Husbands and Wives Need Husbandry and Housewifery

Michie

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Feb 5, 2002
167,173
56,585
Woods
✟4,733,958.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
“This destroyed household that now stands between the sexes is a wound that is suffered inescapably by both men and women.” My eyes were opened when I read these words of Wendell Berry. My wife’s suffering in a home arrangement that has shown itself more and more to be unnatural is in fact also very much my problem; indeed, a problem for our marriage.

There is something unnatural about the home that is consumptive and non-productive, and that is left almost exclusively in the care of a housewife while her husband works somewhere else (indeed, even if ‘remotely’ from home). The most obvious casualty in this form of home has been and is the wife, often overwhelmed and isolated while also stripped of many of the richer aspects of her work in the home.

Berry writes, “Thus housewifery, once a complex discipline acknowledged to be one of the bases of culture and economy, was reduced to the exercise of purchasing power.” There was and is of course still much ‘housework’ to be done, but it tends to be stripped of its more artful aspects, as seen for instance in how ‘convenience’ tends to replace the traditional standard of ‘thrift,’ which latter was “a complex standard, requiring skill, intelligence, and moral character.”

But “degenerate housewifery is indivisible from degenerate husbandry.” And Berry goes further, with this arresting assertion:

Continued below.
 

Paidiske

Clara bonam audax
Site Supporter
Apr 25, 2016
34,287
19,100
44
Albury, Australia
Visit site
✟1,513,070.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
His argument seems to be that subsistence agriculture - or at most a sort of pre-industrial cottage industry - lifestyle are the only healthy and normal way to do things. I can't agree. Sure, a model where one person's contribution is seen as going out to earn money, and the other's is seen as spending that money to curate a particular lifestyle, is pretty hollow. But the answer isn't necessarily to go back to trying to do as much as possible for yourselves; I'd argue that the answer is to have a shared sense of purpose in life, and pursue that as a team.
 
Upvote 0

Michie

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Feb 5, 2002
167,173
56,585
Woods
✟4,733,958.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
His argument seems to be that subsistence agriculture - or at most a sort of pre-industrial cottage industry - lifestyle are the only healthy and normal way to do things. I can't agree. Sure, a model where one person's contribution is seen as going out to earn money, and the other's is seen as spending that money to curate a particular lifestyle, is pretty hollow. But the answer isn't necessarily to go back to trying to do as much as possible for yourselves; I'd argue that the answer is to have a shared sense of purpose in life, and pursue that as a team.
Absolutely. But given the current trends, I thought someone might enjoy the content. It does not mean it applies to all.
 
Upvote 0