A few questions for Protestants

Fidelibus

Well-Known Member
Jan 4, 2017
1,185
300
67
U.S.A.
✟66,007.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Private
I thought the previous verse established that truth came from God alone and not man, and this was the foundation His church would be built upon.
After reading my post over, I suppose that I could have worded it differently. The point I was trying to get across to QVQ's post #1251 where it said: "The Popes are not Peter." was that St. Peter was the first Pope of the Catholic Church, the Church established by Jesus Himself.

As for Matt. 16:17: "Jesus said to him in reply, "Blessed are you, Simon son of Jonah. For flesh and blood has not revealed this to you, but my heavenly Father."

What do you think Jesus' response reveals to the reader?

Have a Blessed Day
 
Upvote 0

QvQ

Member
Aug 18, 2019
1,713
742
AZ
✟105,131.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
"The Popes are not Peter." was that St. Peter was the first Pope of the Catholic Church, the Church established by Jesus Himself.
Pope means "father"
God is the Father.
The Holy Ghost is the Person of the Trinity who is the Father of the Church.

In that line of succession a human pope would be claiming the power of Father, Son, and Holy Ghost
Is the RCC claiming the pope is the successor of Christ or that Christ appointed Peter as the Holy Ghost?
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

timothyu

Well-Known Member
Dec 31, 2018
22,699
8,498
up there
✟311,386.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
What do you think Jesus' response reveals to the reader?
It reveals that God gave Simon the notion that Jesus was more than a prophet (yet interestingly he still thought as Messiah that Jesus' Kingdom would be in earth). Yet although Peter, a Jew and through no fault of his own, was adopted by gentiles as political head of their world government, it was the Jesus dynasty that ran the original church, that being the church of Jerusalem, which James, not Simon, then his brothers were the heads of.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: BPPLEE
Upvote 0

timothyu

Well-Known Member
Dec 31, 2018
22,699
8,498
up there
✟311,386.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
In that line of succession a human pope would be claiming the power of Father, Son, and Holy Ghost
Is the RCC claiming the pope is the successor of Christ or that Christ appointed Peter as the Holy Ghost?
Things get a little off track when people, as time goes by, forget the circumstances at the time these things happened. There may have been elders in the myriad of various Christian communities before they amalgamated under Constantine but there was no solid line. What came later was a matter of reverse engineering. Consider what happened when these communities incorporated, rejected the Kingdom and re-aligned themselves with the enemy, the world of man taking the offer that Jesus refused in the desert.

The leader of their human world was know as a Caesar. It was only logical to give a name denoting the same to the partner church which had become Constantine's political tool to glue the Empire together. Caesars claimed to be representatives of God , let alone gods themselves, so why not the heads of the amalgamated gentile church? (which of course was a concept that came later as the civil war between the Latin Empire that lost under Constantine, and the winners, the Greek side of the Empire, resumed in later years on a religious level... Roman vs Orthodox, Pope vs Patriarch) But before this occurred, they both worked in union with a Caesar, not for the Kingdom but for the Empire, until a point the church overtook the Empire to become a worldly king maker itself and empire in its own right. It all becomes a matter of tradition as time went on and nowadays we have an entirely different human truth being offered.

This is why Jesus said truth only comes from the Father and not from man. We cannot trust any of our institutions. They will choose self over Kingdom every time. The same reason why Protestant broke from Catholic and fragmented into thousands of pieces.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: BPPLEE
Upvote 0

JulieB67

Well-Known Member
Apr 21, 2020
1,617
752
56
Ohio US
✟154,014.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
was that St. Peter was the first Pope of the Catholic Church, the Church established by Jesus Himself.
I'll repost my post from the last page that states what our foundation is without a doubt.

For a Christian, what is the pillar and ground of the truth - i.e., the upholder and foundation of the truth? Is it the Bible?
If you're going by this verse -

I Timothy 3:15 "But if I tarry long, that thou mayest know how thou oughtest to behave thyself in the house of God, which is the church of the living God, the pillar and ground of the truth."

The church is the many membered body that holds to the traditions that Christ/prophets/apostles brought forth. And I'll say there are few and far between churches today that bring forth that truth- nothing less, nothing more. That's what the true and early church were founded on.
Thankfully the church today can still meet anywhere as long as they are grounded in the same truths brought forth. Not traditions of men that make void the word of God.

