel enters the exclusion zone, the Coast Guard should send commandoes to gain control of the ship in a peaceful manner and take it to the nearest American port so those on the vessel can be repatrionated.
 
Upvote 0

jgarden

Senior Veteran
Jan 1, 2004
10,695
3,181
✟106,405.00
Faith
Methodist
gop_ryan said:
Throwing money people does not solve the problem. It seems that liberals always answer a problem with more money............

"Throwing money at people," - prophetic words. Perhaps someone should ask the Republicans/conservatives why they continue to "throw money" at the American electorate - a practice they prefer to associate with those profligate liberals. Republicans have notoriously deeper "war chests" for elections than their Democratic counterparts, and have developed fundraising to an "art form."

While Republicans are not apologetic about raising/spending large amounts of money to promote their own "vested interests," they would deny others the same privilege. In an election year, where polls indicate the smallest "undecided" vote in years, the political parties have long passed the point of "diminishing returns" on campaign spending.

Instead of the rhetoric directed against Democrats, the Republicans can take " a leaf out of their own book" and unilaterally reduce their own campaign spending. Most businesses consider large corporate donations an investment, not a donation. What are they getting in return when that Party is elected? :bow:
 
Upvote 0

elanor

Reunite Gondwanaland!
Nov 9, 2003
3,004
413
68
Left Coast
Visit site
✟16,184.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
ACougar said:
If the Cuban people wanted a new government they would revolt and get it. Why not simply live and let live?
Well said! :thumbsup: What are we so afraid of? We're a big, powerful country. Cuba is a poor, small island nation. If we lift this ban and allow their country's economy to begin to recover from it's effects, then we'd have a chance to find out what the Cuban people really want.

gop_ryan, Cuba is no threat to us. That would be the only justification for what you propose.
 
Upvote 0

ACougar

U.S. Army Retired
Feb 7, 2003
16,795
1,295
Arizona
Visit site
✟37,952.00
Faith
Pagan
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
elanor said:
Well said! :thumbsup: What are we so afraid of? We're a big, powerful country. Cuba is a poor, small island nation. If we lift this ban and allow their country's economy to begin to recover from it's effects, then we'd have a chance to find out what the Cuban people really want.

gop_ryan, Cuba is no threat to us. That would be the only justification for what you propose.
I think the great fear is that a sucessful Cuba mght threaten the idea that without Capitalism we'd we have dirt floors and hungry children.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Swart
Upvote 0

jgarden

Senior Veteran
Jan 1, 2004
10,695
3,181
✟106,405.00
Faith
Methodist
Prior to Castro, Cuba had an opportunuity to enjoy all the supposed benefits associated with "capitalism." Unfortunately, Cuban history shows that dirt floors and hungry children were just as prevelant under a capitalist economic system as a socialist one. The one thing that the Cubans did miss out on, under the Castro regime, were all the benefits associated with Organized Crime investing in the Cuban economy.

During the Batista era, neither the American government nor Organized Crime were remotely interested in the economic prosperity and the future aspirations of the the Cuban people. For two decades, they were quite content to exploit the Cuban people and look the other way while Batista unleashed his secret police. It is now somewhat hypocritical to start crying "crocidile tears" for the plight of the Cuban people merely because a capitalist dictator was replaced by a communist one. :bow:
 
Upvote 0

elanor

Reunite Gondwanaland!
Nov 9, 2003
3,004
413
68
Left Coast
Visit site
✟16,184.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
gop_ryan said:
I am not afraid of Cuba but in the constant pursuit of freedom for all, all dictators must go.
Then in the name of freedom, I propose we lift the embargo (which Castro uses to lambast the US), and allow the Cuban people to build their economy and elect the government of their choice. Because that's what matters--their choice. Not ours. Cuba is not the 51st state, after all.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

elanor

Reunite Gondwanaland!
Nov 9, 2003
3,004
413
68
Left Coast
Visit site
✟16,184.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
And for those of you living in the US who might be following this thread, I encourage you to write to your congressional representatives and let them know where you stand on the Cuban embargo. I am, and so are many, many people in my denomination.
 
Upvote 0

lucid42day

where do I go when the land touches sea
Apr 1, 2004
1,630
97
45
We'll stumble through the APT.
✟9,766.00
Faith
Agnostic
Politics
US-Others
gop_ryan said:
Throwing money people does not solve the problem. It seems that liberals always answer a problem with more money. If anyone was serious about removing Castro, we would declare a total exclusion zone around the island and prevent any aircraft or ship from reaching the island. That would topple the regime within weeks seeing that Cuba is total dependent on foreign sources of energy.
I guess the obvious comeback would be that it appears conservatives always answer a problem with 50,000 troops. Which costs money, of course, but shhh.. I won't tell. ;)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Swart
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

copernicus

Kinder, gentler atheist
May 19, 2002
447
54
Visit site
✟844.00
Faith
Atheist
The Cuban embargo remains in place for only one reason--to garner votes from the important Cuban immigrant community. Nobody else cares about it, and it does real damage to our international prestige. But when have we ever cared about our international prestige? The Cuban embargo is a little like the gun control issue. Taking the popular side of the issue brings no political advantage to a politician, but it can seriously harm his or her chances of winning an election. The special interest group will spare no effort to smear the campaigner who threatens their issue.
 
  • Like
Reactions: elanor
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums
Status
Not open for further replies.