No, I didn't insult you. It's just that as an educated philosopher, I find it difficult to digest that there are people who disregard women's well-being, on both the physical and psychological level, in the name of "Christian Theology" to such an extent that even the most extreme and statistically small examples somehow get classified for moral denunciation along with the outcomes of every sexually irresponsible gal or strumpet [and yes, I'm very aware I've used this word] who has all too casually laid on her back and gotten pregnant out of purely consensual contexts with a man, not only having gotten pregnant in the process but also deciding that being pregnant isn't "liberally convenient."
No, the cases I'm citing are quite different. Very different, and these other cases where women are victims of rape, or incest, or where doctors have found an ectoptic pregnancy, lie outside of the usual terms of culpability where taking the life of the fetus is concerned ........................ and one shouldn't have to have a degree in social philosophy to realize this dis-junction and non-equivalence.