- Dec 19, 2010
- 25,653
- 33,039
- Faith
- Protestant
- Marital Status
- Private
- Politics
- US-Others
Iran is going to have a nuclear accident.
Upvote
0
Since none of this took place, I hope you will no longer use osintdefender as a source for news. This Twitter account has been shown in the past to push Russian propaganda and misinformation.Natanz is also being hit, along with early warning radar stations in Syria and a building in Baghdad where IRGC brass were meeting with Iraqi Islamic Resistance leaders. I'm following osintdefender on twitter he's usually pretty solid with this stuff.
The only hard hard is getting the fuel.Iran has been a busy beaver:
"Iran is able to produce more weapon-grade uranium (WGU) and at a faster rate since the IAEA’s last report in November 2023 due to increased stocks of enriched uranium and increased uranium enrichment capacity."
"Iran’s stocks of enriched uranium and its centrifuge capacity combined are sufficient to make enough WGU, taken as 25 kilograms (kg) of WGU, for seven nuclear weapons in one month, nine in two months, eleven in three months, 12-13 in four months, and 13 in five months."
Analysis of IAEA Iran Verification and Monitoring Report — February 2024 | Institute for Science and International Security
Analysis of IAEA Iran Verification and Monitoring Report — February 2024 | Institute for Science and International Security
ISIS is a non-profit, non-partisan institution providing public knowledge of nuclear proliferation and international security.isis-online.org
Iran will just target the West. Allah told Muslims that they will take Rome. Muslims talk about this today.
The West was Christian but is now no longer Christian. However, I think Muslims think of the West as primarily Christian lands.
The only hard hard is getting the fuel.
You didn't say about importance of christian lives.
Here in the "axis of evil" as youAccording to ChatGPT: Iran's uranium resources primarily come from its domestic mines. The country has several uranium mines, including the Saghand, Gchine, and Bandar Abbas mines. These mines provide Iran with the raw material needed for its uranium enrichment activities. Additionally, Iran has explored various avenues for obtaining uranium, including partnerships with other countries for mining and trade agreements.
The West stands in the way of the Axis of Evil (Russia, China, Iran, NK.) That is the importance of Christian lives. We stand in their way.
Are all us other than Christian westerners collaborators somehow?The West stands in the way of the Axis of Evil (Russia, China, Iran, NK.) That is the importance of Christian lives. We stand in their way.
Since none of this took place, I hope you will no longer use osintdefender as a source for news. This Twitter account has been shown in the past to push Russian propaganda and misinformation.
@sentdefender, has been identified by a research company as belonging to a member of the U.S. military from Georgia who has amplified Russian propaganda. As previously reported, both have spread false information, including reporting a nonexistent explosion near the White House that sent stock prices down.
(The @sentdefender account’s display name is OSINTdefender)
A European research company called Molfar, meanwhile, dug into @sentdefender and found that the account had previously used the name Simon Anderson, who gave his location as Georgia.
In a published report, Molfar said the email associated with OSINTdefender on Block’s Cash App combines Anderson’s first name with his mother’s.
A lot of what @sentdefender has published has come from Russian Telegram channels, Molfar found, such as a video of supposed Ukrainian troops who surrendered to Russia. Another post with of what he described as a failed Ukrainian offensive used footage from WarGonzo, a pro-war Russian blogger.
Iran didn't say nothing happened, they said there was an attack by infiltrators.So Iran denies anything happened and you take their word for it?
Natanz wasn't targeted. The only target was an empty airbase in Isfahan, which is 60 miles south of Natanz. I'm not going by Iran's take; according to CNN, satellite images taken of the airbase this morning show no significant damage; a senior EU official said it was a very limited attack with no human consequences or huge damage, and the International Atomic Energy Agency confirmed that there is no damage to Iran’s nuclear sites. As for the attack in Syria, that's a regular occurrence and probably isn't related to the attack on Iran.CNN Reuters, BBC, AP, ABC (which is specifying Natanz as a target) now reporting Israel attacked Iran, Iran says nothing happened.. and you go with... Iran's take?
The article I linked to and Molfar provided plenty of evidence that osintdefender shares Russian propaganda.odd that you think he's got a pro-russian bias as most of the posts are pro-ukrainian, and he'll use Russian telegram to verify things like attacks within Russia or Crimea
Here in the "axis of evil" as you
call it, things don't look as they
may to you.
But are you saying that christiam lives-
because they are christians- are of special value?
Iran didn't say nothing happened, they said there was an attack by infiltrators.
Natanz wasn't targeted. The only target was an empty airbase in Isfahan, which is 60 miles south of Natanz. I'm not going by Iran's take; according to CNN, satellite images taken of the airbase this morning show no significant damage; a senior EU official said it was a very limited attack with no human consequences or huge damage, and the International Atomic Energy Agency confirmed that there is no damage to Iran’s nuclear sites. As for the attack in Syria, that's a regular occurrence and probably isn't related to the attack on Iran.
So to review what osintdefender was reporting according to your post: "Natanz is also being hit, along with early warning radar stations in Syria and a building in Baghdad where IRGC brass were meeting with Iraqi Islamic Resistance leaders."
Natanz was not being hit, early warning stations in syria werent being hit (Only one, and it may not have been related to the attack on Iran) and a building in Iraq where IRGC brass were meeting with Iraqi Islamic Resistance leaders wasn't hit.
The conclusion based on this; osintdefender was spreading fake news.
The article I linked to and Molfar provided plenty of evidence that osintdefender shares Russian propaganda.
OSINTdefender is a user of the social network X, which was previously known as Twitter. His posts often contain pro-Russian propaganda or blatant lies. Some of his publications have been a concern for many readers. For example, the story about Ukrainians being accused of a war crime for throwing a grenade at Russians or his praise of Russia's power and its geopolitical influence...
Israelis fired 3 missiles in limited strike
Three missiles were fired from Israeli fighter aircraft outside of Iran in Friday morning’s very limited strike, according to a senior U.S. official.
The Israelis were targeting an air defense radar site near Isfahan that’s part of the protection of the Natanz nuclear facility, the official said. The first assessment is that the strike took out the site, but assessment hasn’t been completed, the official said.
Since air defense systems can be located dozens of miles from the sites they protect, that would make sense. It appears they were spared since sattelite images are showing no damage to any structures in or around the Isfahan airbase.so the Isfahan location was part of air defense for Natanz is where that angle is coming from
Basically when you're getting information as it's currently happening there can be confusion, lack of verification, and exaggerations. It's not quite the same as intentionally spreading misinfo.Since air defense systems can be located dozens of miles from the sites they protect, that would make sense. It appears they were spared since sattelite images are showing no damage to any structures in or around the Isfahan airbase.
I don't have any more information than anybody else - just the same limited news that's available to everybody else.
But I get the impression that if it was an attack it was a muted response, in line with Iran's recent attack which didn't seem to target "strategic assets" in Israel.
If Iran's nuclear facilities are near Isfahan, then I suspect Israel was giving notice that it can destroy those facilities if it wants to.
One expert told the BBC that the selection of Isfahan, Iran’s second city, as a potential target was “very significant” as it is the site of a controversial refining facility suspected of producing nuclear-weapons-grade uranium.
It’s also one of Iran’s best-defended sites.
Speaking to broadcaster, Hamish De Bretton Gordon, a former commander of UK and Nato nuclear forces, said: “[The reported attack] was fairly near to where we believe Iran is building nuclear weapons, so I expect it was a nod to them.”