Contempt For Ordinary Voters Undermines Opposition To Trump

Vambram

Born-again Christian; Constitutional conservative
Dec 3, 2006
2,690
1,081
59
Saint James, Missouri
✟72,671.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
GOP legislators looked specifically at which forms of ID were least likely to be owned by minority groups. So they didn't need belief, they used data to figure out how to disenfranchise voters.
You have not proven anything factual here.
 
Upvote 0

iluvatar5150

Well-Known Member
Aug 3, 2012
25,545
24,498
Baltimore
✟564,295.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
You have not proven anything factual here.
The Wapo article I linked to summarized things fairly well. The Brennan Center has a bunch of documents from the case (albeit with just a list of the supporting evidence, not the evidence itself)

The 4th Circuit's Decision:

Summarized here:
 
  • Informative
Reactions: KCfromNC
Upvote 0

Vambram

Born-again Christian; Constitutional conservative
Dec 3, 2006
2,690
1,081
59
Saint James, Missouri
✟72,671.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
The 4th Circuit Court of Appeals is dominated by 12 judges nominated by liberal Presidents. Only 7 of the 19 were nominated by a Republican President. This is a liberal dominant Court of Appeals.
 
Upvote 0

iluvatar5150

Well-Known Member
Aug 3, 2012
25,545
24,498
Baltimore
✟564,295.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
The 4th Circuit Court of Appeals is dominated by 12 judges nominated by liberal Presidents. Only 7 of the 19 were nominated by a Republican President. This is a liberal dominant Court of Appeals.

The decision came down in 2016, when 6 of the current judges (3 from Trump, 3 from Biden) were not serving, and 2 former judges (both from GWB) were. That would've put the balance at 6 R - 9 D.


Regardless, the case only went before 3 of them.

But even if you disagree with their political persuasions, the decision describes a number of facts that led to their decision. Have you bothered to read it?
 
Upvote 0

KCfromNC

Regular Member
Apr 18, 2007
28,741
16,052
✟489,984.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
You have not proven anything factual here.
That's true, I'm not part of the court whose findings of fact included the fact that the GOP worked to "target African-Americans with almost surgical precision". I'm simply reporting what they did find when they looked at the evidence.
 
  • Like
Reactions: iluvatar5150
Upvote 0

Fantine

Dona Quixote
Site Supporter
Jun 11, 2005
37,309
13,350
✟1,125,802.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
No one has contempt for ordinary voters. We have contempt for demagogues who lie to them and manipulate their emotions. We have contempt for legislators who, fully aware that they are promoting a liar and a fraud, kow-tow to him due to fear and threats.
We have contempt for media who subvert democracy and condone criminality.
We are sad ordinary voters have been manipulated and duped.
 
  • Like
Reactions: iluvatar5150
Upvote 0