probinson
Legend
- Aug 16, 2005
- 22,338
- 2,974
- 46
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Word of Faith
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Others
Uh, of course scientists are going to discuss the evolving evidence as it comes in.
Yeah, that's not at all what they were doing.
Calling that "working behind the scenes" seems like quite the stretch, though.
Not really. If it were a fair question (it always was and it STILL IS to this day), why did they work so hard to try to classify it as a "conspiracy theory"? As I said in another post, the cover up is always worse. If they had allowed regular discussion and not enlisted big tech and social media to censor any discussion on the topic as "disinformation", then there would be far less of a concern. But it's a very valid question to ask why they were so adamant that the theory of a lab-leak not even be allowed to be discussed in the public square without censorship.
Upvote
0