This would have been much easier had you just watched the video yourself. I am sure your sensitive computer would have survived the ordeal.
Rumble should be partitioned from the internet, but that's not the subject here.
Let me try to clear up your misunderstanding and my summary. The plain clothes capitol policeman found the bomb first I didn’t make that entirely clear.
No, I got that part. It was clear.
He waked over to DC police and secret service parked side by side not far from where the potential bomb lay and reported to them. No one showed any immediate concern walking close by themselves and allowing pedestrians to also walk with a few feet.
This sounds like they were just keeping calm, or one of them didn't communicate it correctly (misheard, etc.), or didn't believe it was real (perhaps they trusted the USSS to have done the protection correctly in preparation).
Now the problem is this in another discussion of this a former secret service agent said there are protocols for things like this and none of them were followed.
Was in Dan Boingo-boingo? I have no problem believing the protocols were not properly followed. That does not make this a conspiracy.
No one acted like there was a potential live explosive device near the building where Kamala was inside.
What were you expecting, wild panic? Remember that any sudden change in stance can trigger a panic. I would suspect that the standard procedure for a possible live device would be to quietly block out the area and calmly remove the protectee by another path. The second part certainly happened. (It was a pipe bomb, which is a nasty thing to any humans near it, but it wasn't going to knock down the building or anything. Just get away from any window that could send shattered glass and the chance of injury is basically zero.)
The grounds should have been swept before her arrival that morning. The bomb was placed there 17 hours before the events I described captured on video. Missed by everyone until capital police found it.
No one doubts that part. It does call into question the "bomb search" part of the protection protocol. (The higher police presence does seem to be how it was eventually found, almost too late.
1. Why no immediate concern. 2. Why casual walk near the potential life threatening device 3. Why allow civilian pedestrians (children) to walk near the device.
I gave some possible explanations above. No reason to recapitulate. Remember that they could have made errors in applying their decisions. (Something that seems likely, frankly.)
4. Why try to bury this video until its release was forced by either a Senator or House member. 5. Why was this potential assassination attempt on a future Vice President not a big deal give the hupla over the protest at the Capital.
The investigation of the bombing attempt is still underway and the motives are not clear, nor the perpetrators. I've seen a lot of speculation online about the persons and motive which I will not repeat as they are not based on facts. (I hold myself, not just my computer, to higher standards than Rumble videos.)
6. Why had Kamala never capitalized on the optics of having her life in great danger.
perhaps she isn't an egotist, or she doesn't want to make a big deal of it, or she was traumatized by it and doesn't want to relive it. (It could also be that as a USSS protectee, she doesn't want to bring extra attention to the Service or give nuts any ideas. [There are also security reasons to keep quiet.])
7. There is video of FBI claiming this was a live device which makes no sense at all given the facts surrounding this event.
Determination of the device as "live" is done by close examination of it. That is not something the officers and agents would have done in the moment. It is possible that some of those responding in the immediate of the time and place of discovery thought it was a fake/dud and that explains some of their reactions to it. Nothing about the post-incident determination of "live device" status alters the way in which the response happened in the moment (including any errors in belief they had).
There much more about this and other events around Jan 6 that raises questions but the liberal accepted spin dominates while evidence was hidden, identities protected, videos held back to the public. Anything not supporting the supposed right wing insurrection was suppressed.
Sure dude.
Anyone who truly cares about what really happened that day would actually look at all evidence available.
I have looked at gobs of evidence from that day including a detailed examination of the bomb placement. I haven't seen any video of the discovery of the "DNC bomb", but I would look at it if you have a safer site for it like YouTube.
I am sorry your computer is so sensitive it might be damaged by truth.
Not truth, computer attacks. I wouldn't trust sites like Rumble if they were connected to the internet with a 10-foot airgap.
The public has not been given all the facts on this and msm will never report truth on this.
The facts are legion and I have seen far more of them than most people, and certainly most you will discuss these events with.
