- Mar 28, 2005
- 21,828
- 10,798
- 76
- Country
- New Zealand
- Faith
- Charismatic
- Marital Status
- Married
Seeing that the way in which clairvoyants operate is that they make their minds passive, gaze into crystal balls, or get impressions or hear voices while their minds are blank, and that they depend on sensory experiences for their information, is it understandable that when people see Pentecostals make their minds go passive and wait until some type of force takes them over and produces jerking, shaking, rolling, dog barking and other incoherent behaviour, they would draw a direct comparison and accuse them of practising psychic phenomena?
The main characteristcs of psychics and clairvoyants is that they put their faith in sensory experiences that convince them that they are in touch with the spirits. So, if certain Pentecostals act the same way and demonstrate that they are putting their faith in sensory experiences, then maybe they are getting their experiences from the same spirits.
I have just finished reading the book "Growing in the Prophetic" by Mike Bickell. Although Mike is fairly sound himself, he names two "prophets" which he spoke very highly of. They gave prophecies about a drought (which was disproved by the weather bureau stats for that area and time), earthquake (which came to pass), and other prophecies which were quite dramatic but seemed to have little relevance to the Gospel. Also these prophets said that William Branham was the "greatest prophet of the 20th Century", which is a concern because it transpired that he denied the Trinity and came up with all sorts of crazy doctrines. Also, there were doubts about Branham's angelic visitor who gave him guidance about his ministry, and many have doubted that the angel came from God, seeing that the fruit of his ministry was serious damage to the Pentecostal church at that time and caused a major division. Bickell took his guidance from John Wimber who is said to believe in "experience theology" which is another way of believing that sensory experiences are the evidence that the Holy Spirit is moving. The two prophets, Paul Cain and Bob Jones have both been discredited through immorality, and many believe that their prophecies are more clairvoyance than the true Holy Spirit prophetic.
The alternative is Truth theology, which has as its guiding principle, if it isn't clearly taught in the Word of God it is not true. The Word teaches that true prophetic ministry glorifies Christ and brings edification, exhortation and comfort to Christian believers. The prophecies that Cain and Jones brought served more to glorify themselves more than Christ. Therefore there is a reasonable doubt that the prophecies were from the Holy Spirit, and that those who believed them would have been seriously misled and actually deceived.
We activate the power of the Holy Spirit through faith in the written Word of God. I have already made myself clear about that in other threads where I have explained how the Holy Spirit works through faith.
I know that there is going to be some interesting comment about this, because quite a few are going to be offended and probably brand me a heretic and a "Pentecostal basher", but if I can get a few people in bondage to sensory experiences to think about what evangelical faith really is, then all this is fully justified.
The main characteristcs of psychics and clairvoyants is that they put their faith in sensory experiences that convince them that they are in touch with the spirits. So, if certain Pentecostals act the same way and demonstrate that they are putting their faith in sensory experiences, then maybe they are getting their experiences from the same spirits.
I have just finished reading the book "Growing in the Prophetic" by Mike Bickell. Although Mike is fairly sound himself, he names two "prophets" which he spoke very highly of. They gave prophecies about a drought (which was disproved by the weather bureau stats for that area and time), earthquake (which came to pass), and other prophecies which were quite dramatic but seemed to have little relevance to the Gospel. Also these prophets said that William Branham was the "greatest prophet of the 20th Century", which is a concern because it transpired that he denied the Trinity and came up with all sorts of crazy doctrines. Also, there were doubts about Branham's angelic visitor who gave him guidance about his ministry, and many have doubted that the angel came from God, seeing that the fruit of his ministry was serious damage to the Pentecostal church at that time and caused a major division. Bickell took his guidance from John Wimber who is said to believe in "experience theology" which is another way of believing that sensory experiences are the evidence that the Holy Spirit is moving. The two prophets, Paul Cain and Bob Jones have both been discredited through immorality, and many believe that their prophecies are more clairvoyance than the true Holy Spirit prophetic.
The alternative is Truth theology, which has as its guiding principle, if it isn't clearly taught in the Word of God it is not true. The Word teaches that true prophetic ministry glorifies Christ and brings edification, exhortation and comfort to Christian believers. The prophecies that Cain and Jones brought served more to glorify themselves more than Christ. Therefore there is a reasonable doubt that the prophecies were from the Holy Spirit, and that those who believed them would have been seriously misled and actually deceived.
We activate the power of the Holy Spirit through faith in the written Word of God. I have already made myself clear about that in other threads where I have explained how the Holy Spirit works through faith.
I know that there is going to be some interesting comment about this, because quite a few are going to be offended and probably brand me a heretic and a "Pentecostal basher", but if I can get a few people in bondage to sensory experiences to think about what evangelical faith really is, then all this is fully justified.
Last edited: