God-ordained Genocide

eleos1954

God is Love
Site Supporter
Nov 14, 2017
9,898
5,711
Utah
✟731,130.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
Genocide:
noun
  1. the deliberate and systematic extermination of a national, racial, political, or cultural group.

But Sihon king of Heshbon was not willing for us to pass through his land, for Yahweh your God stiffened his spirit and made his heart obstinate, in order to give him over into your hand, as he is today. And Yahweh said to me, ‘See, I have begun to give Sihon and his land over to you. Begin to possess, so that you may fully possess his land.’ “Then Sihon with all his people came out to meet us in battle at Jahaz. But Yahweh our God gave him over to us, and we struck him down with his sons and all his people. So we captured all his cities at that time and devoted to destruction the men, women, and little ones of every city. We left no survivor remaining.
— Deuteronomy 2:30-34

One objection I hear ad nauseum to the Reformed Theology view of election/predestination is that God wants to save everyone. So I get this quote quite often:

The Lord is not slow about His promise, as some consider slowness, but is patient toward you, not willing for any to perish but for all to come to repentance.
— 2 Peter 3:9

So how do my Arminian/synergism-leaning friends reconcile the multiple examples of God-ordained genocide in the OT with your view of God loving everyone and wanting them all saved?
God knows the future ..... we do not .... if mankind is left totally to himself ... we would indeed annihilate (destroy) ourselves. God wants to preserve humanity not destroy it .... because He knows without His intervention we would do this ... then yeah He has commanded what we call "genocide" in times past ... but not to the point of extinction of the human race by human hands though ... all judgement is up to Him. In the cases of "God ordained genocide" in the bible in earlier times ... personally ... I can only conclude that God foresaw to protect the linage from which Messiah would come (Jesus who through Him one might be saved - receive eternal life - most important) and He chose in some cases in the past to work through mankind to do that .... sometimes not.

This is clearly seen by God Himself his act of near "genocide" by the flood. God has total authority over His creation and He will indeed act Himself.

We should wait on the Lord and not commit genocide ourselves and leave that up to God. We live in similar yet different times (after Messiah) as Gods prophetic timeline plays out. He is in control of everything ... and ultimately it does end well. So, though it occurred in the past it was not without reason ... with the onset of Messiah that "reason for genocide" was removed.

Prophetically speaking ... we will once again come to the point of completely destroying ourselves ... we have almost unbearable times ahead ... however .... God will step in and end it all Himself before we completely annihilate ourselves... and the good news He will re-create everything very very good and this will be for eternity ... Amen !!!!

As far as mankind goes ... God has placed mankind (and His other intelligent beings) from the beginning (in the position of choice (free choice). It's about love ... you can't have true love without choice. So this is the Love of God ... love is complete freedom of choice give to us by our creator ... God will accept everyone's choices ... to love or not to love. God is love. He loves all so much that He allows all freedom of choice and won't make their choices for them ... this is true love.

God is waiting until everyone has made their choices (He is long suffering) ... He will then return. Amen!!

Some say God is a mystery ... how He acts or does not act is a mystery ... no not really ....

The mystery of God's will is the uniting of all things in heaven and earth under Christ.

We can understand this.
 
Upvote 0

Halbhh

Everything You say is Life to me
Site Supporter
Mar 17, 2015
17,250
9,229
catholic -- embracing all Christians
✟1,168,501.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I’m sticking with genocide, and the definition given. It’s accurate.
It is accurate, yes, in human terms when a person thinks God doesn't exist or if a person assumed that God killed them but didn't bring them to a new place alive in the spirit. Or if a person literally believes there is no afterlife.

The contradiction that makes "genocide" inaccurate only happens when someone tries to say that "God committed genocide".

So, in post #46 there is a more accurate phrase for when God exists (as we know He does) and is the one doing the removal from Earthly life.
 
Upvote 0

HTacianas

Well-Known Member
Jul 9, 2018
8,586
9,082
Florida
✟329,308.00
Country
United States
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
All the people were killed. That’s genocide.

