No, they wouldn't. Any fossil of any species group found under rocks that are 65 million years old are accepted as being at least 65 million years old.
You haven't shown that it is unrealistic for these features to have been preserved for 65 million years. You are begging the question.
The facts are this. Dinosaurs are ALWAYS found below rocks that are at least 65 million years old. It is the ROCKS that give the fossils their age.
They are accepted as 65 million years old based on an evolutionary worldview of millions of years. Of course that makes sense to someone thinking like that. They would never think that the fossils were laid only a few thousand years ago as a result of a worldwide flood.
"Begging the question" ... hmmm, sounds like somebody has been studying "logical fallacies"? How am I begging the question?
Upvote
0