We will have to agree to disagree on several points.Who does? to the contrary, despite some rhetoric, most countries, including Germany, hesitate to answer to the Russian aggression according to international law, give rather symbolic military help to the Ukraine (but rather money).
You do not even mention that Russia started a full-fledged war, after years of de-facto war against Ukraine with some fascist proxies in Eastern Ukraine.
The real warhawk is Putin.
The war in Ukraine has been going on since 2014 where the Obama Admin planned the Maidan coup in Kiev in Feb 2014, they replaced the governmentWho does? to the contrary, despite some rhetoric, most countries, including Germany, hesitate to answer to the Russian aggression according to international law, give rather symbolic military help to the Ukraine (but rather money).
You do not even mention that Russia started a full-fledged war, after years of de-facto war against Ukraine with some fascist proxies in Eastern Ukraine.
The real warhawk is Putin.
The crisis in Ukraine has certainly sent numerous shock waves throughout the world, impacting not only Ukraine itself but also the global community. If the US had not pushed for the revolution in Ukraine, we most likely would have seen the Ukrainians themselves deciding if they wanted to move into the EU’s sphere of influence.The war in Ukraine has been going on since 2014 where the Obama Admin planned the Maidan coup in Kiev in Feb 2014, they replaced the government
The USA would be the sponsor of this war, and they're the Warhawks for the military complex $$$
It's extremely unlikely that any of the countries which posses nuclear weapons will ever get involved in a large scale nuclear war. As this would mean complete antihalation for them as well as the enemy. I don't think any of the leaders are willing to commit a murder suicide, nobody would allow psychopaths like that to lead their country.How would a nuclear war between Russia and the US affect you?
Simulation and Explanation Youtube 4:08
That was a very good post, though the video related more to long-range ballistic weapons than to low-yield nuclear weapons.It's extremely unlikely that any of the countries which posses nuclear weapons will ever get involved in a large scale nuclear war. As this would mean complete antihalation for them as well as the enemy. I don't think any of the leaders are willing to commit a murder suicide, nobody would allow psychopaths like that to lead their country.
So we can rest assured that won't happen, however there is a real risk that Russia will use tactical nuclear weapons. These are much smaller nuclear weapons which can be used in localized battles, so they don't cause widespread destruction. they can takeout towns and small cities.
I saw a documentary about 8 years ago, which revealed the number of nuclear submarines roaming the deep in the oceans. I don't remember the exact combined number but they said that the combined submarines had enough nuclear weapons on them to destroy the entire population of the earth 10 times over.That was a very good post, though the video related more to long-range ballistic weapons than to low-yield nuclear weapons.
Over the past five years, the Russians have developed and released some impressive and terrifying nuclear weapons, where their low-yield weapons can easily be used against armies, naval task forces and air bases.
As onl Russia and possibly China currently have hypersonic glide-vehicles, which are used to transport both nuclear and non-nuclear weapons, as the US could be maybe a decade away from developing their own systems, this means that if Russia decided that the US and NATO have gone too far with their support of Ukraine, that Russia could very easily take out say a US carrier battle group that is located far enough away from Europe which would of course reduce any risk of nuclear fallout.
As such a stealth attack using a Poseidon nuclear torpedo would provide no prior warning, would the US be prepared to launch an all-out Ballistic assault, or would they try and publicly play down such an event as being a tragic accident?
This law consists of international treatues, e.e. the UN charter.Your use of “international law” is a term that I always find interesting in that I have never come across such law.
Oh, you forgot the United kingdom. It took the felt welfare of the British people above the internationalism of the EU, and the result show that the real way to maintain this welfare is the »internationalist« agenda.it seems that only the governments of Hungary, Serbia and now Slovakia are prepared to place the welfare of their people above that of the demands of the globalists.
Thats not that clear as you suggest.With your reference to “Russia starting a full-fledged war”, as to the conflict itself, this was the outcome of US/NATO interference
A government that out of a sudden refused to sign an agreement that had been negotiated and agreed upon, all evidence shows this was because of massive Russian pressure, and the »rebels« protested against such pressure., where the US in particular encouraged the rebels to overthrow the democratically elected government
This is a lie., for one that was being controlled essentially by fascists.
