Other red states with rural populations have resisted school choice in public referenda, even as they went for Trump.
Ballot measures to expand the "school choice" agenda "lost in three states in the November election, including in two that went strongly for Trump, Kentucky and Nebraska. The results suggest a divide between Republican lawmakers and voters, many of whom have said in opinion surveys that they are generally dissatisfied with what they view as a 'woke' agenda in public education [propaganda] but still like their own children’s local schools, [actual experience]" said the report.
School voucher schemes, said Indiana University education policy professor Christopher Lubienski, “are popular with politicians. But voters tend to push back pretty hard.” One key reason is that a core constituency of Republicans, that being more rural areas, often don't have the population or resources to support a network of private schools.
--
As for Texas itself, Governor Abbott has successfully primaried rural Republican legislators who thwarted his plans in the past.
Last year, House lawmakers
voted 84-63 to strip from a massive education funding bill a provision to establish
education savings accounts, a voucher-like program that would have offered parents tax dollars to pay for their child’s private schooling and other educational expenses.
Twenty-one Republicans, most of whom represented rural school districts, joined all House Democrats to oppose the legislation over fears that such a proposal would undercut the funding public schools rely upon.
Abbott vowed to use the March primary election cycle to campaign against the rural Republicans who helped block his plan. He did so with the support of people like
Pennsylvania billionaire Jeff Yass
Abbott’s reluctance to fully fund public education last legislative session — even with a record
$32 billion budget surplus — caused many public school districts to enter this school year with multimillion-dollar deficit budgets while also tussling with rising costs of living
School voucher programs across the country, however, do not always accomplish what their proponents describe. While the country’s first voucher programs launched in the late 20th century with the goal of helping vulnerable students, many of the children who benefit from some of the more expansive programs today come from
wealthier families who already pay for private school tuition. Meanwhile, families
who reside in poor communities often do not use vouchers.
Give to the rich and do nothing for the poor! We will see this in action on the national stage soon, when I feel certain the extension of the Trump tax cuts [which benefit the rich a lot and the poor very little] will be job #1 on the Congressional agenda.