- Feb 5, 2002
- 173,187
- 60,439
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Catholic
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Others
EDITORIAL: Despite the Democratic ticket’s attempts to skirt the issue, the facts show that Harris and Walz favor abortion at any time during a woman’s pregnancy.
In order to push forward “abortion rights” as the centerpiece of their campaign to win the White House, Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris and her running mate, Gov. Tim Walz of Minnesota, are seeking to obscure an ugly and deadly reality: that late-term abortions continue to take place in the United States.
Here’s another ugly and deadly reality: If Vice President Harris and Gov. Walz are elected next month, the numbers of late-term abortions are virtually certain to increase.
Harris and Walz have tried to skirt the issue of late-term abortions, implying that such abortions won’t be more easily available if their permissive national abortion policies come into force. They are trying to sidestep the matter for a simple reason: They know that killing unborn babies this late in pregnancy — at a stage of their development when only pro-abortion zealots can deny their full humanity — is opposed by the overwhelming majority of Americans.
The central dodge employed by the Harris-Walz ticket is to assert they are seeking merely to return to the legalized abortion framework that existed while Roe v. Wade was still in place. Under those rules, they claim, late-term abortions won’t be an issue at all. When pressed by former president Donald Trump, the GOP candidate, during their Sept. 10 presidential debate about the reality that late-term abortions occurred during the final months of pregnancy while Roe was in place, Harris countered, “That’s not true.”
Actually, it most definitely is.
Continued below.
www.ncregister.com
In order to push forward “abortion rights” as the centerpiece of their campaign to win the White House, Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris and her running mate, Gov. Tim Walz of Minnesota, are seeking to obscure an ugly and deadly reality: that late-term abortions continue to take place in the United States.
Here’s another ugly and deadly reality: If Vice President Harris and Gov. Walz are elected next month, the numbers of late-term abortions are virtually certain to increase.
Harris and Walz have tried to skirt the issue of late-term abortions, implying that such abortions won’t be more easily available if their permissive national abortion policies come into force. They are trying to sidestep the matter for a simple reason: They know that killing unborn babies this late in pregnancy — at a stage of their development when only pro-abortion zealots can deny their full humanity — is opposed by the overwhelming majority of Americans.
The central dodge employed by the Harris-Walz ticket is to assert they are seeking merely to return to the legalized abortion framework that existed while Roe v. Wade was still in place. Under those rules, they claim, late-term abortions won’t be an issue at all. When pressed by former president Donald Trump, the GOP candidate, during their Sept. 10 presidential debate about the reality that late-term abortions occurred during the final months of pregnancy while Roe was in place, Harris countered, “That’s not true.”
Actually, it most definitely is.
Continued below.
Fact-Checking Harris and Walz on Late-Term Abortion
EDITORIAL: Despite the Democratic ticket’s attempts to skirt the issue, the facts show that Harris and Walz favor abortion at any time during a woman’s pregnancy.
.png)