Just annex what you have conquered, so the army of the country you stole this land from can be called »thugs« - do you really believe that?I should also point out that there are no Russian troops in Ukraine as Russia is merely pushing out Zelensky's thugs from within what is now Russian territory.
He did that by supporting the Donbass Fascists, even gave them rockets, one destroyed a civil Malaysian aircraft … such things made people believe he was not peaceful - Putin thus had the same fate as Hitler …As for Putin, he appears to be the main peace-maker, in that for seven years he attempted to have the Donbass Republics re-unite with Ukraine
No. Eastern Europe was afraid of Russia, therefore they all wanted to join NATO (and as a result of the attack against the Ukraine, even Finland and Sweden, which for a long time were proud of their neutrality, entered NATO). Western Europe was not afraid - definitely not the German government, which clung to bnorthstream-2 until the very start of the war.But of course, I am well aware that most of Europe has always been afraid of Russia
Lithuania, Poland, and France all have troops in limited numbers in Ukraine, its present news that Putin has declared this as a threat to Russia, and I agree it might be very close to tactical nuclear weapons directly related to these NATO countriesIt's extremely unlikely that any of the countries which posses nuclear weapons will ever get involved in a large scale nuclear war. As this would mean complete antihalation for them as well as the enemy. I don't think any of the leaders are willing to commit a murder suicide, nobody would allow psychopaths like that to lead their country.
So we can rest assured that won't happen, however there is a real risk that Russia will use tactical nuclear weapons. These are much smaller nuclear weapons which can be used in localized battles, so they don't cause widespread destruction. they can takeout towns and small cities.
Any evidence it was planned, and not a spontaneous reaction to the political turnaround of the government?
I knew there were Private Mercenary Soldiers, in the Ukraine but I didn't know that National Troops from those countries are directly involved in combat roles. That's very bad news, as it could be seen as a provocation by the Russians, who have resisted the temptation to go all out thus far.Lithuania, Poland, and France all have troops in limited numbers in Ukraine, its present news that Putin has declared this as a threat to Russia, and I agree it might be very close to tactical nuclear weapons directly related to these NATO countries
Fact is Russia is fighting the western world in a proxy war, the UK supplied the missiles that have attacked Russia, UK Prime Minister "Cameron" recently has openly stated Ukraine can use its missiles to attack Russia, that's a declaration of war in my opinion?I knew there were Private Mercenary Soldiers, in the Ukraine but I didn't know that National Troops from those countries are directly involved in combat roles. That's very bad news, as it could be seen as a provocation by the Russians, who have resisted the temptation to go all out thus far.
Everyone is hoping for a de-escalation and some kind of diplomatic solution but it looks like we're heading towards the worst case scenario.
I remember Putin saying that it was going to be a short military operation, where the Russians would achieve their goal in a few weeks. What we have now is the opposite, as the conflict is spirals towards an all out war between Russia, the US and NATO.
If this war does escalate into a Russia US and NATO war, it will be a catastrophic war, even they don't use any tactical nuclear weapons. They have enough conventional weapons between them, to wipe out millions.
It looks like, neither Russia or Ukraine are willing to give an inch of disputed territory. This conflict wouldn't have come about, if the terms and conditions for Ukrainian independence were settled when the USSR collapsed. I'm not sure what they agreed on back then, but it sounds like they left a lot of unresolved issues which have come back to bite them.
The entire western world is fighting a proxy war against Russia. We could also say that every tax payer in the western world is fighting a proxy war against Russia, whether they like it or not. As a tax payer, I don't get a say in what my government does with the money. The truth is, I don't even know why this war was started.Fact is Russia is fighting the western world in a proxy war, the UK supplied the missiles that have attacked Russia, UK Prime Minister "Cameron" recently has openly stated Ukraine can use its missiles to attack Russia, that's a declaration of war in my opinion?
I have a somewhat different list:Lithuania, Poland, and France all have troops in limited numbers in Ukraine
Did he want to say the the Russian army could be defeated by 100 man, or was this propaganda?its present news that Putin has declared this as a threat to Russia
No, I think this is propaganda.and I agree it might be very close to tactical nuclear weapons directly related to these NATO countries