Freemasonry and the number 666

[waves]

Recently I came across a Freemason Jamaican website that showed something interesting. For example on November 8 2017 and every year the following is seen either RX: Blue Mountain 666, RX Blue Mountain Installation, or simply RX 666. So if the Mark of The Beast is nothing but superstition why have Freemasonry set aside specific days to focus specifically on 666. It is because Freemasons support the number 666 and see it as a good thing instead of a bad thing. Is this leading the government of Jamaica to push for a National Identity System.? Is the support of the number 666 tied in with the National Identification? Are Freemasons in Jamaica actively supporting 666 which is motivating them to push for the NIDS, the answer is Yes.


Calendar of Jamaican Freemasonry


*** Every Jamaican and other persons should examine this calendar and save it less it be taken down or edited, which I am sure it will be.

 

[Tolworth John]

if the Mark of The Beast is nothing but superstition why have Freemasonry set aside specific days to focus specifically on 666

Because freemasonry is nothing but ritual and supersition.

 

[Antig]

Ignore freemasonry

 

[Albion]

Freemasonry has NOT set aside specific days to focus on 666.

This appears to be related to the number of the lodge. All lodges, as they are formed, are given a sequential number. As can happen with your car's license plate, you may wind up with 666 and not like that. Here's an excerpt from an article about a lodge in Iowa that was in the same situation:

"CEDAR RAPIDS -- Kingston Lodge No. 666, Ancient Free and Accepted Masons, wants to change its lodge number.

"The number 666 isn't a great one for a spiritually based organization to have, given that the Bible says the number is "the mark of the beast," explains Tim Anderson, senior warden of Lodge No. 666.

"It's the book of Revelation that says believers in Christ will be tested in the world's last days by an Antichrist, who will persecute those who do not bear "the mark of the beast," the number 666.

"The members of the lodge felt . . . to have a number that has a negative spiritual connotation was just not the right thing. There's no deep mystery to it," Anderson said Monday."

 

[BABerean2]

 

[waves]

Freemasonry has NOT set aside specific days to focus on 666.

This appears to be related to the number of the lodge. All lodges, as they are formed, are given a sequential number. As can happen with your car's license plate, you may wind up with 666 and not like that. Here's an excerpt from an article about a lodge in Iowa that was in the same situation:

"CEDAR RAPIDS -- Kingston Lodge No. 666, Ancient Free and Accepted Masons, wants to change its lodge number.

"The number 666 isn't a great one for a spiritually based organization to have, given that the Bible says the number is "the mark of the beast," explains Tim Anderson, senior warden of Lodge No. 666.

"It's the book of Revelation that says believers in Christ will be tested in the world's last days by an Antichrist, who will persecute those who do not bear "the mark of the beast," the number 666.

"The members of the lodge felt . . . to have a number that has a negative spiritual connotation was just not the right thing. There's no deep mystery to it," Anderson said Monday."

Cedar Rapids is not in Jamaica.


Blue Mountain is the highest mountain in Jamaica. In the occult, nature itself is thought to be sacred including mountains. For e.g God gave me a dream showing a very high mountain and a UFO hovering over it. Additionally numbers are important in freemasonry. 33 degrees is the highest degree and as a result they conduct activities according to this number as well as other numbers.

 

[Albion]

Cedar Rapids is not in Jamaica.

I didn't say that it was. I said the situation was similar in that the 666 number is just the number of the lodge. A little further investigation into the Jamaican lodge shows this to be the case with them as well as the one in Iowa. That's all that the calendar entry you saw was referring to.

Additionally numbers are important in freemasonry. 33 degrees is the highest degree and as a result they conduct activities according to this number as well as other numbers.

666 isn't included in that and you can see this from what is reported in the article about the Iowa lodge. And 3 is the highest you can go in Masonry before you're a Master Mason; there's nothing higher.

The 33rd degree refers to a related order, the Scottish Rite, to which most Masons do not belong, but it has nothing to do with this anyway.

 

[Davy]

Recently I came across a Freemason Jamaican website that showed something interesting. For example on November 8 2017 and every year the following is seen either RX: Blue Mountain 666, RX Blue Mountain Installation, or simply RX 666. So if the Mark of The Beast is nothing but superstition why have Freemasonry set aside specific days to focus specifically on 666. It is because Freemasons support the number 666 and see it as a good thing instead of a bad thing. Is this leading the government of Jamaica to push for a National Identity System.? Is the support of the number 666 tied in with the National Identification? Are Freemasons in Jamaica actively supporting 666 which is motivating them to push for the NIDS, the answer is Yes.


Calendar of Jamaican Freemasonry


*** Every Jamaican and other persons should examine this calendar and save it less it be taken down or edited, which I am sure it will be.

Quit wasting your time and read British Mason John Robison's book Proofs Of A Conspiracy he wrote in 1798. It's online by the way, and free. You'll learn all you need to know about the Masonic lodge.

 

[Albion]

Quit wasting your time and read British Mason John Robison's book Proofs Of A Conspiracy he wrote in 1798. It's online by the way, and free. You'll learn all you need to know about the Masonic lodge.

I've read it.

In Robinson's book, you may remember, the conspirators were not Masons but, instead, part of the Illuminati bunch that tried to recruit Masons for their upstart organization.

 

[Davy]

I've read it. In Robinson's book, you may remember, the conspirators were not Masons but, instead, part of the Illuminati bunch that tried to recruit Masons for their upstart organization.

If you read it then you know that continental Masonry was different than British Masonry, the British original only have 3 degrees. Weishaupt's Illuminati order added all the multitude of degrees to continental Masonry, which is where the 33rd degree, etc., originated, and is bogus.