Ephesians 2:19 "Now therefore ye are no more strangers and foreigners, but fellow citizens with the saints, and of the household of God;"

Ephesians 2:20 "And are built upon the foundation of the apostles and prophets, Jesus Christ Himself being the chief corner stone;"


If your church has in any way swayed from their teachings or added new ones I don't think they can be included in the true church. Which again this is the many membered body that holds to the traditions that were brought forth by Christ and the prophets/apostles. This goes for any denomination/church. I left mine when they taught false doctrines that could not be backed up by what Christ/prophets/apostles taught.

Paul wrote 1st Timothy 3:15 but he also wrote this-

Acts 20:29 "For I know this, that after my departing shall grievous wolves enter in among you, not sparing the flock."

We have to use the Word of God to back up anything one is teaching to see if it is contrary to what Christ and the prophets/apostles brought forth.

Paul says hold to the traditions they brought forth.

II Thessalonians 2:15 "Therefore, brethren, stand fast, and hold the traditions which ye have been taught, whether by word, or our epistle."

It doesn't state we are to add to those traditions. There is no need to. Christ's ministry which he told the disciples to spread to the world is perfect. Paul and others certainly can add their own personal advice but they usually noted when doing so.

But if a church has veered off course it's our own responsibility to back up what they state is truth.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

timothyu

Well-Known Member
Dec 31, 2018
22,699
8,498
up there
✟311,386.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
If your church has in any way swayed from their teachings or added new ones I don't think they can be included in the true church.
Quite logical considering the original church was simply a way of life, loving all as self and promoting the will of God over the selfish will of man. 2000 years and the world is still consumed with greed, especially in America where division is rife over self interest rather than the religious center it believes itself to be. There is no center in the world of man. The Kingdom has not yet come, His will not yet done in earth as it is in Heaven.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JulieB67
Upvote 0

timothyu

Well-Known Member
Dec 31, 2018
22,699
8,498
up there
✟311,386.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
Christianity is not a belief system but something that happens to you, a way of life. Your life begins to change. You start to love things you hated and hate things you used to loved. You are set free from the traditions of man that kept you in line. You don't become perfect but you do change and that change will continue as long as you live.

You grow in the ways of the Kingdom of God rather than the ways (traditions) of man. Are the mockers and venomous here growing in that way? Being born again in this life to the understanding of an alternative Kingdom is freedom from bondage and fear, and not a list of rules like man uses to convince you it is for your own good. Selflessness, not self.
 
Upvote 0

keepitsimple144

Well-Known Member
Feb 17, 2024
491
72
midwest
✟11,297.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
For a Christian, what is the pillar and ground of the truth - i.e., the upholder and foundation of the truth? Is it the Bible?
He who overcomes, I will make him a pillar in the temple of My God; Rev 3:12

James, Cephas and John, those esteemed as pillars, gave me and Barnabas the right hand of fellowship (Laying on of hands 2 Tim 1:6) when they recognized the grace given to me. Gal 2:9

In the same way, the gospel is bearing fruit and growing throughout the whole world—just as it has been doing among you since the day you heard it and truly understood God’s grace. Col 1:6
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Fidelibus

Well-Known Member
Jan 4, 2017
1,185
300
67
U.S.A.
✟66,007.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Private
Pope means "father"
The name "pope" comes from a Latin and Greek word meaning "father."

God is the Father.

Yes

The Holy Ghost is the Person of the Trinity who is the Father of the Church.

The Catholic Church teaches the Holy Spirit is a divine person, one of the three members of the Holy Trinity (Father, Son and Holy Spirit). The Holy Trinity is three divine persons in one God, with each person wholly possessing the same divine nature—thus their unity.

Each member of the Trinity is a divine spirit, but one member is named the “Holy Spirit,” clearly revealed to us by God the Son in the New Testament. Jesus, God the Son who is also known as the Incarnate Word, sent the Holy Spirit on Pentecost (John 16:13; see Acts 2), which is known as the birthday of the Church, i.e., the day “the Church was made manifest to the world” (CCC 1076).

For more on what Catholics believe about the Holy Spirit, check out the Catechism of the Catholic Church, Chapter 687.

in that line of succession a human pope would be claiming the power of Father, Son, and Holy Ghost

100% incorrect!

In case it’s not obvious, Catholics know that every Pope is only human like the rest of us. Even though he has an essential role in God’s plan, the Pope can make bad decisions both in his personal life and in managing the Church. Many Popes have been declared saints because of their great Christian virtue, but even the most saintly Pope isn’t perfect. After all, St. Peter himself denied Jesus three times.

