In THIS way all Israel will be saved

[tonychanyt]

Ro 11:

23 If they [the Jews] do not continue in their unbelief, will be grafted in, for God has the power to graft them in again. 24 For if you were cut from what is by nature a wild olive tree, and grafted, contrary to nature, into a cultivated olive tree, how much more will these, the natural branches, be grafted back into their own olive tree. 25 Lest you be wise in your own sight, I do not want you to be unaware of this mystery, brothers a partial hardening has come upon Israel, until the fullness of the Gentiles has come in.

Because of the Jews' unbelief in Jesus, a partial hardening was upon Israel.

26 And in this way all Israel will be saved,

In what way?

as it is written,
“The Deliverer will come from Zion,
he will banish ungodliness from Jacob”;
27 “and this will be my covenant with them when I take away their sins.”

When the fullness of the Gentiles has come in, the Deliverer will banish ungodliness from Jacob. God will save the godly remnant of Israel.

In what way will all Israel be saved?

Paul outlined the broad timeline. In his time, the Jews were hardened. They didn't believe in Jesus. Paul focused on the Gentiles. They were grafted in. The time of the Gentiles began. The gospel spread among Gentile nations for the last two millennia. Some day in the future, the fullness of the Gentiles will be accomplished. The Deliverer will come from Zion. He will preach Jesus to Israel. Then all (the remnant of) Israel will be saved in Christ.

 

[Grafted In]

What I find exciting is that as He gradually lifts the veil, we who are hungry for deeper understanding will find Jews with, perhaps prophetic, but certainly deeper than might interest the average Christian, revelations from Scripture as well as an all new way to look things.
Some may recognize this as a subject that I reported to you in the past one of my favorite interests in Scripture.

 

[Jeff Saunders]

Ro 11:


Because of the Jews' unbelief in Jesus, a partial hardening was upon Israel.


In what way?


When the fullness of the Gentiles has come in, the Deliverer will banish ungodliness from Jacob. God will save the godly remnant of Israel.

In what way will all Israel be saved?

Paul outlined the broad timeline. In his time, the Jews were hardened. They didn't believe in Jesus. Paul focused on the Gentiles. They were grafted in. The time of the Gentiles began. The gospel spread among Gentile nations for the last two millennia. Some day in the future, the fullness of the Gentiles will be accomplished. The Deliverer will come from Zion. He will preach Jesus to Israel. Then all (the remnant of) Israel will be saved in Christ.

why do you add ( the remnant of) Israel when its not in the scripture it just says all Israel ? why add to scripture .

 

[tonychanyt]

why do you add ( the remnant of) Israel when its not in the scripture it just says all Israel ? why add to scripture .

I did not add to scripture. I have no such authority to modify scripture. I interpreted it.

Let proposition P1 = Tony Chan has the authority to modify scripture.

Is P1 true?

 

[Clare73]

why do you add ( the remnant of) Israel when its not in the scripture it just says all Israel ? why add to scripture .

"In this way/"thus" (Ro 11:26). . .the way of/as in Ro 11:25, a hardening, blindness in part (some of them). . .so that only some of Israel is saved; i.e., the remnant (true Israel) of Ro 11:5. All true Israel (i.e., the remnant) will be saved.

 

[Jeff Saunders]

"In this way/"thus" (Ro 11:26). . .the way of/as in Ro 11:25, a hardening, blindness in part (some of them). . .so that only some of Israel is saved; i.e., the remnant (true Israel) of Ro 11:5. All true Israel (i.e., the remnant) will be saved.

So you are saying that all Israel can’t be saved because of the Romans versus but why can’t you just as easily say that the verses in Romans can’t mean that only the remnant are saved because Paul said all of Israel not part. It really comes down to what verse trumps what verse.

 

[Jeff Saunders]

I did not add to scripture. I have no such authority to modify scripture. I interpreted it.

Let proposition P1 = Tony Chan has the authority to modify scripture.

Is P1 true?

I don’t understand who is Tony Chan and what does that have to do with anything?

 

[Clare73]

So you are saying that all Israel can’t be saved because of the Romans versus but why can’t you just as easily say that the verses in Romans can’t mean that only the remnant are saved because Paul said all of Israel not part. It really comes down to what verse trumps what verse.

The context shows that it is referring to all true Israel, the ones not hardened as the rest of Israel.

 

[eleos1954]

Ro 11:


Because of the Jews' unbelief in Jesus, a partial hardening was upon Israel.


