Appreciate your request, TheyCallMeDave. Sorry it took so long for me to get back. Don't know my way around yet. In posing the question, I realize the issue is very complicated. So I thought I'd share some of this complexity with you. You speak about addressing opponents to the biblical model of God. Fine> However, I think you should carefully bear in mind that you are actually debating the classical Christian model of God, classical theism, the god of the creeds and confessions. Fact is, the model or picture of God comes largely from certain schools of Hellenic philosophy, not Scripture. That's a point many Christians miss and that I cannot stress enough. In brief, classical theism argued God is void of body, parts, passions, even compassion, wholly immutable, the supreme cause, never the effect, without even the shadow of movement, wholly unaffected by the world. This does conflict with the biblical model. Now, please bear in mind that the Bible is not a book of metaphysics, tells us very little about how God is build. However, it presents enough of a picture of God to stand in tension with classical theism. The biblical God does in fact change. Over 100 passages speak of God as changing his mine, etc., See, for example, Gen. 6:6, Hosea 8:11. The biblical God is viewed in highly anthropomorphic terms. Hence, just about every body part is attributed to him. In addition, the biblical God is not indifferent but filled with great emotion. There are implications that the biblical God is ontologically one with the universe. See, for example, Jer. 28:28, II Cor. 15:21. There is implication that God needs the universe. All the biblical predication is relative predication. It's hard to be a father without children, a creator without as creation, etc. However, these are only implications, as the Bible is not a book in metaphysics. In recent years, major theologians have challenged the classical model on the basis that it is not biblical and also on the basis that it does not make sense to begin with. I share that approach and am happy to discuss it with you.