- Jun 4, 2013
- 10,132
- 996
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Non-Denom
- Marital Status
- Widowed
- Politics
- US-Others
Where does the evidence in that paper support that claim?
If it was already existing information, then why weren't there dominant and recessive traits before that?
Why do you think humans and chimps look different from each other? Do you agree that it is due to the differences in the DNA sequences within their respective genomes?
Every person born has different dominant and recessive traits. Why all the strawmen Loud? I agree it is the combination of two different genomes with every mating pair in which the chromosomes combine and create something new every time. I agree that mutations can take half of the possibility available and when it doesn't kill the host or do nothing - may on the gazillion occasion, get lucky and get a working combination that happens in the reproductive organs and benefits the current host not at all, but possibly helps the descendant. But why trip on the gazillionth occasion when it happens in the billions when male and female chromosomes combine in a natural sequence that produces variations (if of the same breed) and new breeds (if of different breeds) within the population???
Why pretend it is anything other than what occurs naturally in the natural world? Breed mates with breed producing new breeds - with no evolution and no missing links. Again - Asian mates with African and produces and Afro-Asian - and I need none of your Fairie Dust evolution to bring it about.
Upvote
0