• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • Christian Forums is looking to bring on new moderators to the CF Staff Team! If you have been an active member of CF for at least three months with 200 posts during that time, you're eligible to apply! This is a great way to give back to CF and keep the forums running smoothly! If you're interested, you can submit your application here!

The Messiah Before Jesus? "Simon of Perena?"

Lilly Owl

Since when is God's adversary a curse word here?
Dec 23, 2012
1,839
97
✟2,609.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Libertarian
I was watching a History channel program this morning that was talking about the record account of a man named, Simon of Perena. Seems his story that predates Christ has a great number of similarities to what later accompanied the story of Jesus.



As told on what's called the Jesselson Stone, due to the name of the man who found it. Also known as, The Gabriel Revelation Stone. Due to line 80, in a greatly faded stone where Gabriel commands a prince of princes to do something after three days. No one knows what because time has rendered the stone to be virtually unreadable.

Anyone else heard of this?

The Messiah Before Jesus? - YouTube
 
C

Carmella Prochaska

Guest
In 4 BCE, king Herod the Great died. Immediately, there were several revolts against the rule of his son and successor, Herod Archelaus. One of the rebels was Simon of Peraea, who claimed the kingship for himself. The fact that was a slave, is of no importance: slaves could be highly educated and civilized people. Simon of Peraea may have have 'put a diadem on his head', and his men must have created sufficient trouble to make the Romans send in the legions, but there are no indications that he was considered the Messiah.

Hillel Halkin in his blog in The New York Sun wrote that the Jesselsohn Stone "would seem to be in many ways a typical late-Second-Temple-period eschatological text" and expressed doubts that it provided anything "sensationally new" on Christianity's origins in Judaism.

Retired professor, Stan Seidner contends that it reflects the Apocalyptic beliefs of the day, many which are found in the Dead Sea Scrolls, as antecedent and predictive writings of Christianity. He also suggested the use of infra-red technological applications, similar to what had been utilized on Dead Sea Scroll Material in the recent past. Challenging Knohl's "Two Messiahs" theory, Seidner noted that, "Knohl’s reliance upon what he calls, the 'Glorification Hymn,' in support of a first Messiah’s relationship with King Herod, failed in its carbon-14 testing. It predates Herod’s ascendency to the throne by at least twelve years and as much as one hundred and fifty six." However, he does agree with Knohl's interpretation of the inscription,"to rise from the dead within three days." Ben Witherington, on the other hand – an Early Christianity expert at Asbury Theological Seminary in Wilmore Kentucky – claims that a word interpreted as "rise" could just as easily be taken to mean "show up".

Victor Sasson, a biblical scholar and specialist in Hebrew and Aramaic epigraphy, disagrees with Knohl, objecting:

"...the whole issue of this 'h>yh' suggested by Knohl is not only precarious, but also suspect. He had previously suggested a thesis regarding a resurrected Jewish mashiah, and has now found an opportunity with this letter Het to support his thesis. The other words that he supplies in line 80, with the exception of the existing 'I Gabriel' are in fact his own!"
 
Upvote 0