All the people were killed. That was a war. You're applying the modern notion of genocide to a time when there was no such thing. It was simply the way wars were fought in those days.
 
Upvote 0

Hammster

The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God.
Christian Forums Staff
Site Advisor
Site Supporter
Apr 5, 2007
140,864
25,329
55
New Jerusalem
Visit site
✟1,745,484.00
Country
United States
Faith
Reformed
Marital Status
Married
God knows the future ..... we do not .... if mankind is left totally to himself ... we would indeed annihilate (destroy) ourselves. God wants to preserve humanity not destroy it .... because He knows without His intervention we would do this ... then yeah He has commanded what we call "genocide" in times past ... but not to the point of extinction of the human race by human hands though ... all judgement is up to Him. In the cases of "God ordained genocide" in the bible in earlier times ... personally ... I can only conclude that God foresaw to protect the linage from which Messiah would come (Jesus who through Him one might be saved - receive eternal life - most important) and He chose in some cases in the past to work through mankind to do that .... sometimes not.

This is clearly seen by God Himself his act of near "genocide" by the flood. God has total authority over His creation and He will indeed act Himself.

We should wait on the Lord and not commit genocide ourselves and leave that up to God. We live in similar yet different times (after Messiah) as Gods prophetic timeline plays out. He is in control of everything ... and ultimately it does end well. So, though it occurred in the past it was not without reason ... with the onset of Messiah that "reason for genocide" was removed.

Prophetically speaking ... we will once again come to the point of completely destroying ourselves ... we have almost unbearable times ahead ... however .... God will step in and end it all Himself before we completely annihilate ourselves... and the good news He will re-create everything very very good and this will be for eternity ... Amen !!!!

As far as mankind goes ... God has placed mankind (and His other intelligent beings) from the beginning (in the position of choice (free choice). It's about love ... you can't have true love without choice. So this is the Love of God ... love is complete freedom of choice give to us by our creator ... God will accept everyone's choices ... to love or not to love. God is love. He loves all so much that He allows all freedom of choice and won't make their choices for them ... this is true love.

God is waiting until everyone has made their choices (He is long suffering) ... He will then return. Amen!!

Some say God is a mystery ... how He acts or does not act is a mystery ... no not really ....

The mystery of God's will is the uniting of all things in heaven and earth under Christ.

We can understand this.
Did you actually read all of the OP?
 
Upvote 0

Hammster

The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God.
Christian Forums Staff
Site Advisor
Site Supporter
Apr 5, 2007
140,864
25,329
55
New Jerusalem
Visit site
✟1,745,484.00
Country
United States
Faith
Reformed
Marital Status
Married
It is accurate, yes, in human terms when a person thinks God doesn't exist or if a person assumed that God killed them but didn't bring them to a new place alive in the spirit. Or if a person literally believes there is no afterlife.

The contradiction that makes "genocide" inaccurate only happens when someone tries to say that "God committed genocide".

So, in post #46 there is a more accurate phrase for when God exists (as we know He does) and is the one doing the removal from Earthly life.
Let’s not haggle over terms. Call it what you want. The fact is that God ordered the destruction of many people, even those many would consider innocent.
 
Upvote 0

Hammster

The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God.
Christian Forums Staff
Site Advisor
Site Supporter
Apr 5, 2007
140,864
25,329
55
New Jerusalem
Visit site
✟1,745,484.00
Country
United States
Faith
Reformed
Marital Status
Married
All the people were killed. That was a war. You're applying the modern notion of genocide to a time when there was no such thing. It was simply the way wars were fought in those days.
Okay, what did God consider a successful victory?
 
Upvote 0

Halbhh

Everything You say is Life to me
Site Supporter
Mar 17, 2015
17,250
9,229
catholic -- embracing all Christians
✟1,168,501.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
@HTacianas @eleos1954 @Hammster -- consider:

Suppose one day you find out that a criminal drug dealer named Jane who lived not far from you, both her and her daughter Sarah are gone, and you read that a group of apparent vigilantes (some called a 'lynch mob') have killed both Jane and her daughter Sarah with a dramatic attack (with grenades, actually).

