A Shrunken Arsenal: The Alarming Decline of U.S. Munitions

Vambram

Born-again Christian; Constitutional conservative
Dec 3, 2006
2,747
1,128
59
Saint James, Missouri
✟74,426.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican

As fighting rages in the Middle East and Europe and China looms as a threat, America's dwindling arsenal of high-end munitions emerges as an alarming crisis. The United States, once a fortress of military might, now faces the prospect of a munitions deficit in an era brimming with uncertainties. This desperate situation demands the development of a national critical munitions stockpile.

European weapons makers are overwhelmed and struggling to meet Ukraine's consumption of more than 6,000 artillery rounds each day during peak counteroffensive fighting. Ukraine's ability to stave off defeat and defend itself against the Russian invasion largely depends on an uninterrupted supply of these rounds. Ukrainian forces are conserving their ammunition supply, which might lead to postponements in upcoming counterattacks. Over the coming months, this shortage of ammunition could compel Ukrainian military units to make difficult choices regarding the allocation of resources across various frontlines, focusing on areas where maintaining control is most crucial and potentially allowing minor territorial losses in less critical sectors.

To supplement Ukraine's massive ammunition requirements, DoD pulls munitions from its own war reserve stocks. Further compounding the matter: In an attempt to extract stricter immigration policies, House Republicans are blocking a congressional aid package for Ukraine.

Last year, to help meet the demand for Ukrainian munitions, the Pentagon tapped into a stockpile of American 155mm rounds in Israel, sending hundreds of thousands to Ukraine. These rounds, stored for decades in Israeli bunkers, are to provide an Israeli qualitative military edge, a pillar of American policy in the Middle East. Now Israel needs them back to target Hamas's command cells in its war in Gaza. The U.S. is supporting two countries, both of which use enormous amounts of 155-millimeter artillery and other ammunition in wars that may stretch on for many months. Running out of ideas, last month the Pentagon established a team to examine American inventories to identify ammunition for Israel. Earlier this month, Senator Deb Fischer, a senior Senate Armed Services Committee member, remarked that the U.S. must expand its munitions production capability.

Once a conflict begins it can lead to extraordinarily high munitions consumption. The fighting in Ukraine should serve as a warning regarding production of munitions the U.S. would need in a conflict with China over Taiwan. The U.S. must resolve the extensive issues within its munitions manufacturing processes ahead of a conflict with China.

American forces require an enormous volume of critical munitions to fight against a technologically advanced military force. This ammo is also necessary to equip partner forces in Asia, such as Australia, with the long-range anti-ship munitions needed to defeat the Chinese flotilla or prevent it from ever embarking. The stockpile also ensures that American industrial output is sustained in times of crisis and preserves the United States' global military edge.

The U.S. also provides Taiwan with munitions sufficient to blunt an initial Chinese blow. This strategy – codified by the 1979 Taiwan Relations Act – involves ensuring Taiwan has sufficient defense capabilities against a Chinese attack. The U.S. arms Taiwan only to a level that does not disrupt the diplomatic equilibrium between Washington and Beijing. But, there is growing concern in the Pentagon and the Indo-Pacific that Taiwan does not have enough of the high-tech munitions to hold off a PRC attack. Here again, the shrinking U.S. munitions reserve represents a risk.

In a U.S. fight with China, American forces will likely burn through munitions stocks within three weeks. Even with a surge of the U.S. industrial base, replenishing stocks will take more than six months. In the interim, the U.S. will be without sufficient bombs and bullets for its cutting-edge systems, such as fifth-generation fighter jets and High Mobility Rocket Launcher Systems, and anti-air missiles needed to protect our nuclear aircraft carriers and bases in the Pacific.

Right now, the warning indicators are blinking red. The massive need for ammunition in such conflicts highlights weaknesses in the American defense industry, which no longer produces munitions at the rate it did decades ago. The post-Cold War defense budget reductions led to a swift merger of the defense sector, which saw a drop from fifty-one major defense providers in the early 1990s to five by the end of that decade. This consolidation led to a tightened capacity.

To arm our allies and partners and our own forces to deter and, if necessary, fight a major theater war, the United States requires a critical munitions stockpile. This reserve will enable the Department of Defense to restore essential munitions stocks vital for maintaining air dominance, defending against air and missile threats, and targeting hard and deeply buried objectives.

