Ophiolite
Recalcitrant Procrastinating Ape
Response to your first paragraph: You have erected a strawman. No scientist would claim that life could arise in any such environment, or in such a short time frame. You are either misinformed, or deliberately misrepresenting how scientists envisage the process of abiogenesis. I have taken care of the first option, so there should be no need for you to ever re-use that strawman.Let’s say I take an average rock, soak it in bleach and leave it to dry in a sterile environment,then ensure that I remove or kill all microorganisms on its surface; then place it into a airtight, vacuum chamber and leave it sit for 1000 years.If that airtight, vacuum chamber is opened,and examined microscopically, there will still be no life.Same scenario in space.
In the hypothetical “atheist” universe-creation scenario, the Big Bang occurs and matter is spontaneously created, now we have elements and matter,BUT that matter is NOT living,it’s just energetically fueled and controlled, there is no life nor biotic matter. Ice and water can form because they are a combination of hydrogen and oxygen,but they cannot produce nor sustain life.
Energy itself is not living or biotic.
Response to your second paragraph: You have erected another strawman. (Is this your super-power? ) Matter is not spontaneously created, but transformed from energy as the universe cools.
What also form are scores of different organic molecules, under the right conditions that we can, and routinely do, duplicate in the laboratory these molecules can grow in complexity, polymerise and engage in autocatalytic reactions, all processes that can be shown as plausible first steps towards the emergence of self replicating organsims. i.e. life.
You may repeatedlydeny the truth of this, but you would be mistaken.
Response to your third paragraph: No on said is was. Another strawman?
Upvote
0