Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Leisure and Society
Hobbies, Interests & Entertainment
Fitness, Health & Nutrition
Interesting panel discussion about cholesterol, saturated fats, fiber
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="trophy33" data-source="post: 77524788" data-attributes="member: 414763"><p>The paper was presented to support that there is no causality between saturated fats and CVDs. However, the paper goes even further and concludes that there is not even any association (which basically rejects any possible causality).</p><p></p><p>From the paper itself:</p><p></p><p><em><strong>Conclusion</strong></em></p><p><em>Findings from the studies reviewed in this paper indicate that the consumption of SFA is not significantly associated with CVD risk, events, or mortality. Based on the scientific evidence, there is no scientific ground to demonize SFA as a cause of CVD. SFA naturally occurring in nutrient-dense foods can be safely included in the diet.</em></p><p></p><p>The paper has 53 references and it seems that all are related to saturated fats in some way. So I am not sure what you mean.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="trophy33, post: 77524788, member: 414763"] The paper was presented to support that there is no causality between saturated fats and CVDs. However, the paper goes even further and concludes that there is not even any association (which basically rejects any possible causality). From the paper itself: [I][B]Conclusion[/B] Findings from the studies reviewed in this paper indicate that the consumption of SFA is not significantly associated with CVD risk, events, or mortality. Based on the scientific evidence, there is no scientific ground to demonize SFA as a cause of CVD. SFA naturally occurring in nutrient-dense foods can be safely included in the diet.[/I] The paper has 53 references and it seems that all are related to saturated fats in some way. So I am not sure what you mean. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Leisure and Society
Hobbies, Interests & Entertainment
Fitness, Health & Nutrition
Interesting panel discussion about cholesterol, saturated fats, fiber
Top
Bottom