• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • Christian Forums is looking to bring on new moderators to the CF Staff Team! If you have been an active member of CF for at least three months with 200 posts during that time, you're eligible to apply! This is a great way to give back to CF and keep the forums running smoothly! If you're interested, you can submit your application here!

What are the Different Types of Dispensationalists?

Status
Not open for further replies.

LamorakDesGalis

Well-Known Member
Sep 22, 2004
2,198
235
Dallas Texas
✟18,598.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
The different types of dispensationalists are as follows:

1) Traditional dispensationalists
2) Progressive dispensationalists
3) Classical dispensationalists
4) Mid-Acts dispensationalists
5) Acts 28 dispensationalists

Traditional dispensationalism
The traditional view is the majority view for dispensationalists today. Walvoord and Ryrie are two traditional dispensational authors. The Revised Scofield Bible of the 1960s also reflects a traditional dispensational view, which is why traditional dispensationalists are also called "Revised" dispensationalists.

Progressive dispensationalism
The progressive view is a recent development within dispensationalism from the 1990s. The primary difference is seen in how closely the covenants relate to one another. Bock, Blaising and Saucy are 3 primary progressive dispensational authors. Unlike the other types which tend to segregate from other types, progressive and traditional dispensationalists worship together and work together. Progressives and traditional dispensationalists comprise which is often called mainstream dispensationalism.

Classical dispensationalism
Earlier dispensational writers such as Darby and Chafer are referred to as classical dispensationalists. Their views differ from traditional dispensationalists. The early Scofield Bible (but not the Revised Scofield Bible) reflects a classical dispensational view. There are few classical dispensationalists today. Miles Stanford is one of those very few who espouse a classical dispensationalist viewpoint.

Mid-Acts dispensationalism
The Mid-Acts view holds that the beginning of the church began somewhere in Acts 8-13 (there are several positions on this). This differs from the mainstream and classical dispensationalists who all hold that the church began in Acts 2. Cornelius Stam and Charles Baker are two Mid-Acts authors. The Mid-Acts view is also a minority view within dispensationalism.

Acts 28 dispensationalists
As the name would imply, Acts 28 dispensationalists hold that the church began at the end of Acts. This view began with E.W. Bullinger. The Mid-Acts position is historically a "moderating" view resulting from this one. Today the Acts 28 view is rare.

Other Terms
The Grace Movement - A movement which began in the 1930s and holds to a Mid-Acts and Calvinistic perspective.

Hyper-dispensationalist - Label often given by mainstream dispensationalists to Mid-Acts and Acts 28 views. Label also given by Mid-Acts dispensationalists to the Acts 28 view. Term is often used in an inflammatory and even derogatory sense.

Pauline dispensationalist - 1) Miles Stanford refers to his Classical view as Pauline dispensationalism, and 2) Mid-Acts dispensationalists refer to their position as Pauline dispensationalism. The result is that people often confuse Stanford for a Mid-Acts dispensationalist, but Stanford instead holds to a classical view.

Revised dispensationalist - Synonym for a traditional dispensationalist.

Ultra-dispensationalist - Scholarly synonym for hyper-dispensationalist, it is applied to the Mid-Acts and Acts 28 positions.
 

Jerrysch

Senior Veteran
Apr 13, 2005
3,714
23
✟4,104.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
The different types of dispensationalists are as follows:

1) Traditional dispensationalists
2) Progressive dispensationalists
3) Classical dispensationalists
4) Mid-Acts dispensationalists
5) Acts 28 dispensationalists

Traditional dispensationalism
The traditional view is the majority view for dispensationalists today. Walvoord and Ryrie are two traditional dispensational authors. The Revised Scofield Bible of the 1960s also reflects a traditional dispensational view, which is why traditional dispensationalists are also called "Revised" dispensationalists.

