- Sep 3, 2018
- 63
- 69
- 27
- Country
- United Kingdom
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- In Relationship
What's the difference between baptist, methodist and orthodox?
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
What's the difference between baptist, methodist and orthodox?
I agree. And the differences are substantial.You're better searching them individually, but principally they hold different theological beliefs and traditions(or lack of traditions).
If you search for each of their beliefs you will be able to see the differences.
What an interesting (if self-serving) way to describe the biggest of all formal splits in church history.To understand the differences you have to understand the protestant reformation. There was once only one Church, with a few exceptions. It was made up of the Roman (Catholic) Church of the West, and the Eastern (Orthodox) Churches of the East.
I would say one of the biggest differences is in the area of Sacraments vs Ordinances.What's the difference between baptist, methodist and orthodox?
As far as I know, there have always been Christians who remained outside of the Institutional Churches. Waldensians, Albigensians, and many Baptists trace their beliefs through churches that remained beyond the institutions.To understand the differences you have to understand the protestant reformation. There was once only one Church, with a few exceptions. It was made up of the Roman (Catholic) Church of the West, and the Eastern (Orthodox) Churches of the East.
Aside from the schism between the Western and Eastern Churches, some members of the Western Church broke away from Rome, and formed their own "denominations", each with its own beliefs.
Those denominations then split into more denominations and still further denominations, of which Baptists, Presbyterians, Methodists, Jehovah's Witnesses, Mormons, etc., are all descended from.
Between them all, you will find some common beliefs and some divergent beliefs. To understand each denomination's set of beliefs you would need to read each one's statement of faith.
The Orthodox Churches have maintained their original beliefs and teachings from the beginning, with no need of "reform".
There is baptism: dedication and confirmation. When a baby is baptized that is a dedication service where the Parent, Godparents, Family, Friends and all the members of the Church agree to do all they can to raise the child as a Christian. Then when the child is of age they make a decision for themselves if they want to become a Christian and if they want to join the church.What's the difference between baptist, methodist and orthodox?
Yes ... we call that "Believer's Baptism," as opposed to "Infant Baptism."I left the Baptist Church because I wanted to get my son baptized and the pastor would not do it. He was maybe 5 or 6 years old and they did not think he was old enough or had enough understanding to be baptized. Even though he had learned a little bit in sunday school classes.
The Anglo Church of England must be your exception. They were not a part of anything. Not Greek, not Orthodox & not reformed. In America the Anglo Church became the Episcopalian Church and through John Wesley the Methodist Church. A few other churches began with Wesley and his Holiness Movement.There was once only one Church, with a few exceptions.
I would say one of the biggest differences is in the area of Sacraments vs Ordinances.
As I understand it, a sacrament has redemptive power, meaning it is necessary for salvation; whereas an ordinance does not have such power.
That's why we view sacraments as "salvation by works;" rather than "salvation by grace."
We independent, fundamental, Baptists recognize only two ordinances: Baptism and the Lord's Table.
No sacraments.
It almost sounds like your definition is what we would call an ordinance: an outward show of an inward decision.Here is the United Methodist definition of a sacrament: Something consecrated or holy. Traditionally, a Christian ordinance manifesting an inward, spiritual grace by an outward, visible sign or symbol. United Methodists recognize two sacraments: baptism and Holy Communion.
Thanks for the correction.bekkilyn said:We are indeed saved by grace alone and not by a sacrament or ordinance or any other work.
We are told that the latter rain will be greater then the formal. Yet a lot of Churches are still trying to get back to the early rain and what the Church received in the beginning. I had a friend die because he did not believe that healing was for today but only for the early church.The Orthodox Churches have maintained their original beliefs and teachings from the beginning, with no need of "reform".
You are saved when you produce fruit. Galatians: "But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, and self-control." If the tree does not produce fruit it is cut down and thrown into the fire. The seed is in the fruit so the tree is able to reproduce itself. Although Paul says as gentiles we are branches grafted into the tree. The Everson Museum of Art has a Tree with 40 different Fruit.Question: Once you're saved by grace through faith, do the sacraments keep you saved?
I thought it was the other way around?You are saved when you produce fruit.
As far as I know, there have always been Christians who remained outside of the Institutional Churches. Waldensians, Albigensians, and many Baptists trace their beliefs through churches that remained beyond the institutions.
There is plenty of history on this. Unless you don't consider these groups to be Christian Churches.I have heard people say the same thing but it isn't true.
There is plenty of history on this. Unless you don't consider these groups to be Christian Churches.
Have you read The Trail of Blood, by J.M. Carroll?There is no history at all to prove that Waldensians existed very much beyond the reformation.
The Albigensians weren't Christian.