An obituary for Jane and her young daughter appears in the local paper....

Years pass. You grow older and it's finally time to retire.

You decide you don't like this neighborhood anymore and you want a very different life so you decide to move to a far away place, somewhere better.

So, you take a flight with all your few things you choose to keep, and fly to New Zealand.

There, in New Zealand you are amazed and delighted to meet both Jane and her daughter Sarah both quite alive and doing great, living blissful happy lives, where it's clear Jane has very much changed her life for the better!

Well, then you have to amend the belief that Ralph actually killed Jane and Sarah, as they are quite clearly alive.
 
Upvote 0

Hammster

The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God.
Christian Forums Staff
Site Advisor
Site Supporter
Apr 5, 2007
140,864
25,329
55
New Jerusalem
Visit site
✟1,745,484.00
Country
United States
Faith
Reformed
Marital Status
Married
@HTacianas @eleos1954 @Hammster -- consider:

Suppose one day you find out that a criminal drug dealer named Jane who lived not far from you, both her and her daughter Sarah are gone, and you read that a group of apparent vigilantes (some called a 'lynch mob') have killed both Jane and her daughter Sarah with a dramatic attack (with grenades, actually).

An obituary for Jane and her young daughter appears in the local paper....

Years pass. You grow older and it's finally time to retire.

You decide you don't like this neighborhood anymore and you want a very different life so you decide to move to a far away place, somewhere better.

So, you take a flight with all your few things you choose to keep, and fly to New Zealand.

There, in New Zealand you are amazed and delighted to meet both Jane and her daughter Sarah both quite alive and doing great, living blissful happy lives, where it's clear Jane has very much changed her life for the better!

Well, then you have to amend the belief that Ralph actually killed Jane and Sarah, as they are quite clearly alive.
Please try to post on topic.
 
Upvote 0

HTacianas

Well-Known Member
Jul 9, 2018
8,586
9,082
Florida
✟329,308.00
Country
United States
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
@HTacianas @eleos1954 @Hammster -- consider:

Suppose one day you find out that a criminal drug dealer named Jane who lived not far from you, both her and her daughter Sarah are gone, and you read that a group of apparent vigilantes (some called a 'lynch mob') have killed both Jane and her daughter Sarah with a dramatic attack (with grenades, actually).

An obituary for Jane and her young daughter appears in the local paper....

Years pass. You grow older and it's finally time to retire.

You decide you don't like this neighborhood anymore and you want a very different life so you decide to move to a far away place, somewhere better.

So, you take a flight with all your few things you choose to keep, and fly to New Zealand.

There, in New Zealand you are amazed and delighted to meet both Jane and her daughter Sarah both quite alive and doing great, living blissful happy lives, where it's clear Jane has very much changed her life for the better!

Well, then you have to amend the belief that Ralph actually killed Jane and Sarah, as they are quite clearly alive.

I agree completely that I would have to amend the belief that Ralph killed Jane and Sarah. But I'm not sure what you mean by your analogy.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Halbhh

Everything You say is Life to me
Site Supporter
Mar 17, 2015
17,250
9,229
catholic -- embracing all Christians
✟1,168,501.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I agree completely that I would have to amend the belief that Ralph killed Jane and Sarah. But I'm not sure what you mean by your analogy.
Right, sorry. Let me put that here.

Is it Genocide?

We learn that when wicked people (and their children) die, they are not actually dead in actual reality. (not yet)

Because God exists.

So, for example, the very wicked people before the Flood, where God removed them all from the Earth -- they didn't die in a final way (not yet...) when their mortal bodies perished, but instead we read about them that they became "spirits in prison" -->

18 For Christ also suffered once for sins, the righteous for the unrighteous, to bring you to God. He was put to death in the body but made alive in the Spirit. 19 After being made alive, he went and made proclamation to the imprisoned spirits— 20 to those who were disobedient long ago when God waited patiently in the days of Noah while the ark was being built. ... -- 1rst Peter 3:18-20a

And we read that Christ Himself came to proclaim to them! (verse 19) When He had died in body on the cross but was still alive in spirit, Himself.
What did He proclaim? We read this:

6 For this is the reason the gospel was preached even to those who are now dead, so that they might be judged according to human standards in regard to the body, but live according to God in regard to the spirit. -- 1rst Peter 4:6

So, He proclaimed to the dead (dead only in body, but not in spirit) the Gospel message then!