Progressive dispensationalism
The progressive view is a recent development within dispensationalism from the 1990s. The primary difference is seen in how closely the covenants relate to one another. Bock, Blaising and Saucy are 3 primary progressive dispensational authors. Unlike the other types which tend to segregate from other types, progressive and traditional dispensationalists worship together and work together. Progressives and traditional dispensationalists comprise which is often called mainstream dispensationalism.

Classical dispensationalism
Earlier dispensational writers such as Darby and Chafer are referred to as classical dispensationalists. Their views differ from traditional dispensationalists. The early Scofield Bible (but not the Revised Scofield Bible) reflects a classical dispensational view. There are few classical dispensationalists today. Miles Stanford is one of those very few who espouse a classical dispensationalist viewpoint.

Mid-Acts dispensationalism
The Mid-Acts view holds that the beginning of the church began somewhere in Acts 8-13 (there are several positions on this). This differs from the mainstream and classical dispensationalists who all hold that the church began in Acts 2. Cornelius Stam and Charles Baker are two Mid-Acts authors. The Mid-Acts view is also a minority view within dispensationalism.

Acts 28 dispensationalists
As the name would imply, Acts 28 dispensationalists hold that the church began at the end of Acts. This view began with E.W. Bullinger. The Mid-Acts position is historically a "moderating" view resulting from this one. Today the Acts 28 view is rare.

Other Terms
The Grace Movement - A movement which began in the 1930s and holds to a Mid-Acts and Calvinistic perspective.

Hyper-dispensationalist - Label often given by mainstream dispensationalists to Mid-Acts and Acts 28 views. Label also given by Mid-Acts dispensationalists to the Acts 28 view. Term is often used in an inflammatory and even derogatory sense.

Pauline dispensationalist - 1) Miles Stanford refers to his Classical view as Pauline dispensationalism, and 2) Mid-Acts dispensationalists refer to their position as Pauline dispensationalism. The result is that people often confuse Stanford for a Mid-Acts dispensationalist, but Stanford instead holds to a classical view.

Revised dispensationalist - Synonym for a traditional dispensationalist.

Ultra-dispensationalist - Scholarly synonym for hyper-dispensationalist, it is applied to the Mid-Acts and Acts 28 positions.

As in many different systems of thought, most people do not neatly fit into one slot or another. Many, it seems to me, seem to have a bit of this and a bit of that. For myself, I did not wake up one day and say "hey, today I will become a dispensationalist!". It actually snuck up on me! Two issues which did not come out clearly in your (rather good) overview. Firstly the use of a consistant literal or plain hermenunic:

Literal hermeneutics. Dispensationalists claim that their principle of hermeneutics is that of literal interpretation.[5] This means interpretation that gives to every word the same meaning it would have in normal usage, whether employed in writing, speaking, or thinking.[6] It is sometimes called the principle of grammatical-historical interpretation since the meaning of each word is determined by grammatical and historical considerations. The principle might also be called normal interpretation since the literal meaning of words is the normal approach to their understanding in all languages. It might also be designated plain interpretation so that no one receives the mistaken notion that the literal principle rules out figures of speech. Symbols, figures of speech, and types are all interpreted plainly in this method, and they are in no way contrary to literal interpretation. After all, the very existence of any meaning for a figure of speech depends on the reality of the literal meaning of the terms involved. Figures often make the meaning plainer, but it is the literal, normal, or plain meaning that they convey to the reader.
“THE HERMENEUTICS OF DISPENSATIONALISM” Pt.1
by Charles C. Ryrie



And Secoundly maintaining a distinction between Israel and the church:​



Because of a consistent literal interpretation of both the Old Testament promises and prophecies Classic Dispensationalism teaches that God has a distinct program for Israel and a distinct program for the Church. Dispensationalists recognize that the New Testament never calls the Church “the new Israel”, “spiritual Israel”, or “Israel”. He simply takes God’s word at face value, never to blur the distinction of Israel and the Church or replace Israel with the Church.

http://www.geocities.com/jeremyandrobin/systemsoftheology.htm

(not my website)

These are two principles which I have supported for some time now, even before I "discovered" that I was/had been a dispensationalist.











