Moon light - the word of God vs falsely so called science

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

Just not your satisfaction, right?

Nor to any satisfaction, really.

Whose money do you spend, when you go to the store?

Yours, or your employer's?

Technically, it's the Bank of England's and it's just very small or very long term loans without interest.

 

[AV1611VET]

Technically, it's the Bank of England's and it's just very small or very long term loans without interest.

That'll make sure you don't understand what I'm saying, won't it?

I can usually tell when I make a good point.

People will be willing to make themselves look ... well ... clownish in their avoidance of an honest answer.

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

That'll make sure you don't understand what I'm saying, won't it?

I can usually tell when I make a good point.

People will be willing to make themselves look ... well ... clownish in their avoidance of an honest answer.

Or sometimes your own statements are nonsensical that all they deserve is a nonsensical statement in return.

How can the moon have 'propriety light' when it's a ball of rock? Why not just say "It's reflected light from the sun"?

 

[AV1611VET]

Or sometimes your own statements are nonsensical that all they deserve is a nonsensical statement in return.

How can the moon have 'propriety light' when it's a ball of rock? Why not just say "It's reflected light from the sun"?

Like I did in Post 854?

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

Like I did in Post 854?

But why call it 'proprietary light'? The moon is an object, not a being or a company or an entity. It cannot own or lend light.

 

[AV1611VET]

But why call it 'proprietary light'?

Would calling it what the Bible calls it ("its own light") be better for you?

The moon is an object, not a being or a company or an entity.

Okay.

It cannot own or lend light.

It's a legal distinction.

Not a physical one.

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

Would calling it what the Bible calls it ("its own light") be better for you?

If you included an explanation that wasn't just "reflected light from the sun", then that would be more honest, since in saying that moon gives off its own light, you're saying that the moon gives off its own light.

It's a legal distinction.

Not a physical one.

And why did you feel the need to give a legal distinction at all? Are you afraid that you're going to be sued by the sun for saying that the moon reflects its light?

 

[AV1611VET]

And why did you feel the need to give a legal distinction at all?

Well ... you know ... someone might get the wrong idea and think the Bible has mistakes in It.

 

[BCP1928]

Well ... you know ... someone might get the wrong idea and think the Bible has mistakes in It.

Not likely, since the Bible does not address the question of whether the moon's light is reflected or originated by the moon.

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

Well ... you know ... someone might get the wrong idea and think the Bible has mistakes in It.

It unfortunately does. There is not one thing written by human hand that does not have mistakes in it.

 

[AV1611VET]

It unfortunately does. There is not one thing written by human hand that does not have mistakes in it.

I take it then that the Ten Commandments are perfect?

Exodus 24:12 And the LORD said unto Moses, Come up to me into the mount, and be there: and I will give thee tables of stone, and a law, and commandments which I have written; that thou mayest teach them.

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

I take it then that the Ten Commandments are perfect?

Exodus 24:12 And the LORD said unto Moses, Come up to me into the mount, and be there: and I will give thee tables of stone, and a law, and commandments which I have written; that thou mayest teach them.

AV, I'm not going to be drawn into a debate on the inerrancy and perfection of the Bible with you.

Just try and make the attempt to explain how the moon can produce its own light without reflecting it from the sun.

 

[AV1611VET]

Just try and make the attempt to explain how the moon can produce its own light without reflecting it from the sun.

Sure.

When you tell me how the moon can have its own light without producing any.

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

Sure.

When you tell me how the moon can have its own light without producing any.

Its surface allows the moon to reflect the light from the sun.

Your turn to answer my question, if you can.

 

[d taylor]

And it's funny that 'the age we are in' has been applied consistently to the entire length and existence of humanity since the Bible was written.

And in that whole time, not one person has described how the moon gives off it's own light.

The age started in the garden when sin was brought in. Why do you think God selected a people for Himself, they were supposed to be a light to satan's kingdom. So people could come to believe in the true creator God and not some god satan helped to by deception convinced was real.

I have stated several times (and even posted photos) the light from the moon originates from inside the moon. the surface and the impressions on the moon emit light.

Take sphere and light it with a light source and recreate with a camera. The same type of way light does when a camera is zoomed in on the moon. You should be able to reproduce this, that is if the moons light is a reflected light.

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

The age started in the garden when sin was brought in. Why do you think God selected a people for Himself, they were supposed to be a light to satan's kingdom. So people could come to believe in the true creator God and not some god satan helped to by deception convinced was real.

I have stated several times (and even posted photos) the light from the moon originates from inside the moon. the surface and the impressions on the moon emit light.

Take sphere and light it with a light source and recreate with a camera. The same type of way light does when a camera is zoomed in on the moon. You should be able to reproduce this, that is if the moons light is a reflected light.

But all the evidence shows that the moon's light is only reflected light. There is no mechanism for the moon to create light of its own.

 

[d taylor]

But all the evidence shows that the moon's light is only reflected light. There is no mechanism for the moon to create light of its own.

-​

Why can i reproduce the exact same light effect that is in the video of the moon. When i cover a incandescent light with paper and zoom in on the paper covered light.

 

[dlamberth]

It's a legal distinction.

Not a physical one.

I'd say it's a poetic distinction.

 

[AV1611VET]

I'd say it's a poetic distinction.

Poetry in motion?

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

-​

Why can i reproduce the exact same light effect that is in the video of the moon. When i cover a incandescent light with paper and zoom in on the paper covered light.

Nope, that's just a nonsensical comment if I ever saw one.

If you say that the moon creates and emits its own light, then there must be a mechanism that exists in the moon to create said light. In the sun, that mechanism if fusion. In saying that moon is its own source of light, then something similar must be happening to create said light. What is that mechanism, that process?