Is the RCC claiming the pope is the successor of Christ or that Christ appointed Peter as the Holy Ghost?

To understand what Catholics truly believe regarding the Pope, I suggest going online to the Catechism of the Catholic Church and read Paragraphs #882-896.

This includes all the Rites of the Catholic Church, not just the Latin Rite that you have suggested.


Have a Blessed Day!
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Fidelibus

Well-Known Member
Jan 4, 2017
1,185
300
67
U.S.A.
✟66,007.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Private
Should have said 'when.'

the door to know love and serve God.

As a Catholic, my belief of Matt.7:7 when Jesus says, "knock and the door will be opened to you," the door is the door to heaven and eternal life which had been closed since the Fall and had not been opened until the coming of the Christ.

Matthew 5:8 Blessed are the pure in heart for they shall see God

I love the Beatitudes!

Matthew 6:33 But seek ye first the kingdom of God, and his righteousness; and all these things shall be added unto you.

Jesus does not deny the reality of human needs (Mt 6:32) but forbids making them the object of anxious care and, in effect, becoming their slave.

There is a difference between Preaching and Teaching.

Could you please give your reason as to why?

There is a difference between Believe and Faith.

For we Catholics, the word “faith” can be used equivocally, i.e., in more than one way. It can refer to belief in the truths that God has revealed and that the Church has otherwise proposed for our belief. See Catechism of the Catholic Church, (CCC) 1814.

However, we also see that the virtue of faith also includes our freely and entirely committing ourselves to God (CCC 1814). So, there is an element of trust in faith, which is extended via the theological virtue of hope, whereby “we desire the kingdom of heaven and eternal life as our happiness, placing our trust in Christ’s promises [including his raising us from the dead on the last day], and relying not on our own strength, but on the help of the grace of the Holy Spirit” (CCC 1817).

Understanding faith as both belief and trust is advanced by the author of the Letter to the Hebrews: “Now faith is the assurance of things hoped for, the conviction of things not seen” (Hebrews 11:1).

Regarding what we believe as Catholics and how to live our faith, the (CCC) provides a thorough treatment to help answer any questions you may have in that regard. The four sections of the CCC are derived from Acts 2:42: “And they devoted themselves to the apostles’ teaching and fellowship, to the breaking of bread and the prayers.” The apostles’ teaching regards “The Profession of Faith” section of the CCC, fellowship to the “Life in Christ” section, the breaking of bread to the Eucharist in particular and “The Celebration of the Christian Mystery” section in general, and the prayers to the “Christian Prayer” section.

Regarding how we live our faith, a few gospel words from our Lord Jesus Christ are instructive: But seek first his kingdom and his righteousness, and all these things shall be yours as well. (Matt. 6:33). Jesus then said to the Jews who had believed in him, “If you continue in my word, you are truly my disciples, and you will know the truth, and the truth will make you free” (John 8:31-32). Peace I leave with you; my peace I give to you; not as the world gives do I give to you. Let not your hearts be troubled, neither let them be afraid (John 14:27). And finally a word from St. Paul: “I can do all things in him who strengthens me” (Phil. 4:13).

Belief can be taught.

In what way, and by whom?

Faith is by the Grace of God.

To you, what is a good definition of faith and Grace?

Have a Blessed Day!
 
Upvote 0

QvQ

Member
Aug 18, 2019
1,713
742
AZ
✟105,131.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Could you please give your reason as to why?
The CCC is teaching. Reading the Bible is preaching.
I had a friend who couldn't read. All his life he had people telling him what the Bible said.
Teaching him their version.
I took him to the library and the librarian helped him check out an audio tape of the Bible.
He was enchanted by the tapes.
The Word of God. Preached to him alone.

I am not going to debate Catholic Doctrine.
I studied Catholicism at one point, reading Augustine, Aquinas and Merton.
I was raised atheist. However I was baptized Catholic at the insistence of very devout Catholic grandparents.
So as an converted atheist, I had incentive to adopt the church of my fathers.
However the Catholic Church is so encrusted with "tradition" it is nearly impossible for anyone who was not raised Catholic to be Catholic.

Note that you are trying to teach me Catholic.
Christianity is what the Catholic Church says it is and it has to be learned, according to the Catholics.

God and Faith, by the Grace of God is revealed.
God reveals Himself, through His Word and in the truth of the corresponding reality.
 
  • Like
Reactions: timothyu
Upvote 0

Fidelibus

Well-Known Member
Jan 4, 2017
1,185
300
67
U.S.A.
✟66,007.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Private
If you're going by this verse -

I Timothy 3:15 "But if I tarry long, that thou mayest know how thou oughtest to behave thyself in the house of God, which is the church of the living God, the pillar and ground of the truth."

The church is the many membered body that holds to the traditions that Christ/prophets/apostles brought forth. And I'll say there are few and far between churches today that bring forth that truth- nothing less, nothing more.

If I may, here are some briefs from the Catechism of the Catholic Church regarding the Church

777 The word "Church" means "convocation." It designates the assembly of those whom God's Word "convokes," i.e., gathers together to form the People of God, and who themselves, nourished with the Body of Christ, become the Body of Christ.

778 The Church is both the means and the goal of God's plan: prefigured in creation, prepared for in the Old Covenant, founded by the words and actions of Jesus Christ, fulfilled by his redeeming cross and his Resurrection, the Church has been manifested as the mystery of salvation by the outpouring of the Holy Spirit. She will be perfected in the glory of heaven as the assembly of all the redeemed of the earth (cf. Rev 14:4).

779 The Church is both visible and spiritual, a hierarchical society and the Mystical Body of Christ. She is one, yet formed of two components, human and divine. That is her mystery, which only faith can accept.

780 The Church in this world is the sacrament of salvation, the sign and the instrument of the communion of God and men.

And I'll say there are few and far between churches today that bring forth that truth- nothing less, nothing more.

So, if what you say above is true, how would you explain the thousands of different Protestant, non-denominational, Independent churches and sects that have varying beliefs of the truth?

That's what the true and early church were founded on.

Jesus founded His Church on St. Peter as the “Rock” and head of the Apostles, who would be the pillars of the Church Jesus founded, with Him as the Head and we, as the members of His Body. (Mt. 16: 13-19; Jn 20: 15-19. 1 Cor. 12:27. Col 1:18.)

Thankfully the church today can still meet anywhere as long as they are grounded in the same truths brought forth.

Again, if this were true, how would you explain the thousands of different Protestant, non-denominational, Independent churches and sects that have varying beliefs of the truth?

Not traditions of men that make void the word of God.

I would assume you are referring to Matt. 15:6; Mark 7:8, and Col. 2:8. If so, Jesus did say that the Pharisees nullified God’s word for the sake of their tradition, but he did not condemn tradition itself. Indeed, Scripture’s attitude toward apostolic Tradition is positive. Tradition is important to every person and every group of people. It represents our education, our culture, everything that has been handed on to us from previous generations. Tradition is—by definition—what is handed on. The term comes from the Latin word tradere, “to hand on.”

Some traditions, like some of the Pharisees’ traditions, can be harmful. Others, being of merely human origin, are not authoritative. Scripture lumps both under the heading “traditions of men.” But not all traditions are in this category. For Christians, the Faith handed down to us from Christ and the apostles is of unparalleled importance. In this passing down of the Faith is referred to as “Sacred Tradition” or “Apostolic Tradition” (with a capital “T” to distinguish it from other, lesser, “lowercase” traditions).

Initially, the apostles handed on the Faith orally—by preaching— but with time some of them and their associates wrote the New Testament documents, which together with the Old Testament comprise Sacred Scripture. Since Scripture has been handed down to us from the apostles, it is the inspired, written part of Sacred Tradition. Whether or not an item of Tradition was written in Scripture, it is still important and binding. Thus the New Testament exhorts the reader to maintain Sacred Tradition (1 Cor. 11:2; 2 Thess. 3:6), and in 2 Thessalonians 2:15, Paul tells his readers to “stand firm and hold to the Traditions which you were taught by us, either by word of mouth or by letter.”

Another noteworthy passage is 2 Tim. 2:2, in which Paul instructs his protégé, “what you have heard from me before many witnesses entrust to faithful men who will be able to teach others also.” Bearing in mind that Paul wrote this letter just before he died (cf. 2 Tim. 4:6–8), Paul is exhorting the transmission of Sacred Tradition across generations of Christian leaders—from his generation to Timothy’s generation, to the ones that will follow.

Ephesians 2:19 "Now therefore ye are no more strangers and foreigners, but fellow citizens with the saints, and of the household of God;"

Ephesians 2:20 "And are built upon the foundation of the apostles and prophets, Jesus Christ Himself being the chief corner stone;"

The divisions among peoples and their nations are now removed because all who profess Jesus as Lord and Savior are citizens of Christ's Kingdom of the Church and members of God's holy family—the "household of God." It is a "household" built upon the foundation laid down by the Apostles and Christian prophets (Ephesians 6:5; Mt 5:17; Lk 24:27, 44-45; CCC 542-43).

