I provided the article as proof that what I am saying is not something I just made up. The version of the argument which intends to prove a logical inconsistency between the existence of evil and God is a version that has largely been abandoned in favor of less ambitious ones which focus not on the existence of evil per se, but the existence of certain types of evil or certain amounts of it.
And no, if something already exists which says what I aim to get across, I will copy and paste it and reference it because that is the best way for me to get my point across. Turning attention to how I deliver my argument to you instead of addressing the argument is to introduce a red herring into the mix.
Just tell me if you think these articles are wrong and if so, where is their error?
This is exactly what I was talking about. You're just playing postman between me and the source material you think addresses my argument, without actually addressing my argument yourself.
How about you explaining to me in your own words how your source material addresses my argument.
Upvote
0