Ergo, this whole picture isn't at all really like 'genocide' in the way humans mean the word.

Because God cancels death.
Those who die are not dead.

Instead of 'genocide' a more accurate word would be 'transportation'.

Since Genocide is a misleading term in a key way (see post #44), here's a phrase that is more helpful clear:

Penal transportation was the relocation of convicted criminals, or other persons regarded as undesirable, to a distant place, often a colony, for a specified term; later, specifically established penal colonies became their destination. While the prisoners may have been released once the sentences were served, they generally did not have the resources to return home.

Penal transportation - Wikipedia


en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
 
Upvote 0

Halbhh

Everything You say is Life to me
Site Supporter
Mar 17, 2015
17,250
9,229
catholic -- embracing all Christians
✟1,168,501.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Please try to post on topic.
Ok, re God Ordained Genocide: in our illustration, Jane and her daughter here are clearly not dead, so the accusation that Ralph successfully killed them isn't correct. In parallel, when people removed from this mortal life by God's ordaining are still alive, then it's not accurately "genocide" in the context of God, such as "God Ordained". The phrasing "God Ordained Genocide" to refer to the mass removal of a group from this mortal life on Earth contradicts the bible by suggesting that God wanted them permanently dead, and we know isn't a correct picture from 1rst Peter 3:18-20.

The illustration with Jane and her daughter helps make that clear from another angle of view. Where the 'retirement' is leaving this mortal life for heaven (New Zealand stands in in analogy here), and we will arrive to find some like Jane and her daughter Sarah.

God Ordained to be killed on Earth, but not actually dead in the final way humans imagine.
 
Upvote 0

Hammster

The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God.
Christian Forums Staff
Site Advisor
Site Supporter
Apr 5, 2007
140,864
25,329
55
New Jerusalem
Visit site
✟1,745,484.00
Country
United States
Faith
Reformed
Marital Status
Married
Upvote 0

Hammster

The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God.
Christian Forums Staff
Site Advisor
Site Supporter
Apr 5, 2007
140,864
25,329
55
New Jerusalem
Visit site
✟1,745,484.00
Country
United States
Faith
Reformed
Marital Status
Married
Right, sorry. Let me put that here.

Is it Genocide?

We learn that when wicked people (and their children) die, they are not actually dead in actual reality. (not yet)

Because God exists.

So, for example, the very wicked people before the Flood, where God removed them all from the Earth -- they didn't die in a final way (not yet...) when their mortal bodies perished, but instead we read about them that they became "spirits in prison" -->

18 For Christ also suffered once for sins, the righteous for the unrighteous, to bring you to God. He was put to death in the body but made alive in the Spirit. 19 After being made alive, he went and made proclamation to the imprisoned spirits— 20 to those who were disobedient long ago when God waited patiently in the days of Noah while the ark was being built. ... -- 1rst Peter 3:18-20a

And we read that Christ Himself came to proclaim to them! (verse 19) When He had died in body on the cross but was still alive in spirit, Himself.
What did He proclaim? We read this:

6 For this is the reason the gospel was preached even to those who are now dead, so that they might be judged according to human standards in regard to the body, but live according to God in regard to the spirit. -- 1rst Peter 4:6

So, He proclaimed to the dead (dead only in body, but not in spirit) the Gospel message then!

Ergo, this whole picture isn't at all really like 'genocide' in the way humans mean the word.

Because God cancels death.
Those who die are not dead.

Instead of 'genocide' a more accurate word would be 'transportation'.

Since Genocide is a misleading term in a key way (see post #44), here's a phrase that is more helpful clear:

Penal transportation was the relocation of convicted criminals, or other persons regarded as undesirable, to a distant place, often a colony, for a specified term; later, specifically established penal colonies became their destination. While the prisoners may have been released once the sentences were served, they generally did not have the resources to return home.