The PROCURE Act, introduced by a bipartisan group of senators in the previous Congress, would go a long way toward building this stockpile. The legislation aims to establish a $500 million per year revolving fund in the Treasury Department for the Pentagon to procure critical munitions. This fund would allow the Defense Department to swiftly replenish high-demand munitions supplied to partner countries in future conflicts, using profits from the U.S. Foreign Military Sales program. The act is designed to support democratic nations and protect American interests overseas, allowing the Pentagon to continuously order critical munitions. The Senate Armed Services Committee should push to get the PROCURE act passed into law.

In addition, we must expand the National Defense Stockpile, a largely obscure reserve of raw material based in Fort Belvoir, Virginia, with operations throughout the United States. The National Defense Stockpile holds an emergency supply of 50 critical minerals. Many of these minerals, such as aluminum, titanium, and magnesium, are used in the production of munitions. The value of materials in the U.S. National Defense Stockpile has drastically decreased from $42 billion in 1952 to less than $1 billion today. America's mineral reserves are significantly lower than China's, with the National Defense Stockpile maintaining only 300 metric tons of cobalt compared to China's 7,000 metric tons. Congress must expand the National Defense Stockpile to support a potential major theater war.

Our munitions stockpiles and production capacity are not just inadequate; they are a glaring vulnerability in our national defense strategy. We must act with resolve and urgency to revitalize our defense industrial base and expand our reservoir of munition-production minerals. Nothing less than our national interests and global stability is at stake.
 

Laodicean60

Well-Known Member
Jul 2, 2023
2,262
1,026
63
NM
✟35,702.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
In addition, we must expand the National Defense Stockpile
I mention something about ending the war soon in another thread about this. If we keep going like this, we'll be back doored by China. Then you have us defending shipping lanes near Yemen but luckily, we are finally getting help from the Europeans.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Vambram
Upvote 0

Pommer

CoPacEtiC SkEpTic
Sep 13, 2008
17,270
10,831
Earth
✟150,363.00
Country
United States
Faith
Deist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Democrat

As fighting rages in the Middle East and Europe and China looms as a threat, America's dwindling arsenal of high-end munitions emerges as an alarming crisis. The United States, once a fortress of military might, now faces the prospect of a munitions deficit in an era brimming with uncertainties. This desperate situation demands the development of a national critical munitions stockpile.

European weapons makers are overwhelmed and struggling to meet Ukraine's consumption of more than 6,000 artillery rounds each day during peak counteroffensive fighting. Ukraine's ability to stave off defeat and defend itself against the Russian invasion largely depends on an uninterrupted supply of these rounds. Ukrainian forces are conserving their ammunition supply, which might lead to postponements in upcoming counterattacks. Over the coming months, this shortage of ammunition could compel Ukrainian military units to make difficult choices regarding the allocation of resources across various frontlines, focusing on areas where maintaining control is most crucial and potentially allowing minor territorial losses in less critical sectors.

To supplement Ukraine's massive ammunition requirements, DoD pulls munitions from its own war reserve stocks. Further compounding the matter: In an attempt to extract stricter immigration policies, House Republicans are blocking a congressional aid package for Ukraine.

Last year, to help meet the demand for Ukrainian munitions, the Pentagon tapped into a stockpile of American 155mm rounds in Israel, sending hundreds of thousands to Ukraine. These rounds, stored for decades in Israeli bunkers, are to provide an Israeli qualitative military edge, a pillar of American policy in the Middle East. Now Israel needs them back to target Hamas's command cells in its war in Gaza. The U.S. is supporting two countries, both of which use enormous amounts of 155-millimeter artillery and other ammunition in wars that may stretch on for many months. Running out of ideas, last month the Pentagon established a team to examine American inventories to identify ammunition for Israel. Earlier this month, Senator Deb Fischer, a senior Senate Armed Services Committee member, remarked that the U.S. must expand its munitions production capability.

Once a conflict begins it can lead to extraordinarily high munitions consumption. The fighting in Ukraine should serve as a warning regarding production of munitions the U.S. would need in a conflict with China over Taiwan. The U.S. must resolve the extensive issues within its munitions manufacturing processes ahead of a conflict with China.

American forces require an enormous volume of critical munitions to fight against a technologically advanced military force. This ammo is also necessary to equip partner forces in Asia, such as Australia, with the long-range anti-ship munitions needed to defeat the Chinese flotilla or prevent it from ever embarking. The stockpile also ensures that American industrial output is sustained in times of crisis and preserves the United States' global military edge.

