Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Christian Forums is looking to bring on new moderators to the CF Staff Team! If you have been an active member of CF for at least three months with 200 posts during that time, you're eligible to apply! This is a great way to give back to CF and keep the forums running smoothly! If you're interested, you can submit your application here!
Well, those who believe Communion is symbolical might not care that much because it's the "symbol what it counts".
We try to accommodate peoples needs but at the end of the day, it's a sacred rite or sacrament. Grape juice isn't exactly the same as wine, and without a clear biblical instruction that it is an acceptable subtsitute, churches do not err if they only use wine.
The use of the word "wine" does not mean it is in reference to an alcoholic substance. That is modern day thinking from an alcohol focused culture.
Grape juice did not exist as a commercial product in the ancient world due to the presence of wild yeasts on the grapes themselves, which would quickly break down the grape juice within a few days. Grape juice would not be invented until the late 19th century, using pasteurization.
I never understood the theology behind that since Jesus had bread and wine. When I was growing up I never had a church that offers bread and wine even when they say they follow the Bible. Does anybody know the reason Evangelical churches have this change?
Grape juice did not exist as a commercial product in the ancient world due to the presence of wild yeasts on the grapes themselves, which would quickly break down the grape juice within a few days. Grape juice would not be invented until the late 19th century, using pasteurization.
The Roman Catholic, Lutheran, and Episcopal/Anglican churches do communion with wine. They have no fear of alcohol.
Many Evangelical churches have VERY strong positions against any drinking alcohol or eating things made with alcoholic things what so ever - and so they forbid taking wine at communion.
They couch it with all sorts of scriptural sounding doctrinal statements - but it boils down to a fear of alcoholism and tempting those who suffer from alcoholism.
Places like Oklahoma (very Bible belt, Baptisty kind of religion predominates) have some of the strictest controls on alcohol in the country (you can't even buy regular beer in a grocery store, and no wine either), yet have alot of problem drinking going on.
Then don't drink any fruit juice or eat any fruit, because they all contain the same, or even more, alcohol than what you will find in a sip of communion wine.
Even yogurt and fermented foods have some alcohol. Kefir, a trendy yogurt-like drink, can have up to 2% alcohol. Kombucha is also mildly alcoholic.
There's a reason the human body tolerates alcohol, because we evolved as creatures eating fruit as a substantial part of our diet.
If it were wrong for the whole congregation to avoid wine, why is it not wrong for those of us who must avoid wine for medical/addiction reasons? Surely if drinking grape juice is wrong for the whole congregation, it must also be wrong for the individual?Accommodations are made by the churches for recovering alcoholics. If we instead switch everyone to grape juice, which Our Lord did NOT use at the Last Supper, how are we any better off as far as the alcoholic is concerned? We aren't. Meanwhile, we are proceeding in a non-Scriptural way for the whole congregation.
I didn't say that it was. However, I think the point stands. If one person has to be accommodated for health reasons--and the churches do that--there is no logical reason for the whole church to adopt a policy that affects every member.If it were wrong for the whole congregation to avoid wine, why is it not wrong for those of us who must avoid wine for medical/addiction reasons?
I know you didn't - my point is that surely if it is wrong for one person, it is wrong for all. If it is right for one, it is right for all. Otherwise, there seems to be a kind of double standard.I didn't say that it was.
Accommodations are made by the churches for recovering alcoholics. If we instead switch everyone to grape juice, which Our Lord did NOT use at the Last Supper, how are we any better off as far as the alcoholic is concerned? We aren't. Meanwhile, we are proceeding in a non-Scriptural way for the whole congregation.
I know you didn't - my point is that surely if it is wrong for one person, it is wrong for all. If it is right for one, it is right for all. Otherwise, there seems to be a kind of double standard.
Do people who have special dietary problems and for whom the church finds a way to work with them at Communion feel that they are being treated as aliens? I have met people and know of people with such needs and not a one has ever talked as though they felt discriminated against or as though they were treated as an outsider because of it. In fact, the rest of the congregation would have to be very, very alert to even know that an accommodation was being made.If there was no problem with the beverage, then there should be no need for special accommodations to try and make it look like certain people should be treated like they are aliens from the rest of the body.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?