- Jun 4, 2013
- 10,132
- 996
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Non-Denom
- Marital Status
- Widowed
- Politics
- US-Others
Sounds to me like you and LM are both ignoring the fact you know the twins clocks are slowing as he accelerates.... we all understand the twin can't tell his clocks are changing. But you, if you understand Relativity, know without a doubt the twins clocks are changing as he accelerates. So you are willingly ignoring what you know to be true, for the perspective of someone who can't even tell his clocks are changing. Even when he returns to the stationary frame it's made quite clear to him he was wrong.Sounds like are completely ignoring the relativistic reality of the frame of reference LM is talking about.
As a matter of fact the twin in motion is so wrong he thinks the stationary twins clocks are slowing, yet the stationary twins clocks never change, he is stationary and the control in the experiment to show it was acceleration which caused clocks to change. The twin in motion can't perceive anything correctly.
EDIT: So why are you persisting in the mindset of the twin in motion when you know he is wrong about everything he thinks is true?
Last edited:
Upvote
0