The U.S. also provides Taiwan with munitions sufficient to blunt an initial Chinese blow. This strategy – codified by the 1979 Taiwan Relations Act – involves ensuring Taiwan has sufficient defense capabilities against a Chinese attack. The U.S. arms Taiwan only to a level that does not disrupt the diplomatic equilibrium between Washington and Beijing. But, there is growing concern in the Pentagon and the Indo-Pacific that Taiwan does not have enough of the high-tech munitions to hold off a PRC attack. Here again, the shrinking U.S. munitions reserve represents a risk.

In a U.S. fight with China, American forces will likely burn through munitions stocks within three weeks. Even with a surge of the U.S. industrial base, replenishing stocks will take more than six months. In the interim, the U.S. will be without sufficient bombs and bullets for its cutting-edge systems, such as fifth-generation fighter jets and High Mobility Rocket Launcher Systems, and anti-air missiles needed to protect our nuclear aircraft carriers and bases in the Pacific.

Right now, the warning indicators are blinking red. The massive need for ammunition in such conflicts highlights weaknesses in the American defense industry, which no longer produces munitions at the rate it did decades ago. The post-Cold War defense budget reductions led to a swift merger of the defense sector, which saw a drop from fifty-one major defense providers in the early 1990s to five by the end of that decade. This consolidation led to a tightened capacity.

To arm our allies and partners and our own forces to deter and, if necessary, fight a major theater war, the United States requires a critical munitions stockpile. This reserve will enable the Department of Defense to restore essential munitions stocks vital for maintaining air dominance, defending against air and missile threats, and targeting hard and deeply buried objectives.

The PROCURE Act, introduced by a bipartisan group of senators in the previous Congress, would go a long way toward building this stockpile. The legislation aims to establish a $500 million per year revolving fund in the Treasury Department for the Pentagon to procure critical munitions. This fund would allow the Defense Department to swiftly replenish high-demand munitions supplied to partner countries in future conflicts, using profits from the U.S. Foreign Military Sales program. The act is designed to support democratic nations and protect American interests overseas, allowing the Pentagon to continuously order critical munitions. The Senate Armed Services Committee should push to get the PROCURE act passed into law.

In addition, we must expand the National Defense Stockpile, a largely obscure reserve of raw material based in Fort Belvoir, Virginia, with operations throughout the United States. The National Defense Stockpile holds an emergency supply of 50 critical minerals. Many of these minerals, such as aluminum, titanium, and magnesium, are used in the production of munitions. The value of materials in the U.S. National Defense Stockpile has drastically decreased from $42 billion in 1952 to less than $1 billion today. America's mineral reserves are significantly lower than China's, with the National Defense Stockpile maintaining only 300 metric tons of cobalt compared to China's 7,000 metric tons. Congress must expand the National Defense Stockpile to support a potential major theater war.

Our munitions stockpiles and production capacity are not just inadequate; they are a glaring vulnerability in our national defense strategy. We must act with resolve and urgency to revitalize our defense industrial base and expand our reservoir of munition-production minerals. Nothing less than our national interests and global stability is at stake.
LOL, we’re “running outta ammo”?
How’re we going to keep our homeless in such luxury if we ain’t got bullets?
 
Upvote 0

Vambram

Born-again Christian; Constitutional conservative
Dec 3, 2006
2,747
1,128
59
Saint James, Missouri
✟74,426.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
LOL, we’re “running outta ammo”?
How’re we going to keep our homeless in such luxury if we ain’t got bullets?
Are you doubting that our military stockpile of ammunition is being depleted faster than it is be replaced with new ammunition?
 
Upvote 0

Hans Blaster

Rocket surgeon
Mar 11, 2017
15,557
12,417
54
USA
✟309,031.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Are you doubting that our military stockpile of ammunition is being depleted faster than it is be replaced with new ammunition?
No one doubts it is being expended faster than produced, but is it really being depleted?

How many 155-mm shells do we have?
How many are standard high explosive versions?
How many are cluster munitions?
How many are precision guided?
etc.

It is my understanding that the DOD is not forthcoming about the actual size of our arsenal.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Vambram
Upvote 0

Laodicean60

Well-Known Member
Jul 2, 2023
2,262
1,026
63
NM
✟35,702.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
This ain't new. It's been reported on for over a year now. Find something "new" for the news.

But if you think. A prolonged back and forth fight that we've witnessed for two years now us, and our NATO allies will leave ourselves vulnerable in our own countries. You do know our allies have been riding on our back for all this time in military spending. Our allies will probably be the first to reduce their charity for their own protection.

When I was political the main complaint of Democrats was military spending. I think a little love should be given to our Republican brothers for this military spending since we want war.