 
Upvote 0

LamorakDesGalis

Well-Known Member
Sep 22, 2004
2,198
235
Dallas Texas
✟18,598.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Jerrysch,
Good post.

I'm attempting to write a series of questions which would eventually become part of a FAQ or sticky for this forum. In this thread I was just trying to cover the basic types (without writing a dissertation).

I have a previous thread that covers the essence, and one thing I failed to mention there was a literal hermeneutic...:doh:


Lamorak Des Galis
 
Upvote 0

Tychicum

Well-Known Member
May 4, 2006
931
2
✟16,092.00
Faith
Protestant
Pauline dispensationalist - 1) Miles Stanford refers to his Classical view as Pauline dispensationalism, and 2) Mid-Acts dispensationalists refer to their position as Pauline dispensationalism. The result is that people often confuse Stanford for a Mid-Acts dispensationalist, but Stanford instead holds to a classical view.

My view is quite along side of MJS.

Your definitions are accurate and helpful.

One note is that for many decades the Acts 28 view was called "Bullingerism" or "Ultra-Dispensational". I disagree with Bullingerites ... but they are more accurate (less damaging) than many/most ... which ain't saying much for the "most".

Today the term "Ultra-dispensationalist" is just a term one throws out to label someone you disagree with ... there doesn't seem to be any consistent application ... the term really has no meaning unless the person slinging the term actually takes the care to define their use of the word.

.:thumbsup:
 
Upvote 0

Tychicum

Well-Known Member
May 4, 2006
931
2
✟16,092.00
Faith
Protestant
I have a previous thread that covers the essence, and one thing I failed to mention there was a literal hermeneutic...:doh:


Lamorak Des Galis
... also don't forget that most all dispensational views are "futurist" in terms of prophecy outlook and that we seem to agree that God fully intends on keeping His promises ... literally ... to Israel.


.
 
Upvote 0

LamorakDesGalis

Well-Known Member
Sep 22, 2004
2,198
235
Dallas Texas
✟18,598.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
My view is quite along side of MJS.

Your definitions are accurate and helpful.

One note is that for many decades the Acts 28 view was called "Bullingerism" or "Ultra-Dispensational". I disagree with Bullingerites ... but they are more accurate (less damaging) than many/most ... which ain't saying much for the "most".

Today the term "Ultra-dispensationalist" is just a term one throws out to label someone you disagree with ... there doesn't seem to be any consistent application ... the term really has no meaning unless the person slinging the term actually takes the care to define their use of the word.

... also don't forget that most all dispensational views are "futurist" in terms of prophecy outlook and that we seem to agree that God fully intends on keeping His promises ... literally ... to Israel.

.:thumbsup:

Thanks for the feedback, I hope to cover all the bases in the stickies. I think its safe to say all dispensationalists are futurists and premillennialists.

And yes, it is unfortunate the way people sometimes use terms like hyperdispensationalist or ultradispensationalist. We should take the time to try and understand rather than quickly label.

BTW, do you refer to yourself as a Pauline dispensationalist?

Lamorak Des Galis
 
Upvote 0

LittleLambofJesus

Hebrews 2:14.... Pesky Devil, git!
Site Supporter
May 19, 2015
125,550
28,589
74
GOD's country of Texas
Visit site
✟1,237,300.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Libertarian
... also don't forget that most all dispensational views are "futurist" in terms of prophecy outlook and that we seem to agree that God fully intends on keeping His promises ... literally ... to Israel.
Yes, I am sure they await this "redemption" with baited anticipation. :wave:
Ephesians 1:14 which is an earnest of our inheritance, to the redemption/apolutrwsin <629> of the acquired possession, to the praise of His glory.
Luke 21:20 `And when ye may see Jerusalem surrounded by encampments, then know that come nigh [#1448] did her desolation; ............28 and these things beginning to happen bend yourselves back, and lift up your heads, because your redemption/apolutrwsiV <629> doth draw nigh.'[#1448]
Romans 3:24 being declared righteous freely by His grace through the redemption/apolutrwsewV <629> that [is] in Christ Jesus,
http://www.christianforums.com/t3122554-see-you-in-hell.htmlhttp://ourworld.cs.com/preteristabcs/id84.htm

