• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Republicans take aim at SNAP benefits in growing fight over federal debt

essentialsaltes

Fact-Based Lifeform
Oct 17, 2011
41,500
44,623
Los Angeles Area
✟994,696.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Legal Union (Other)
Top House Republicans are exploring significant changes to the nation’s food stamps program, including benefit cuts and stricter work requirements, as some in the new majority scramble for ways to slash government spending this year.

The emerging GOP campaign arrives at a pivotal moment for the nutrition program, which is set to cease providing emergency pandemic payments this March. Congress terminated the allotments as part of a $1.7 trillion deal to fund the government reached at the end of last year, though some states — including Arizona, Florida and Mississippi — already had returned SNAP benefits to their normal amounts. [But some in the GOP are looking to cut even more.]

A key federal law that authorizes agricultural subsidies and nutrition programs including SNAP is set to expire at the end of September. Lawmakers must approve some sort of extension before Oct. 1, or enact a newer version of the measure, known colloquially in the Capitol as the “farm bill.” Otherwise, millions of farmers and families alike could experience significant economic disruptions this fall.

Firing an early warning shot, a group of five conservatives led by Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-Fla.) last week cited the country’s “untenable” debt levels as they called for new “work requirements as a feature of welfare reform.” They specifically pointed to the need to make “structural reforms of SNAP,” saying such rules would restore “dignity” for beneficiaries.
 

Attachments

  • 1676667665176.png
    1676667665176.png
    214.9 KB · Views: 20

Pommer

CoPacEtiC SkEpTic
Sep 13, 2008
22,183
13,691
Earth
✟236,420.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Deist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Democrat
Top House Republicans are exploring significant changes to the nation’s food stamps program, including benefit cuts and stricter work requirements, as some in the new majority scramble for ways to slash government spending this year.

The emerging GOP campaign arrives at a pivotal moment for the nutrition program, which is set to cease providing emergency pandemic payments this March. Congress terminated the allotments as part of a $1.7 trillion deal to fund the government reached at the end of last year, though some states — including Arizona, Florida and Mississippi — already had returned SNAP benefits to their normal amounts. [But some in the GOP are looking to cut even more.]

A key federal law that authorizes agricultural subsidies and nutrition programs including SNAP is set to expire at the end of September. Lawmakers must approve some sort of extension before Oct. 1, or enact a newer version of the measure, known colloquially in the Capitol as the “farm bill.” Otherwise, millions of farmers and families alike could experience significant economic disruptions this fall.

Firing an early warning shot, a group of five conservatives led by Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-Fla.) last week cited the country’s “untenable” debt levels as they called for new “work requirements as a feature of welfare reform.” They specifically pointed to the need to make “structural reforms of SNAP,” saying such rules would restore “dignity” for beneficiaries.
Wow, yes, let us kick off these “food cheats” and save the 1.29% (of the federal budget).
 
Upvote 0

HTacianas

Well-Known Member
Jul 9, 2018
8,876
9,490
Florida
✟369,199.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
Top House Republicans are exploring significant changes to the nation’s food stamps program, including benefit cuts and stricter work requirements, as some in the new majority scramble for ways to slash government spending this year.

The emerging GOP campaign arrives at a pivotal moment for the nutrition program, which is set to cease providing emergency pandemic payments this March. Congress terminated the allotments as part of a $1.7 trillion deal to fund the government reached at the end of last year, though some states — including Arizona, Florida and Mississippi — already had returned SNAP benefits to their normal amounts. [But some in the GOP are looking to cut even more.]

A key federal law that authorizes agricultural subsidies and nutrition programs including SNAP is set to expire at the end of September. Lawmakers must approve some sort of extension before Oct. 1, or enact a newer version of the measure, known colloquially in the Capitol as the “farm bill.” Otherwise, millions of farmers and families alike could experience significant economic disruptions this fall.

Firing an early warning shot, a group of five conservatives led by Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-Fla.) last week cited the country’s “untenable” debt levels as they called for new “work requirements as a feature of welfare reform.” They specifically pointed to the need to make “structural reforms of SNAP,” saying such rules would restore “dignity” for beneficiaries.

How long should emergency pandemic payments continue now that the pandemic is over?
 
Upvote 0

iluvatar5150

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Aug 3, 2012
29,347
29,000
Baltimore
✟742,563.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
If Republicans were really concerned about encouraging work, they’d do something about the way that benefits abruptly get cut off once you hit an income threshold, like what’s described here. If you want to incentivize work, you’ll phase out the benefits slowly so that it still pays to take on work.

If you’re only looking for ways to make it harder to get benefits, then you’re only looking for ways to make the lives of poor people more miserable.
 
Upvote 0

Pommer

CoPacEtiC SkEpTic
Sep 13, 2008
22,183
13,691
Earth
✟236,420.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Deist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Democrat
If Republicans were really concerned about encouraging work, they’d do something about the way that benefits abruptly get cut off once you hit an income threshold, like what’s described here. If you want to incentivize work, you’ll phase out the benefits slowly so that it still pays to take on work.

If you’re only looking for ways to make it harder to get benefits, then you’re only looking for ways to make the lives of poor people more miserable.
The only “sin” in capitalism is being poor.
Hence the poor should be miserable, otherwise why would they work hard to be “not poor” and thus “happy”?
 
  • Like
Reactions: iluvatar5150
Upvote 0