Penal transportation - Wikipedia


en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
So we captured all his cities at that time and devoted to destruction the men, women, and little ones of every city. We left no survivor remaining.
— Deuteronomy 2:34
 
Upvote 0

Halbhh

Everything You say is Life to me
Site Supporter
Mar 17, 2015
17,250
9,229
catholic -- embracing all Christians
✟1,168,501.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Right. So it doesn’t matter what it’s called. Now maybe we can get back to the OP.
It seems to matter a lot to atheists who use it as the by far most common argument against God existing, and here I'm trying to point out that misnomer involved.

It would be accurate (and more accurate) to call it instead a "removal" instead of a "genocide" because to all (including those interested in God) who don't yet know God, they take it to mean God destroys even innocent unfairly, while we know that's not what the scriptures say. So, we should change our own wordings to be accurate to scripture in a way that the lost can also be helped to learn about God. God "removed" the wicked and their children, instead of simply killing them and leaving them dead forever.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Halbhh

Everything You say is Life to me
Site Supporter
Mar 17, 2015
17,250
9,229
catholic -- embracing all Christians
✟1,168,501.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
So we captured all his cities at that time and devoted to destruction the men, women, and little ones of every city. We left no survivor remaining.
— Deuteronomy 2:34
Yes, and even the livestock were to be destroyed also in some cities, and even the gold and silver of certain cities was not to be kept but instead thrown into the bonfire.

I haven't time now to give a more extensive reply at the moment, but from the mainstream Ellicott's and Pulpit commentaries on 1 Peter 3:19 - Suffering for Righteousness are useful to learn more about where the dead who aren't yet finally judged but also are not yet redeemed will be.

See Ellicott's and Pulpit commentaries at bottom of this page:

Ergo, it makes sense to the whole of scripture then that of course Christ can choose to preach the gospel (as we read was proclaimed) to any grouping of this location which He chooses, even some or many from among the Canaanite cities whose inhabitants were removed from this life to what's next for them. Can't rule that out, even though those cities we read were guilty of the most extreme of evils, as per Deuteronomy 12:31.
 
Upvote 0

Hammster

The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God.
Christian Forums Staff
Site Advisor
Site Supporter
Apr 5, 2007
140,864
25,329
55
New Jerusalem
Visit site
✟1,745,484.00
Country
United States
Faith
Reformed
Marital Status
Married
It seems to matter a lot to atheists who use it as the by far most common argument against God existing, and here I'm trying to point out that misnomer involved.

It would be accurate (and more accurate) to call it instead a "removal" instead of a "genocide" because to all (including those interested in God) who don't yet know God, they take it to mean God destroys even innocent unfairly, while we know that's not what the scriptures say. So, we should change our own wordings to be accurate to scripture in a way that the lost can also be helped to learn about God. God "removed" the wicked and their children, instead of simply killing them and leaving them dead forever.
Atheists aren’t in this thread. So either address the OP, or please move on.
 
Upvote 0

Hammster

The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God.
Christian Forums Staff
Site Advisor
Site Supporter
Apr 5, 2007
140,864
25,329
55
New Jerusalem
Visit site
✟1,745,484.00
Country
United States
Faith
Reformed
Marital Status
Married
Yes, and even the livestock were to be destroyed also in some cities, and even the gold and silver of certain cities was not to be kept but instead thrown into the bonfire.

I haven't time now to give a more extensive reply at the moment, but from the mainstream Ellicott's and Pulpit commentaries on 1 Peter 3:19 - Suffering for Righteousness are useful to learn more about where the dead who aren't yet finally judged but also are not yet redeemed will be.

See Ellicott's and Pulpit commentaries at bottom of this page:

Ergo, it makes sense to the whole of scripture then that of course Christ can choose to preach the gospel (as we read was proclaimed) to any grouping of this location which He chooses, even some or many from among the Canaanite cities whose inhabitants were removed from this life to what's next for them. Can't rule that out, even though those cities we read were guilty of the most extreme of evils, as per Deuteronomy 12:31.
None of this is relevant to the OP.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums