SC Senate Passes Bill Banning Affirmative Care For Minors

rjs330

Well-Known Member
CF Ambassadors
May 22, 2015
22,861
6,195
64
✟341,698.00
Faith
Pentecostal
For me, it's not as much about agreeing or disagreeing with a particular political; party, it's more about obtaining the proper healthcare.
Me neither, more things we have in common. I don't care if it's the Republicans, Democrats, the Green Party or Grandma's Party. All I care about in relation to this thread is that kids are not transitioned and that Affirmative Therapy and drugs are banned from kids. I don't care who does it. A child does not have the wisdom, capacity, understanding or brain function to make those kinds of decisions with or without parental consent. And as we saw in the WPATH files the parents had no clue either.
think transgender people want to feel like they are "normal" and they are normal in that the value of their lives is no less than anybody else. All we really have to go on is what the patient says and does related to coping with the way they feel. What I am talking about is how to get gender dysphoria treated under the already established guidelines AND have insurance pay for it. People still have the option of hiring a plastic surgeon for elective surgery. I honestly don't know how or who prescribes hormones leading up to and after going under the knife but if you have enough cash, I'm pretty sure they can purchase the treatment of their choice.
Of course they want to feel.normal. or at least some do. I think there's a lot of sexual fetishism involved as well. But for those who honestly think they should be the opposite sex, I'm sure they do want to feel.normal. Just like ANYONE with a mental health issue. People with anxiety, depression, or are bi-polar want to feel normal. But they also realize they are not. They would live not to have those issues. Transgender people are not normal either. They have an illness. And just like rhe rest of the people.with mental health issues it's not up to us to alter society to make them.feel normal. There's nothing I can do to not make a person who.is bi-polar feel normal. I shouldn't be participating in their mental health problem. Same goes for the anorexic. Or the paranoid schizophrenic.

The established guidelines are bunk. A d yes if you have enough cash you can purchase just about anything. What kids need is therapy. Not Affirmative Therapy no matter who.pays for it. Not for children. Now if an insurance company wants to cover someone's transformation, then who.am I to stop them. They are a private entity. They can pay for whatever they want. But it should be outlawed for kids.
 
Upvote 0

Ana the Ist

Aggressively serene!
Feb 21, 2012
37,776
11,510
✟441,389.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Because it is if you want your insurance to pay for it.

According to Obamacare...Trans medicine is covered.


Medicaid covers it unless it's explicitly stated in some policy or law that it isn't.


It's very easy to look up.

No....it's not a mental disorder if insurance has to pay for it.

Except the DSM-5 which clearly states the criteria and the Psychiatric community that accepts these standards across the USA.exepts

Go ahead and quote "transgender" in the DSM-5.

It's not even in there.




"Transgender" isn't a disorder, it's a label for a person who suffers from gender dysphoria.

No....it's not, and that's not how the DSM-5 describes gender dysphoria.
 
Upvote 0

rturner76

Domine non-sum dignus
Site Supporter
May 10, 2011
10,703
3,648
Twin Cities
✟741,230.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Green
What kids need is therapy. Not Affirmative Therapy no matter who.pays for it.
I was totally with you until here. From the small amount of research I have done about the goals of affirmative action, they are focused on treating gender dysphoria specifically by assuming that their thoughts and feelings are valid as opposed to putting them in a treatment that teaches them to deny or ignore those thoughts and feelings by convincing people that they don't actually feel what they feel but they have either been influenced by the devil, the need to keep a stiff upper lip and use willpower to convince themselves that they don't feel what they feel.

They have found that treatment that acknowledges their thoughts and feelings are more effective in the treatment of gender dysphoria. During this process, those thoughts and feelings can be examined to determine the best treatment options, There are extremists in every "school of thought" but IMO Affirmative Action seems to be the best route considering they will then be working on thoughts, feelings, and actions rather than the best way to deny those thoughts and feelings or teach them to feel shame for their thoughts. That method has had many more negative outcomes. We all know that when we deny our feelings, they grow stronger over time, and the denial/shame increases. Dealing openly and honestly with people's thoughts and feelings I believe will obtain the most favorable outcomes. By examining a patients feelings they can explore things like what is motivating this desire of change. If it's something as simple as they like women's fashion and they way they are treated in society, it may be possible for them to do the minimum like go out on weekends as a woman.

Having said all of that, I am not a trained counselor in this field so I don't know what the criteria is to get medication. It may only be allowed in the most severe cases. AA I don't believe encourages medical professionals to push through medication or surgery until it is determined that it is the best option for the patients sanity. I don't know what the standards are but if they want insurance to pay for it, they will have to dig deep in therapy until the Dr. feels it is the best or only option left. It's not equal to Drs' being given licence to prescribe meds and refer people to surgery.
They are a private entity. They can pay for whatever they want. But it should be outlawed for kids.
Treatment should be outlawed for kids or just prescriptions and/or surgery?
 
  • Winner
Reactions: BCP1928
Upvote 0

rturner76

Domine non-sum dignus
Site Supporter
May 10, 2011
10,703
3,648
Twin Cities
✟741,230.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Green
According to Obamacare...Trans medicine is covered.
I never said it wasn't. They cover the treatment of gender dysphoria. You still can't walk into a surgery with Obamacare and get a gender-altering surgery. You have to go through all of the steps which include a doctors recommendation or referral. Even for physical injuries, unless you go to the E/R, your doctor must refer you to an orthopedic doctor or a knee doctor or whatever. You are evaluated there and they begin treatment. That may include physical therapy and medication or it might include surgery them physical therapy. It depends on the treatment plan. Either way if the specialist is not a surgeon, they will refer you to a surgeon. Same with mental health. Have an intake, do an evaluation, have a doctor and or therapist recommended, put together a treatment plan.
It's very easy to look up.

No....it's not a mental disorder if insurance has to pay for it.
Why would medical insurance pay for something that wasn't related to medical care? I think that's the third time I've asked that question.
Go ahead and quote "transgender" in the DSM-5.

It's not even in there.
It's not listed as a transgender disorder. Transgender is a noun that indicated that the person has changed gender. You need to look for "gender dysphoria" as I keep telling you. That is the illness. Changing gender (becoming a transgender person) is one of many ways to treat gender dysphoria.

This usually doesn't happen with you but I think you may be letting your personal morals dictate to you what is and is not a fact.
No....it's not, and that's not how the DSM-5 describes gender dysphoria.
So what are you confused about? I have already stated numerous times that gender dysphoria is the disorder. Gender reassignment surgery is one treatment for gender dysphoria. Of course, you can't find "transgender" in the DSM-5. Because like I have said numerous times, transgender is not the illness, gender dysphoria is.

I'm sure you are capable of learning new information. Do you wish to apply it or ignore it and consider your opinion fact?
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Paulos23
Upvote 0

rjs330

Well-Known Member
CF Ambassadors
May 22, 2015
22,861
6,195
64
✟341,698.00
Faith
Pentecostal
was totally with you until here. From the small amount of research I have done about the goals of affirmative action, they are focused on treating gender dysphoria specifically by assuming that their thoughts and feelings are valid
That's not therapy. And that hasn't been proven to be effective. In Fact its dangerous because kids are put on drugs and the trabs train even if they aren't trans.
them to deny or ignore those thoughts and feelings by convincing people that they don't actually feel what they feel but they have either been influenced by the devil, the need to keep a stiff upper lip and use willpower to convince themselves that they don't feel what they feel
That's not therapy either. Genspect has the therapy for this and neither the devil nor a stiff upper lip nor tge willpower to convince themselves is part of therapy. I honestly don't get where you are coming from. I don't think your statements has ever been suggested.
They have found that treatment that acknowledges their thoughts and feelings are more effective in the treatment of gender dysphoria.
No they haven't. That's exactly why Europe stopped.
IMO Affirmative Action seems to be the best route considering they will then be working on thoughts, feelings, and actions
It hasn't been shown to be effective. That's why Europe stopped doing it.
rather than the best way to deny those thoughts and feelings or teach them to feel shame for their thoughts. That method has had many more negative outcomes.
Literally no therapist is suggesting any such thing.
it's something as simple as they like women's fashion and they way they are treated in society, it may be possible for them to do the minimum like go out on weekends as a woman.
If they want to do that no one is trying to stop them.
may only be allowed in the most severe cases.
We've already showed this is NOT the way it's being done.
don't know what the standards are but if they want insurance to pay for it, they will have to dig deep in therapy until the Dr. feels it is the best or only option left. It's not equal to Drs' being given licence to prescribe meds and refer people to surgery.
I do know what tge standards are. They don't require therapy. For kids it's a very fast process. Damaging blockers, then shortly after hormone therapy with no in depth deep therapy required. We've said UT a million times. How many more times do we need to say?
Treatment should be outlawed for kids or just prescriptions and/or surgery?
Affirmative therapy, drugs and surgeries should be outlawed. Therapy as recommended by Genspect with is a therapy model should be the accepted methodology for kids. And to ease the leftist mind, Christians had nothing to do with it. No religion involved. Just therapists do therapy.

Now if the US would do a systematic review and then open a gender research lab like Europe did and stop Afirmative Care that would be good.
 
Upvote 0

rturner76

Domine non-sum dignus
Site Supporter
May 10, 2011
10,703
3,648
Twin Cities
✟741,230.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Green
That's not therapy. And that hasn't been proven to be effective. In Fact its dangerous because kids are put on drugs and the trabs train even if they aren't trans.
Pray tell, what has been proven to be effective?
That's not therapy either. Genspect has the therapy for this and neither the devil nor a stiff upper lip nor tge willpower to convince themselves is part of therapy. I honestly don't get where you are coming from. I don't think your statements has ever been suggested.
Where I'm coming from is the methods I mentioned are the alternative to Affirmative therapy.

It hasn't been shown to be effective. That's why Europe stopped doing it
So I ask again, what is effective?
Literally no therapist is suggesting any such thing.
That's right but lay people by denying that gender dysphoria is a thing support those methods. A therapist will provide therapy and AFFIRM that what they are feeling is real to them wouldn't you agree?
If they want to do that no one is trying to stop them.
I didn't say they were, my point was through therapy and assessment protocol, it can be determined whet the best method of treatment may be.
We've already showed this is NOT the way it's being done.
I would like to learn more about that. Do you have any links to a medical program that can confirm this? It;'s not that I don't believe you, I just would be more convinced if I knew what information you were looking at.
I do know what tge standards are. They don't require therapy. For kids it's a very fast process. Damaging blockers, then shortly after hormone therapy with no in depth deep therapy required. We've said UT a million times. How many more times do we need to say?
I am not familiar with tge or UT. Will you say more about them?
Affirmative therapy, drugs and surgeries should be outlawed.
I don't think I would call them Affirmative Action drugs. I do think it's a method of treatment that AFFIRMS what the patient feels is real to them. It's not up to AA to dispense drugs, it is up to an individual doctor.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

rjs330

Well-Known Member
CF Ambassadors
May 22, 2015
22,861
6,195
64
✟341,698.00
Faith
Pentecostal
Pray tell, what has been proven to be effective?
Therapy.
Where I'm coming from is the methods I mentioned are the alternative to Affirmative therapy.
So is shooting yourself in the foot. But is not really a viable alternative. And I don't think anyone except leftists have even mentioned those alternatives. It seems to me that the left thinks that's all there is. For some reason they there is the thought process that Affirmative Therapy is all there is so we need to keep doing it even if there is no evidence it actually works. In fact it has some serious affects upon kids. It's not different than if a kid is in pain and you give them aspirin and we discover there is no evidence that aspirin works. In fact it has some serious side effects. But those on the left mantra would be, well that's all we got so give it to them anyway.
That's right but lay people by denying that gender dysphoria is a thing support those methods.
Where?
A therapist will provide therapy and AFFIRM that what they are feeling is real to them wouldn't you agree?
Would they? I think a real therapist would say something along the lines of "I understand you are feeling that way." Let's explore that some more. "

Affirmative Therapy does not just affirm the feelings, but it affirms that the person IS trans. If you say you are rrans, then you are trans. There is NO exploration the fact that the child may not be trans at all.
didn't say they were, my point was through therapy and assessment protocol, it can be determined whet the best method of treatment may be.
And who has established this assessment protocol thats being used in the US? WPATH.
am not familiar with tge or UT. Will you say more about them?
Sorry typos.
would like to learn more about that. Do you have any links to a medical program that can confirm this? It;'s not that I don't believe you, I just would be more convinced if I knew what information you were looking at.
If you would like to learn the best way to don't is look it up yourself. I've backed up everything I've said and there is no reason for you to question the veracity of of the claim. So has Ana. What I've found is that whenever I post something like that I hear the claim from those on the left if 'well, you expect us to consider it a problem. It's only one incident you posted.' My answer always has been how many do you need? I never get a response back. I have the sneaking suspicion that you may make the same statement. Would you, ot would you agree that if I posted something you wouldn't just try and brush it off with as only evidence of one incident?
 
Upvote 0