That is not what you said. You said:
“This is what we know, therefore it had to be this way”.
I submit it is a gross mischaracterization to suggest that this how evolutionists think - you are representing them as highy dogmatic and close-minded. And I suggest there is no evidence for this.
Well, show me evidence to the contrary. Show me an evolutionist that says "we know evolution exists, but it might actually not apply to people". Such people do exist, I am one of them, but I wouldn’t categorize myself as an evolutionist.
No, I am believing the facts that the world offers us and suggesting that Scripture is not to be taken literally in all instances.
I never said scripture is to be taken literally in all instances
I never said that I only believe things if there is evidence. I believe quite a few things for which there is little, if no, evidence. Such as the resurrection.
Right. And the virgin birth? All people have a human mom and a human dad. But not Jesus. So if God could make Jesus as a miracle, why couldn't He make Adam as a miracle? Why did the first person had to have a biological mom and dad?
If the evidence for evolution is overwhelming, and I suggest that it is, who is really the fool? Is it not the person who denies the manifest evidence that the world presents us with?
Again, nobody denies that evidence exists, but we need to consider
all evidence. And we need to allow for possibility of other explanations of the origins of the species that would be compatible with the evidence. Evolution is just one explanation. It's a pretty good one, but still, it's only one of many possibilities. In case of people, there is scriptural evidence for how God defines a person that is incompatible with the theory of evolution.
I believe that scripture teaches that the resurrection of all believers will be a physical one - so we "get out brains" back, as it were. If this is the case, nothing is "lost". I am suggesting that the idea of an immaterial soul is not that stongly supported in scripture and is really something that has been "imported" into Christian thinking from Greek thinking (where there is indeed an immaterial soul). But even if there is an immaterial soul, how is this inconsistent with the theory of evolution? Could not such a soul be "inserted" by God into a body that is the product of millennia of evolution?
Sure, God could have taken a human ancestor and “inserted” a soul into him. But then people were not created by evolution. Even our bodies could not have been created by evolution. Maybe by some form of genetic engineering coupled with supernatural “soul insertion”, but not by natural evolution the way we understand it. Look at my proof, it actually has very little to do with an immaterial soul.