If your church has in any way swayed from their teachings or added new ones I don't think they can be included in the true church. Which again this is the many membered body that holds to the traditions that were brought forth by Christ and the prophets/apostles. This goes for any denomination/church. I left mine when they taught false doctrines that could not be backed up by what Christ/prophets/apostles taught.

By who's or what authority did you determine the church you left was teaching "false doctrines"? Also, how can you be sure the church you presently attend is not teaching false doctrines as well? By who's or what authority do you believe, to be sure?

Paul wrote 1st Timothy 3:15 but he also wrote this-
Acts 20:29 "For I know this, that after my departing shall grievous wolves enter in among you, not sparing the flock."

So, what do you believe are the main points of Paul's address in verses 17-35?

We have to use the Word of God to back up anything one is teaching to see if it is contrary to what Christ and the prophets/apostles brought forth.

Interesting. So again, I must ask, who is it you believe has the authority to make that determination? Your Pastor? Yourself?
Paul says hold to the traditions they brought forth.

Yes, 2 Thessalonians 2:15. Paul tells his readers to “stand firm and hold to the Traditions which you were taught by us, either by "word of mouth" or by letter.

Have a Blessed Day!
 
  • Like
Reactions: jas3
Upvote 0

Fidelibus

Well-Known Member
Jan 4, 2017
1,185
300
67
U.S.A.
✟66,007.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Private
He who overcomes, I will make him a pillar in the temple of My God; Rev 3:12
The two pillars of the Temple at the entrance to the Sanctuary's Holy Place were named (1 Kings 7:21). The pillar on the right was Yachin (or Jachin which means "He shall establish") and the one on the left was Boaz ("in Him is strength") and can correspond to the shoulders of the high priest's ephod which were inscribed with the names of the twelve tribes of Israel (Ex 28:9-12). All this Old Covenant Temple symbolism is brought together in the Book of Revelation. The faithful overcomer is a firmly "established" pillar of "strength" in God's heavenly Temple. The faithful of the New Covenant Kingdom have been redeemed from their wandering ("and it will stay forever") and are characterized by permanence and stability (see Jer 1:18, 1 Tim 3:15).

How many times does Jesus refer to Himself in verses 12-13?

James, Cephas and John, those esteemed as pillars, gave me and Barnabas the right hand of fellowship (Laying on of hands 2 Tim 1:6) when they recognized the grace given to me. Gal 2:9

In 2 Tim. 1:6, "For this reason" refers to Timothy's sincere faith. Paul reminds him of the fullness of grace he received from the Holy Spirit when Paul and a gathering of Church elders ordained him to his priestly ministry as a bishop by the imposition of hands. He must use that power to stir into flame the gift of God to courageously complete his mission in Ephesus. Then as now in the Church, the imposing or "laying on of hands" signifies a transfer of spiritual power.

In Gal.2:7–9, Some think that actual “minutes” of the meeting are here quoted. Paul’s apostleship to the Gentiles (Gal 1:16) is recognized alongside that of Peter to the Jews. Moreover, the right to proclaim the gospel without requiring circumcision and the Jewish law is sealed by a handshake. That Paul and colleagues should go to the Gentiles did not exclude his preaching to the Jews as well (Rom 1:13–16) or Cephas to Gentile areas.

in the same way, the gospel is bearing fruit and growing throughout the whole world—just as it has been doing among you since the day you heard it and truly understood God’s grace. Col 1:6

In Col. 1:5-6, he congratulates them on their acceptance of Christ and their faithful efforts in bearing the "fruit" of righteousness in living the Gospel as they learned it from Epaphras, who Paul calls a "beloved fellow slave" in service to Christ.

So, I'll ask again...For a Christian, what is the pillar and ground of the truth - i.e., the upholder and foundation of the truth? Is it the Bible?


Have a Blessed Day!
 
Upvote 0

JulieB67

Well-Known Member
Apr 21, 2020
1,617
752
56
Ohio US
✟154,014.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
So, if what you say above is true, how would you explain the thousands of different Protestant, non-denominational, Independent churches and sects that have varying beliefs of the truth?
Exactly my point. That's why there are few churches out there that only teach the truth of God's word. Nothing more or less.



