- Mar 4, 2005
- 28,185
- 8,115
- Country
- United Kingdom
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Married
I'm sure you do.I try.
You need to love yourself first, though. God does; he says that you're worth dying for, and he wants you to be his child.
Upvote
0
I'm sure you do.I try.
I cut and pasted a scripture from the Bible. You can do whatever you want with the Bible.You seem to take Ecclesiastes out of context.
Pray for me. I see ugly things.I'm sure you do.
You need to love yourself first, though. God does; he says that you're worth dying for, and he wants you to be his child.
Paul died daily so there is that.I cut and pasted a scripture from the Bible. You can do whatever you want with the Bible.
2 corinthians 3:6 "the letter kills, but the Spirit gives life."
He debated, explained and defended his new faith to those who didn't believe - exactly what we should be doing.Paul didn't debate like we do.
What's that got to do with it? Paul was a Pharisee, well versed in Jewish traditions and in the Scriptures. After he met Jesus, he debated with people why Jesus was the Messiah.Please don't compare the debate we see here with Paul's ministry. He wasn't catholic or protestant.
i) we don't know that he dressed in rags.You ask what I meant. I mean that people today would likely reject Paul because he dresses in rags and talks about being tormented by demons. They did in 1 Corinthians chapter 4.
No; lots of things.More debate likely
Obviously not literally.Paul died daily
How do you define "people's traditions"?I don't care my friend. I don't need peoples traditions
And if everyone was poor, who would there be to help us out of it, provide for us, help us care for our families and so on?Money and education is actually the opposite of faith according to Paul. Not that education is evil but it needs to be humble while the lack of education needs to be exalted. Its the same with poverty and wealth. Poverty should be exalted not wealth.
So Paul is a crazy hypocrite who says not to debate but then he does the opposite and debates people. Something is not right with that theoryHe debated, explained and defended his new faith to those who didn't believe - exactly what we should be doing.
What's that got to do with it? Paul was a Pharisee, well versed in Jewish traditions and in the Scriptures. After he met Jesus, he debated with people why Jesus was the Messiah.
I didn't say anything about Catholics or protestants - they're not the only ones who can debate.
i) we don't know that he dressed in rags.
ii) People rejected Paul because he, an eminent Jew who persecuted those who believed in the Messiah, started arguing with Jews that Jesus was the Messiah.
iii) The Corinthian church were being affected/influenced by Gnosticism. Gnostics believed that those who had special, or inside, knowledge were God's favoured ones. They were mocking Paul - as others did - because a) Paul had not been one of the 12 disciples and b) because they, the Corinthians, believed they were superior to Paul, had greater knowledge, more wealth and so on. Read Chapter 1:18-25. He said that God chose the foolish to shame the wise, the weak to shame the strong and the despised things to nullify those that are not. In chapter 4 Paul talks of all the ways in which they are weak and foolish, compared with the Corinthians' so called strength, to challenge that attitude and the false teaching they have received - i.e. that knowledge, strength and power are good.
Its about equality as in 2 Corinthians 8. If people cant deal with that love then they should as least not justify greed and erring from the faith by desiring and obtaining wealth for ones self. Paul doesn't teach that but the oppositeAnd if everyone was poor, who would there be to help us out of it, provide for us, help us care for our families and so on?
He didn't say we shouldn't debate.So Paul is a crazy hypocrite who says not to debate but then he does the opposite and debates people. Something is not right with that theory
Is it in scripture or at least not against scripture and doesn't hinder unity as one mind and voice? If not then it's useless to me.How do you define "people's traditions"?
Yes he did. Why would Jesus debate against his own mind? Christ isn't dividedHe didn't say we shouldn't debate.
I don't even know where I begin or i end anymore. I hate this body. It causes nothing but grief.
Or people need to experience the terror that I do and see how strong they are. I appreciate the words but they won't change anythingYou seem to have some very serious issues of self assurance and self confidence.
You have to have some backbone, that comes from confconfidence.
Or people need to experience the terror that I do and see how strong they are. I appreciate the words but they won't change anything
I'm not sure it's the same thing at all. 1 Corinthians 4 comes to mind. You're strong but im weak. You're wise but I'm a fool. You're honored and I'm despised.I've experienced great terror myself, and I factually know I am not strong, though I have yet to bend when the heat is up...
Confidence is necessary.
0
I'm not sure it's the same thing at all. 1 Corinthians 4 comes to mind. You're strong but im weak. You're wise but I'm a fool. You're honored and I'm despised.
Never said that he was. ??Yes he did. Why would Jesus debate against his own mind? Christ isn't divided