In what way?


When the fullness of the Gentiles has come in, the Deliverer will banish ungodliness from Jacob. God will save the godly remnant of Israel.

In what way will all Israel be saved?

Paul outlined the broad timeline. In his time, the Jews were hardened. They didn't believe in Jesus. Paul focused on the Gentiles. They were grafted in. The time of the Gentiles began. The gospel spread among Gentile nations for the last two millennia. Some day in the future, the fullness of the Gentiles will be accomplished. The Deliverer will come from Zion. He will preach Jesus to Israel. Then all (the remnant of) Israel will be saved in Christ.

There aren't any Jews or gentiles .... we are all one in Christ. It's all about ones relationship with Christ ... not about the earthly ... it's about the heavenly. Anyone can come to Christ now and until His return.

• Colossians 3:11
  “Here there is no Gentile or Jew, circumcised or uncircumcised, barbarian, Scythian, slave or free, but Christ is all, and is in all”
• • 1 Corinthians 12:13
    “For we were all baptized by one Spirit so as to form one body—whether Jews or Gentiles, slave or free—and we were all given the one Spirit to drink
  • 
    
  • “remnant” as it’s used in the Bible, it refers to a group of people who remain loyal to God after a time of hardship (not just jews or Israel)
  • 
    
  • Scripture tells us who will make up this end-time remnant: those “who keep the commandments of God and hold to the testimony of Jesus” (Revelation 12:17).

 

[Clare73]

There aren't any Jews or gentiles .... we are all one in Christ.

That applies only to the NT church, it does not apply to those outside the NT church.

It's all about ones relationship with Christ ... not about the earthly ... it's about the heavenly. Anyone can come to Christ now and until His return.

• Colossians 3:11
  “Here there is no Gentile or Jew, circumcised or uncircumcised, barbarian, Scythian, slave or free, but Christ is all, and is in all”
• • 1 Corinthians 12:13
    “For we were all baptized by one Spirit so as to form one body—whether Jews or Gentiles, slave or free—and we were all given the one Spirit to drink
  • 
    
  • “remnant” as it’s used in the Bible, it refers to a group of people who remain loyal to God after a time of hardship (not just jews or Israel)
  • 
    
  • Scripture tells us who will make up this end-time remnant: those “who keep the commandments of God and hold to the testimony of Jesus” (Revelation 12:17).

 

[eleos1954]

That applies only to the NT church, it does not apply to those outside the NT church.

The church are all those in Christ.

• Colossians 1:18: "He is also the head of the body, the church"
  
  
• Ephesians 5:23: "For the husband is the head of the wife as Christ is the head of the church, his body, and is himself its Savior"
  
  
• Ephesians 5:24: "The church submits to Christ"
  
  
• 1 Timothy 6:15: "He is also King of kings—sovereign over every earthly authority"

 

[tonychanyt]

I don’t understand who is Tony Chan and what does that have to do with anything?

Tony Chan is me. I am the one whom you are accusing of adding to scripture.

Let proposition P1 = Tony Chan has the authority to modify scripture.

Is P1 true?

This is the 2nd time I have asked.

 

[Jeff Saunders]

Tony Chan is me. I am the one whom you are accusing of adding to scripture.

Let proposition P1 = Tony Chan has the authority to modify scripture.

Is P1 true?

This is the 2nd time I have asked.

I am sorry but I don’t understand what you are trying to get at with the “ Let proposition P1= Tony Chan has the authority to modify scripture “ this is what I don’t understand.

 

[tonychanyt]

I am sorry but I don’t understand what you are trying to get at with the “ Let proposition P1= Tony Chan has the authority to modify scripture “ this is what I don’t understand.

Let proposition P1 = Tony Chan has the authority to modify scripture.

Is P1 true?

This is the 3rd and the last time I have asked. I prefer to interact with people who can think and write propositionally.

 

[Grafted In]

The context shows that it is referring to all true Israel, the ones not hardened as the rest of Israel.

I think in the context of its use, God hardened them and He will lift that veil one day and then all who would have believed had God not hardened their hearts and blinded them will be saved.
Perhaps I'm wrong but that's how I understand it at this point.

 

[Jeff Saunders]

Let proposition P1 = Tony Chan has the authority to modify scripture.

Is P1 true?

This is the 3rd and the last time I have asked. I prefer to interact with people who can think and write propositionally.

Sorry I prefer to interact with people who can have a conversation and I sure don’t understand yours.