I personally have no love for both, and I think a future debt crisis will be worse than Russia and Ukraine war. What happens when a country is broke? I think my free money will stop :(

I've heard people's fears that Russia won't stop with Ukraine and will attack NATO. I say Putin isn't that stupid to attack NATO without bring the wrath of USA. After the arms race in the future he will or if we run low on munitions and China backdoors us, he will. You do know we are expending munitions in the Red Sea? We can't be blind to China. They now have more submarines than we do. What a mess!
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Vambram
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Gene2memE

Newbie
Oct 22, 2013
4,167
6,378
✟278,946.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Wow, that article is out of touch with reality.

1. Ukrainian 155mm consumption isn't 6,000 shells per day. Consumption is likely two thirds of that at present, although Ukraine would like it to be higher. Upper estimates of Ukrainian 155m shell consumption are in the order of 90,000 to 140,000 per month. For 2022, Ukraine shot off about 3000 rounds per day of heavy artillery (either NATO standard 155mm or Warsaw Pact standard 152mm).

2. Israel doesn't need a lot of 155mm artillery to fight in Gaza and the shells it does need are mostly WP shells (likely M825 or M110) that Ukraine doesn't really use many of. I think the Israeli request in November was for ~15,000 155mm shells/fuses/charges.

3. US 155mm production is about 30,000 per month at present. That's not great - considering in the late 1960s the US was producing nearly 1 million shells per month - but it's also double what it was 12 months ago and up from 12,000 per month at the start of the war. US production is due to go to 80,000 per month before the end of this year and 100,000 per month in early 2025.

4. The US is not supplying Ukraine alone. Western European 155mm production was close to 40,000 shells per month in November 2023. That's up from 18,000-19,000 per month pre-war. European production is forecast to triple, with estimates that output will reach 120,000 to 165,000 shells per month by the end of 2025.

5. Ukraine is getting it's own 155mm production on stream. That's likely only going to be producing ~2000 shells per month, but it's a start.

6. Ukraine is buying 155m shells from elsewhere. It recently bought stocks from India, and there's talk about supply out of South Korea, Indonesia, Turkey and elsewhere.
 
Upvote 0

Hans Blaster

Rocket surgeon
Mar 11, 2017
15,557
12,417
54
USA
✟309,031.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
6. Ukraine is buying 155m shells from elsewhere. It recently bought stocks from India, and there's talk about supply out of South Korea, Indonesia, Turkey and elsewhere.

I was a little surprised by India on your list, but it checks out. I know India has purchased a lot of Soviet-standard Equipment including fighter jets.

India still has some 130-mm Soviet howitzers and uses (russian) Grad and Smerch rocket artillery, but no 152-mm guns.
 
Upvote 0

NxNW

Well-Known Member
Nov 30, 2019
4,982
3,661
NW
✟197,655.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Are you doubting that our military stockpile of ammunition is being depleted faster than it is be replaced with new ammunition?
We could cut the military budget by 75% and still have more than we need.
 
Upvote 0

Laodicean60

Well-Known Member
Jul 2, 2023
2,262
1,026
63
NM
✟35,702.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
I was a little surprised by India on your list, but it checks out. I know India has purchased a lot of Soviet-standard Equipment including fighter jets.

India still has some 130-mm Soviet howitzers and uses (russian) Grad and Smerch rocket artillery, but no 152-mm guns.
Where are you reading this, please? thx From what I looked up India receives Russian armament and also resources I thought it would be dumb that India would bite the hand that feeds them.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Laodicean60

Well-Known Member
Jul 2, 2023
2,262
1,026
63
NM
✟35,702.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
How many aircraft carriers do we have? How many does the rest of the world have combined?
Doesn't matter, if we gave all our stuff away our new language would be Chinese.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Vambram
Upvote 0

Laodicean60

Well-Known Member
Jul 2, 2023
2,262
1,026
63
NM
✟35,702.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
What a joke. China is no threat.
You are partially right, their navy can't travel long distances but in time they will. They are currently developing nuclear power in their fleet.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Vambram
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Hans Blaster

Rocket surgeon
Mar 11, 2017
15,557
12,417
54
USA
✟309,031.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Where are you reading this, please? thx From what I looked up India receives Russian armament and also resources I thought it would be dumb that India would bite the hand that feeds them.

It was the wiki page for the Indian artillery, don't have the direct link (followed down a set of links from the main Indian Army page). There is apparently a project to switch (ongoing for about 25 years) to switch to 155mm. (Their Air Force flies Russian and French jets.)

I have no idea about military aid to India.
 
Upvote 0