The word "Church" means "convocation.
Church is the Greek word ekklesia-a calling out, a popular meeting, especially religious congregation or community of member on earth or saints in heaven or both, assembly
Jesus founded His Church on St. Peter as the “Rock” and head of the Apostles, who would be the pillars of the Church Jesus founded, with Him as the Head and we, as the members of His Body. (Mt. 16: 13-19; Jn 20: 15-19. 1 Cor. 12:27. Col 1:18.)
Our foundation is the prophets/apostles/disciples with Christ being the corner stone.

Acts 2:42 "And they continued steadfastly in the apostles doctrine and followship, and in breaking of bread, and in prayers."

Many physical churches were started by the apostles and that spread. But the church is the many membered body that holds to those same traditions that were brought forth. Again, there was nothing to add. Christ didn't say to add. He states this-

Matthew 28:19 "Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost:"

Matthew 28:20 "Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you: and, lo, I am with you alway, even unto the end of the world." Amen."
Again, if this were true,
How can it not be true when the early churches met where ever. Even in homes. There's nothing stated that it still can't be possible today.
f so, Jesus did say that the Pharisees nullified God’s word for the sake of their tradition, but he did not condemn tradition itself. Indeed,
Again, we are to heed to the traditions they brought forth. We have no need to add to them. Christ foretold the disciples/apostles all things. His ministry is perfect. They later spread that ministry. That's what we hold to even to this day. If you feel the need to add upon what he taught than you are basically stating what Christ taught was lacking. Certainly the disciples/apostles can give advice but that has nothing to do with the actual ministry.

Paul is exhorting the transmission of Sacred Tradition across generations of Christian leaders—from his generation to Timothy’s generation, to the ones that will follow.
Traditions that were brought forth. Nothing new. We didn't need new traditions added to Christ's ministry. Advice is one thing. Turning it into something sacred that has to do with salvation is another.


By who's or what authority did you determine the church you left was teaching "false doctrines"?
Anything that's been added to the bible that wasn't taught by Christ or the disciples/apostles is a false doctrine. The authority given to me is simple -God

Acts 17:11 "These were more noble than those in Thessalonica, in that they received the word with all readiness of mind, and searched the scriptures daily, whether those things were so."


II Timothy 2:15 "Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the world of truth."



Also, how can you be sure the church you presently attend is not teaching false doctrines as well?
Because I study at home -only seeking the truth. I consider myself a Christian, non denominational. I answered these questions because I'm also not a Catholic and used to be considered a protestant.
No matter what church we go to we should all still be studying to show ourselves approve to God. We are to seek out to see if what is being taught to us is truth or not. We can't bring our churches with us on Judgement Day.
So again, I must ask, who is it you believe has the authority to make that determination?
God.

It's fine to assemble together, etc with like minded people. But it would be pretty sad if a mature Christian needs to an actual physical church to tell them what's true or not in the Bible. We can see the truth for ourselves. It's good to have teachers but we absolutely have to back them up. When I saw certain doctrines that were not in the Bible, I no longer associated with that church/denomination.

Let me ask you a question, why does it take so long to become an actual member of the CC (years in some cases) when it's noted in the early days the Lord himself added to the church daily? Thousands were added. That should be the number one red flag that something is wrong. God adds to the church, not man. He's the heart knower and decides.

Acts 2:41 "Then they that gladly received his word were baptized: and the same day there were added unto them about three thousand souls."

Acts 2:47 "Praising God, and having favour with all people. And the Lord added to the church daily such as should be saved."

You keep asking by what authority but it seems that you are putting men's authority over God's. Again, we cannot pull anyone with us on Judgement Day. Would you really put your soul into men's hands over God's?

I'll continue to trust in the Father and his Word.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