[FONT=Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif].........Given the unique nature of this Pauline doctrine in a letter which is supposed to correct eschatological misconceptions, it must be asked if it is appropriate to assume that Paul is here innovating a completely new teaching. Proper pedagogy elucidates the unclear by the clear, not by the unprecedented. Why would Paul have concocted a &#8220;general assumption of all believers,&#8221; a doctrine which has no basis in any other Jewish or Christian teaching, in hopes of alleviating misunderstanding among the Thessalonians regarding the fate of their departed? It should rather be supposed that Paul is not teaching a general rapture at all. That this verse involves a literal rapture of believers is far from necessary, particularly in light of 1QM which may well form the conceptual background for much of this pericope. .....................[/FONT]
 
Upvote 0

eph3Nine

Mid Acts, Pauline, Dispy to the max!
Nov 7, 2005
4,999
6
78
In the hills of Tennessee
✟5,251.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Thanks for the feedback, I hope to cover all the bases in the stickies. I think its safe to say all dispensationalists are futurists and premillennialists.

And yes, it is unfortunate the way people sometimes use terms like hyperdispensationalist or ultradispensationalist. We should take the time to try and understand rather than quickly label.

BTW, do you refer to yourself as a Pauline dispensationalist?

Lamorak Des Galis
Amen...well said Lemorak...trying to understand would go a long way towards the possibility of someone actually SEEING the differences that we present.

I know your question was to Tychie, so I wont answer it...as you already know I am mid acts.
 
Upvote 0

Tychicum

Well-Known Member
May 4, 2006
931
2
✟16,092.00
Faith
Protestant
BTW, do you refer to yourself as a Pauline dispensationalist?

Lamorak Des Galis
Yes most often.

On the fact that Paul received the revelation ...for this dispensation ...and when... I agree with the Mid-Acts folks.

But when one receives the revelation and when it is actual and effective can be quite different things ... so in fact I am a poor fit for the Mid-Acts label.

Well that ... and on "other" issues I part ways ... I use many translations of Scripture but favour the Authorized version ... and from my observation many Mid-Acts folks are KJVO. And I am stoutly "Calvinistic" ... (although I don't quite fit into the whole of the TULIP framework) ... and many Mid-Acts folks seem to be Arminian ...

But I admit I have the world of respect for any and all dispensational flavours. Some in my opinion being "more right".

Because the difference between interpreting Scripture "dispensationally" ... and not ... is the difference between recognizing God's plan Systematicly and understanding its organization ... as opposed to a form of simple and random "bliss".

And we all know what "bliss" is ...
 
Upvote 0

LamorakDesGalis

Well-Known Member
Sep 22, 2004
2,198
235
Dallas Texas
✟18,598.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Amen...well said Lemorak...trying to understand would go a long way towards the possibility of someone actually SEEING the differences that we present.

Yes. Defining terms are the key such as gospel, Pauline, etc.

I know your question was to Tychie, so I wont answer it...as you already know I am mid acts.

I would also like you to answer - I want to know how Mid-Acts folks refer to themselves collectively as well.
 
Upvote 0

LamorakDesGalis

Well-Known Member
Sep 22, 2004
2,198
235
Dallas Texas
✟18,598.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
You could also say that there are only 2 types:

1. Those that are right.
2. Those that are wrong.

It's much simpler that way.

(I'm number 1. of course)

And the right ones are definitely funny...:D
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.