- Oct 16, 2023
- 1,073
- 187
- 67
- Country
- Canada
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- In Relationship
You call people what you like. I would call people that believe bible prophesy and dismiss proven false prophets sane and rational and godly.... we call them "climate deniers." Maybe your coven is different, but most aren't.
False prophesies were never validated. The predictions that did come close have no validity because they did not evidence the cause. And they were part of a collection of predictions that covered all possibilities. (except the truth). Along comes you, who tries to lift out of this pile only predictions that seem to have been close! No. You must stand behind the whole pile of 'science based' predictions.That's the difference between science and superstition. In science, when predictions are validated by evidence they are accepted as true.
No. we don't! We reject all prophets and groups of prophets containing false prophets, as charlatans and cads and bible hatersIf you think so, she fooled you.
And we accept the predictions of the great majority of climatologists because their predictions were confirmed by subsequent events.
There will always be those who don't agree. Point is, most climatologists, even in the 1970s, were correct in predicting warming, while deniers were predicting cooling. If you're smart, you go with the guys who have a record of getting it right.
How many of those people you labeled 'deniers' deny a warming trend? Ha.Not all deniers claim to be prophets. Most of them are merely wrong, not religious cranks.
Grabbing a few predictions from a heap of predictions of various and conflicting variety is not confirming anything. It is displaying cognitive dissonance and denial and stubborn rebellion against God and His word as well as reality.Polls don't determine science. Predictions that are confirmed determine science.
No one cares what a supposed majority in a pile of prophets (many of whom were ridiculously false) think. Sorry to break that to you.It just so happens that the great majority of climatologists got it right even 50 years ago. For example, James Hanson correctly predicted the warming climate about 30 years in advance, using nothing but CO2 emissions.
Theories that have no basis in evidence such as why the cause of a warming trend must be solely due to man and farting cows may be cherished and accepted and worshiped by some people wearing a science tee shirt. However, the festering pile of false prophesies and prophets that make up part of science are rejected by honest people out of hand.In science, it's the only deal. Theories that work are accepted. Those that don't work are discarded.
Believers will never accept lies and flimsy false science plucked carefully from a pile that is riddled with false predictions and overtly godless 'agenda over truth and actual science' types.
Upvote
0