So when looking at USA's founding fathers, whom many were Masons, not all of them were influenced by the French lodges of continental Masonry, though Ben Franklin definitely was as he was an ambassador to France then and obviously picked up some of Weishaupt's garbage ideas, and Thomas Jefferson also with him. Thus there was a split among the politics of the founding fathers of the USA also.

 

[Albion]

If you read it then you know that continental Masonry was different than British Masonry, the British original only have 3 degrees. Weishaupt's Illuminati order added all the multitude of degrees to continental Masonry, which is where the 33rd degree, etc., originated, and is bogus.

So when looking at USA's founding fathers, whom many were Masons, not all of them were influenced by the French lodges of continental Masonry, though Ben Franklin definitely was as he was an ambassador to France then and obviously picked up some of Weishaupt's garbage ideas, and Thomas Jefferson also with him. Thus there was a split among the politics of the founding fathers of the USA also.

Uh, no. At least as regards that part about Franklin and Jefferson.

American Masonry was an extension of British Masonry and has always been dead set against the occultish lodges of the Grand Orient (on the continent) which are not even considered to be Masonic by American Masons.

 

[Davy]

Uh, no. At least as regards that part about Franklin and Jefferson.

American Masonry was an extension of British Masonry and has always been dead set against the occultish lodges of the Grand Orient (on the continent) which are not even considered to be Masonic by American Masons.

But today, the Blue Lodge is the popular American masonry form, and is from France. The American lodges were taken over a long time ago.

 

[Albion]

But today, the Blue Lodge is the popular American masonry form, and is from France. .

It's from Britain. So, for that matter, is Prince Hall Masonry. And it is a mistake when people try to defame Masonry by associating it with all these other pretenders.

 

[Davy]

It's from Britain. So, for that matter, is Prince Hall Masonry. And it is a mistake when people try to defame Masonry by associating it with all these other pretenders.

It's all... Grand Orient.

 

[Postvieww]

Those who claim Christ as their savior should never align themselves with an organization with occult ties such as the Freemasons. It is sad to hear Christians try to defend and sanctify this satanic organization.

 

[Albion]

Those who claim Christ as their savior should never align themselves with an organization with occult ties such as the Freemasons. It is sad to hear Christians try to defend and sanctify this satanic organization.

Freemasonry is neither Satanic nor occultish.

If it were, most of the membership--being Christian--would resign. Other people, who can only judge by gossip, a website, or sensationalist publications, really have no personal knowledge. As a result, they are ripe for believing whatever they've been told--almost always by still other people who likewise have no direct knowledge of Masonry.

 

[Postvieww]

Freemasonry is neither Satanic nor occultish.

If it were, most of the membership--being Christian--would resign. Other people, who can only judge by gossip, a website, or sensationalist publications, really have no personal knowledge. As a result, they are ripe for believing whatever they've been told--almost always by still other people who likewise have no direct knowledge of Masonry.

Hi Albion, thanks for your response. We will just have to disagree. I am all too aware that many Christians are involved in this organization. It is my opinion most do not even know the facts about the organization or they would leave it. I personally know masons and have had detailed discussions about its history and practices. I also own a copy of “ Morales and Dogma” which is very enlightening and most definitely non Christian. I do not make the charges in my post lightly or without research. There is no scriptural support for involvement in any organization of secrecy or the swearing of oaths. If you would like to discuss details we can do that but I am not interested in name calling or being told how little I know about it. PS I probably know more about it than most 3rd degree masons, at least the ones I’ve talked to seem clueless and shocked when presented with the facts. In fact a friend of mine did leave the organization.

 

[Albion]

Hi, Postvieww.

Hi Albion, thanks for your response. We will just have to disagree. I am all too aware that many Christian are involved in this organization. It is my opinion most do not even know the facts about the organization or they would leave it.

Well, what have you experienced as a Mason yourself? No matter what you may have gleaned from conversations with some friends, you are not qualified to make the kinds of judgments you have made here without personal knowledge, without having been able to verify the lurid accusations that delight the conspiracy theorists. And I have most likely done much more research into their claims than you have.

I personally know masons and have had detailed discussions about its history and practices. I also own a copy of “ Morales and Dogma” which is very enlightening and most definitely non Christian.

...and does not speak for anyone except the author.

I do not make the charges in my post lightly or without research. There is no scriptural support for involvement in any organization of secrecy or the swearing of oaths.

Now, that is a bona fide concern, unlike all the silly talk about Satanism and Occult practices. If a person belongs to a fringe Christian denomination that holds that giving one's oath is wrong under all circumstances (which, I would hope, would apply also to giving it in court, when becoming a naturalized citizen, upon joining the military, etc.) then that should cause such a person to choose against membership in a lodge. My church is one that doesn't hold that view, so this does not represent a failing in Masonry or a policy that it at odds with Christianity. It's rather an honest disagreement among the churches.

I will also mention a similar issue--praying with members of other Christian churches (other than one's own, that is). There are some denominations that take this point very much to heart and oppose prayer with other Christians--so long as there is not a formal agreement among them on every point of doctrine (which is almost always lacking). Consequently, they oppose membership in the Boy Scouts or being present when an invocation is offered prior to the opening of a City Commission meeting or if prayer is offered before some banquet, etc.

Needless to say, that is not the view taken by the great majority of Christian churches, but if an individual belongs to one that does, he might do well not to seek membership in the Masons. However, it's not at all a matter of Masonry being at odds with Christianity.

 

[Postvieww]

Well, what have you experienced as a Mason yourself?

I have not experienced Islam myself but I know for a fact of what spirit it is.

 

[Albion]

I have not experienced Islam myself but I know for a fact of what spirit it is.

In fact, you have experienced Islam to some degree because of facts that are in the public arena.

That is quite a different matter from claiming--on the basis of virtually no evidence of any sort--that something is true concerning a matter that you are also claiming is a closely guarded secret!