jas3

Active Member
Jan 21, 2023
254
148
Southeast
✟27,148.00
Country
United States
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Exactly my point. That's why there are so many churches out there that only teach the truth of God's word. Nothing more or less.
Your point that Fidelibus was responding to was that
there are few and far between churches today that bring forth that truth
So which is it? Are there "so many" or "few and far between"?
Again, we are to heed to the traditions they brought forth. ... We didn't need new traditions added to Christ's ministry.
And given that not all of the traditions taught by the Apostles were written down in the Bible (see e.g. 2 Thess. 2:15), how do you know which traditions are authentic and which ones aren't?
Anything that's been added to the bible that wasn't taught by Christ or the disciples/apostles is a false doctrine. The authority given to me is simple -God
Do all other Christians who read the Bible and come to a different conclusion than you not have God as their authority?
Because I study at home -only seeking the truth.
As do other Christians.
Let me ask you a question, why does it take so long to become an actual member of the CC (years in some cases) when it's noted in the early days the Lord himself added to the church daily? Thousands were added. That should be the number one red flag that something is wrong.
Where does the Bible say that that event is the normative way for people to enter the Church? On the contrary, in Acts 19, Paul finds people who want to be in the Church but have only received the baptism of John and haven't heard of the Holy Spirit. He then instructs them and baptizes them in the baptism of our Lord, which is the same general form of how people join the Catholic or Orthodox church today. Some of the earliest Christian writings we have after the Bible attest to this process too; Justin Martyr writes in the mid-100s that Christians required potential converts to be instructed before they could convert and take communion. Even today, some Protestant churches require potential members to agree to a confession of faith before they can be admitted to membership. So this is not a red flag at all.
 
Upvote 0

JulieB67

Well-Known Member
Apr 21, 2020
1,617
752
56
Ohio US
✟154,014.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
So which is it? Are there "so many" or "few and far between"?
Oops. I mistakenly put many when I meant few. My fingers and my brain do not work together so well at times anymore lol.

how do you know which traditions are authentic and which ones aren't?
Because we have Christ's ministry in the gospels. That is the first foundation and corner stone. And the disciples/apostles brought his ministry forth. I would not think anything spoken would have swayed from what he taught. We do have certain mysteries that Paul taught like "all are changed" at the last trump" but he still is a second witness to Christ's teachings on the subject of his return.

Do all other Christians who read the Bible and come to a different conclusion than you not have God as their authority?
I realize people have different interpretations but I'm talking about subjects that are clearly not in the Bible. If Christ states something I take that as a truth.

As do other Christians.
Good for them.
Where does the Bible say that that event is the normative way for people to enter the Church? On the contrary, in Acts 19, Paul finds people who want to be in the Church but have only received the baptism of John and haven't heard of the Holy Spirit. He then instructs them and baptizes them in the baptism of our Lord,
Yes, but he taught them and immediately baptizes them. They only knew about John and he taught them about Christ.

Acts 19:4 "Then said Paul, "John verily baptized with the baptizm of repentance, saying unto the people, that they should believe on him Which should come after him, that is, on Christ Jesus."

Acts 19:5 "When they heard this, they were baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus


There's no initiation process. God's the heart knower. As I said it's him that adds to the church, not man. That is a truth that's very clearly stated in the Word. People who hear the Word, accept it and receive it can join the church. Those who don't believe after hearing the Word, don't. It's that simple.

There's no long drawn out process. That doesn't even make sense. Today if we hear his voice we can and are told to enter that rest. We aren't even promised tomorrow.


So this is not a red flag at all.
I disagree. There was never any initiation process laid out in the Bible.

Honest repentance takes time but that's between the believer and the Father.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

keepitsimple144

Well-Known Member
Feb 17, 2024
491
72
midwest
✟11,297.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
So, I'll ask again...For a Christian, what is the pillar and ground of the truth - i.e., the upholder and foundation of the truth? Is it the Bible?
I am the way and the truth and the life. John 14:6

And you have an Anointing from the Holy One, so you all know the truth. 1 John 2:20
 
Upvote 0

jas3

Active Member
Jan 21, 2023
254
148
Southeast
✟27,148.00
Country
United States
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Because we have Christ's ministry in the gospels.
No gospel claims to be a complete account of Christ's ministry - in fact, John says twice in his gospel that it is not a complete account.
I realize people have different interpretations but I'm talking about subjects that are clearly not in the Bible. If Christ states something I take that as a truth.
That doesn't really answer the question though - people disagree about what's in the Bible based on their interpretation of certain passages. Maybe this is a more productive question: is your will always aligned with God's? And if not, don't you think you could come to a faulty interpretation of Scripture through personal study alone?
Yes, but he taught them and immediately baptizes them. They only knew about John and he taught them about Christ.
They were already "disciples," so they already knew some of the faith. Paul just completed their instruction.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

JulieB67

Well-Known Member
Apr 21, 2020
1,617
752
56
Ohio US
✟154,014.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
No gospel claims to be a complete account of Christ's ministry - in fact, John says twice in his gospel that it is not a complete account.
John 21:25 "And there are also many other things which Jesus did, the which, if they should be written every one, I suppose that even the world itself could not contain the books that should be written, Amen.

