There are many ways to be overfed. The anti-Christian left takes great pride in supporting homosexals. Even going so far as to support their move into Christian Churches. Talk about hypocrites.
Wow, talk about moving the goalposts. You tried using Ezekiel's claim that Sodom was overfed and unconcerned with the poor and I show where you were scapegoating gays while ignoring the fact that it is a problem in American in general. Rather than rebutting my statements, showing me that I'm wrong in my claims, instead you use it to bash other Christians that don't believe the same things you do and try to twist Ezekiel's clear meaning about being "overfed".
It is a claim with support. Spin all you want to. You just don't see GLBT's pushing for Evangelicals to lead the way.
Yes, just like I don't see Jews pushing for Evangelicals to lead the way, or how I don't see Blacks pushing for Neo-Nazis to lead the way. So, where is the support for your claims?
have you ever read the New testament?
Yes, I have.
Have you ever sperated wheat from the chaff? Lot's of chaff and only a tiny handful of seeds.
In fact, he clearly instructs in
these parables that it is not your job to separate the wheat from the tares, your job is merely to sow the seed and to love your neighbor.
I can smell the BS through my computer screen. You live in la-la land pal.
Bzzzzzz. Wrong answer. Wanna try again?
[sarcasm]I'm overwhelmed by your evidence.[/sarcasm] If you wish to provide evidence that gays donate less than others to the poor, I'd be happy to examine it. In the meantime, your petty insults only reinforce that you cannot support your claims.
A cat can bark, but it doesn't make a cat a dog. Conservative homosexuals would be the ones using condoms.
False. Seriously, there are some people on these boards that, while they support homosexual rights, are quite conservative according how most conservatives in the US attempt to define it -- that government should be limited and small. Again, I gave you an example of conservative gays and all I get out of you is a lame putdown -- again, a sign in debates that you can't argue the facts so you attempt to ridicule those who do post facts.
Seeing how badly GLBT's want to mimick Christians of late, I'll bet the numbers are up. But, I'll also bet that they probaly give to gay causes.
You do realize, of course, that probably around 90% of all homosexuals today were raised in a home that was at least nominally Christian. Beyond that, gays tend to know what it is like to be discriminated against and persecuted. Many of them were kicked out of "good" Christian homes (by your definition of good Christian) for being gay. As such, the gays I know are more likely to be empathetic to the poor and downtrodden.
As for giving to gay organizations, why shouldn't they? I'm guessing you have donated money to an anti-gay organization, perhaps even MassResistance (seeing as how often you have attempted to use their propoganda). So what is the difference?
Exactly. Jews acting like Sodomites. Believers are not to do as Sodomites do.
Which goes back to what Ezekiel called the sins of Sodom:
Ezekiel 16:49-50 said:
Now this was the sin of your sister Sodom: She and her daughters were arrogant, overfed and unconcerned; they did not help the poor and needy. 50 They were haughty and did detestable things before me. Therefore I did away with them as you have seen.
So is is not "exactly", behaving like a harlot is not what the sin of Sodom was.
I don't ignore that for an instance. AND, like gay sex, Christians should not engage in porn either. UNLESSSSS of course they were born with a porn orientation. I'm sure that is coming next.
Yet you tried claiming it was gays and the evil of porn, completely ignoring the majority of porn is heterosexual. In fact, what even tapes of lesbian sex are aimed at heterosexuals rather than lesbians. As such, you can't single out gay porn and claim it proves they are like Sodom, it merely reinforces they way you are picking and choosing to support a presupposition.
Hmm, care to do a study of size and frequecy? Say, San Francisco versus TEXAS for example? You know, in Florida, there are porn shops next to Pawn Shops next to Mega Churches.
Yes, and not far from where I live there is an adult toy/video shop right next to a family ice skating rink and a large family entertainment center, there is a Methodist hospital across the street. Coming down the street closer to where I live there is another adult toy store. A block from that toy store, with one of the large 24 screen theaters belonging to one of the large national theater chains in-between, there is a strip club. Going the other way, you have a fairly nice mall. And this is in a nice suburb outside of the city limits where it is largely Republican Christians. Gays have nothing on heterosexuals.
I have yet to see a Porn Pride parade though. Unless MTV and HBO counts.
I've heard they
have those in Vegas in one of the Casinos -- it is about a week long if I understand right. They even have their own award shows to recognize the best at it.
You have no proof of that. I'm just calling it like I see it. And in the world of GLBT's you see a lot of erotica parading down the street.
Proof? The proof is in your own words. How ironic, I claim you have offered zero evidence, merely unsubstantiated opinion and you ask for proof? My proof is every post you've written in this thread but, in particular, in the post I responded to.
Bing! Second correct response. Jesus also taught that there would lot's of people "claiming" to be believers. And guess what we are to do about that?
Nothing more than to keep them out of your own church. Again, Christ clearly stated they would be separated at judgment, that until then believers were merely to sow seeds and let the weeds and tares grow together.
Bzzz. Wrong again. The OP is about a real lesbian pair suing Christians that would not work at their "marriage." But, as we can see, the Lesbians would not tolerate diversity for Christians.
False, two lesbians sued a business that happened to be owned by Christians for not following the law. If these Christians had refused service to a handicapped couple would you still support them? Regardless of your personal feelings about the difference, it is the same law protecting both. These laws were created to stop a form of segregation, where people were discriminated against by businesses simply because of who they are. Now, you can argue that they aren't necessary and write your government representatives telling them to repeal these laws but it doesn't change the fact that the Christian business owners went against local law.
Confidence is not haughtiness. You are on error response #3. I admitted it once or twice. But it is not appropriate here and now.
Why is it not appropriate here? You're post if filled with haughtiness, much like the haughtiness of the Pharisees. You clearly show here that you are the one who knows the truth and those that disagree with you are wrong and not Christian. In fact, you belittle me because I dare to call you on some of what you claimed.
I have no plank or speck in my eye about Jesus and his teaching on marriage. I know what is right and what is wrong and what is violated and what is not. There is no such thing as same-gender marriage according to Jesus. Please let's debate that somewhere else. No spin "pleeeeease?"
Are you aware of the OP?
And I think you've proven you do have a plank. You act as if every gay is some in your face, porn addicted, drag queen, self-absorbed, haughty, Pagan, extreme liberal, Christian-hating caricature. When some of us try to call you on this caricature you try to create and prove to you that very few gays actually fit that profile, you try ridicule and misdirection to hide the fact that you provide absolutely no evidence of how your caricature represents any gays, much less the majority.
)