Of course we aren't privy to every spoken word, every miracle, etc of Christ's ministry. It would be impossible to convey everything. But that's not a license to add new traditions that make void the written word. I'm sure they wrote out everything one needs to know. I don't think the gospels are lacking in that regard. Why would John and others leave anything out we needed to know? They wouldn't- they were inspired by God. He was just letting us know there were many more things Christ did. And one thing we know for certain is that Christ was not about traditions of men.

And if not, don't you think you could come to a faulty interpretation of Scripture through personal study alone?
Again, we have to study to show ourselves approved to God. We are to use the scriptures for reproof, etc. It's good to have teachers but we have to back them up. You and I are no different than any other other person that reads the Word.

My Dad and I used to argue over the Word and he would say to me, "Do you think you're smarter than Pastor...? I regret those arguments especially since he's now passed away. But I don't regret standing up for myself, because I would ask him, Dad haven't you read this scripture or that scripture and he would be stumped at times. And once he said, no he hadn't read. The point is he totally trusted his church and what they taught him. A church that would read a few verses surrounded by a personal sermon that had nothing to do with the written Word. These Pastors are also "taught" in these colleges and so on. I remember reading an account of Jim Bakker stating he had never read the bible in it's entirety until he was in prison. Not a fan of Jim Bakker but he spoke a sad reality. And he dropped a major doctrine when he saw that it was not biblical. These pastors are just as unlearned as anybody out there if not more so in some cases. That should be a wake up call for many.


That's why I stated that there are few churches out there that are just about the Word and that's it. That's all I want. If my interpretations are faulty that's between me and God. But I would rather stick it out with the tools (Hebrew and Greek) and at least try. I myself after claiming to be a Christian for most of my life didn't read the bible in it's entirety until I was in my 30's. That's a shame.

On my own, I've found out many things that were never taught to me. One example I learned years ago is that Easter is actually Pascha-passover. Easter is just a bad translation in that one verse. Not to really get off on another topic but that's just one example you'll not learn in many Christian churches.

They were already "disciples,
Once he taught them about Christ, they were immediately baptized. Again, showing there is no initiation process.

Acts 19:3 "And he said unto them, "Unto what then were ye baptized?" And they said, "Unto John's baptism.

Acts 19:4
"Then said Paul, "John verily baptized with the baptizm of repentance, saying unto the people, that they should believe on him Which should come after him, that is, on Christ Jesus.

Acts 19:5 "When they heard this, they were baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus.


From a CC article

What are the steps of Christian Initiation?​

"Prior to beginning the process of becoming a Christian, an individual comes to some knowledge of Jesus Christ, considers his or her relationship with Jesus Christ and is usually attracted in some way to the Catholic Church. This period is known as the Period of Evangelization and Precatechumenate. For some, this process involves a long period of searching; for others, a shorter time. Often, contact with people of faith and a personal faith experience lead people to inquire about the Catholic Church. After a conversation with a priest or a parish director of Christian Initiation, the person, known as an "inquirer," may seek acceptance into the Order of Catechumens, through the Rite of Acceptance. During this Rite, the inquirer stands amidst the parish community and states that he or she wants to become a baptized member of the Catholic Church. The parish assembly affirms this desire and the inquirer becomes a Catechumen."

The Period of the Catechumenate can last for as long as several years......

Compared to this-

Acts 2:38 "Then Peter said unto them, "Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost."

Acts 2:39 "For the promise is unto you, and to your children, and to all that are afar off, even as many a the Lord our God shall call.

Acts 2:41 "Then they that gladly received his word were baptized: and the same day there were added unto them about three thousand souls."


And this-


Acts 2:47 "Praising God, and having favour with all people. And the Lord added to the church daily such as should be saved."



You don't see a red flag, but I certainly do. This is from Peter, supposedly (according to them) the CC's first pope. But if they really believed in Peter's words they would see that there is no long drawn out process. You either receive the word or you don't. And again it's the Lord that adds to the church, not man.

Many churches today (all denominations) are about control and I'd rather not give them that control. And I know this thread is about promoting the CC once again but I'm not buying it. Others can if they want. But in the end, we all have to sail our own ships....

ETA I will state repentance can take time (especially with certain sins) but God is the heart knower. He knows who's sincere and receives the Word and takes it to heart. But there is still no initiation process. Once repentance (change of heart) takes place, you're in. It doesn't matter what a physical church says.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: WilliamC
Upvote 0