- Mar 28, 2005
- 92
- 7
- 42
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Single
I was just reading this passage from one of the books by Bill Bright, the founder of Campus Crusade for Christ and creator of the 4 Spiritual Laws "style" of evangelism:
"Originally our first law emphasized man's sin, but the Lord impressed
me to emphasize God's love. This change was made just before we went to
press. I had done my final editing and had left Vonette and the girls
to finish the typing. As I had been traveling a great deal and it was
quite late, I had gone upstairs to bed. In fact, I was in bed just at
the point of going to sleep, when suddenly there came clear as a bell
to my conscious mind the fact that there was something wrong about
starting the Four Laws on the negative note of man's sinfulness. ... I
felt that few people would say `No' to Christ if they truly understood
how much He loves them and how great is His concern for them.
"So I got out of bed, went to the head of the stairs and called down to
Vonette and the girls to revise the presentation so that the first law
would be, `God loves you and has a wonderful plan for your life,'
instead of `You are a sinner and separated from God.' ... Thus the Four
Spiritual Laws started with the positive note of God's love and plan.
"Some time later, one of the girls said to me, `I was so distressed
over your change in the presentation that I wept that night. I was
afraid that you were beginning to dilute the gospel and that you were
no longer faithful to the Lord, because you placed such a strong
emphasis on the love of God rather than on man's sin. Now in
retrospect, I realize of course that this is one of the greatest things
that has ever happened to the Campus Crusade ministry'" (Bill Bright,
Come Help Change the World, Here's Life Publishers, 1985, pgs. 28,29).
In light of the actual 80-90% fall-away rate by backsliders as a result of modern methods such as Bright's that has recently been made aware, it is obvious that Bright's staff member was right when she wept and feared that Campus Crusade was diluting the gospel message. Instead of getting sinners to confront their sins directly from the beginning, the four spiritual laws presented a means by which a person can get a new buzz out of worldly life. Now, while I fully believe that Bright's heart intent was for the Harvest and the Great Commission, the actual Fruits of his methodology actually suggest that he was greatly deceived by a revelation that could not have been from God.
I don't mean to contradict the fact of God's love for sinners and we don't mean to say it's wrong to tell the unsaved of that love. God's love for the lost is exactly what the Gospel is about. But when approaching the unsaved, the great people God used through the ages such as Wesley, Spurgeon, Finney, Luther, the Apostles, Jesus himself and the Prophets emphasized God's holiness and his Just demands on a sinful mankind. They stressed man's sinful nature and the need to repent. This is the right way to approach the unsaved; it may not feel "wonderful" and does not fit in with the popular man-centred gospel Campus Crusade and it's followers promote, but it's God's Word.
The Bible actually doesn't start with God's love only. It starts with His character as Lord and with man's fall. The bible's first two thirds deals with this before we even get to the Gospel message.
Few could deny the sense of negativity of the Old testament, but why should we ignore the fact that the majority of the Bible consists of the Lord teaching and enforcing the standard of his righteousness within His Moral Law, as a means of laying a foundation for the presentation of the Gospel? The Evangelists and others responsible for Revivals within the Church History certainly followed the Bible's pattern in this. So did the Apostles. As did Jesus Christ himself in his 3 year mininstry on Earth.
Who are we to change this?
"Originally our first law emphasized man's sin, but the Lord impressed
me to emphasize God's love. This change was made just before we went to
press. I had done my final editing and had left Vonette and the girls
to finish the typing. As I had been traveling a great deal and it was
quite late, I had gone upstairs to bed. In fact, I was in bed just at
the point of going to sleep, when suddenly there came clear as a bell
to my conscious mind the fact that there was something wrong about
starting the Four Laws on the negative note of man's sinfulness. ... I
felt that few people would say `No' to Christ if they truly understood
how much He loves them and how great is His concern for them.
"So I got out of bed, went to the head of the stairs and called down to
Vonette and the girls to revise the presentation so that the first law
would be, `God loves you and has a wonderful plan for your life,'
instead of `You are a sinner and separated from God.' ... Thus the Four
Spiritual Laws started with the positive note of God's love and plan.
"Some time later, one of the girls said to me, `I was so distressed
over your change in the presentation that I wept that night. I was
afraid that you were beginning to dilute the gospel and that you were
no longer faithful to the Lord, because you placed such a strong
emphasis on the love of God rather than on man's sin. Now in
retrospect, I realize of course that this is one of the greatest things
that has ever happened to the Campus Crusade ministry'" (Bill Bright,
Come Help Change the World, Here's Life Publishers, 1985, pgs. 28,29).
In light of the actual 80-90% fall-away rate by backsliders as a result of modern methods such as Bright's that has recently been made aware, it is obvious that Bright's staff member was right when she wept and feared that Campus Crusade was diluting the gospel message. Instead of getting sinners to confront their sins directly from the beginning, the four spiritual laws presented a means by which a person can get a new buzz out of worldly life. Now, while I fully believe that Bright's heart intent was for the Harvest and the Great Commission, the actual Fruits of his methodology actually suggest that he was greatly deceived by a revelation that could not have been from God.
I don't mean to contradict the fact of God's love for sinners and we don't mean to say it's wrong to tell the unsaved of that love. God's love for the lost is exactly what the Gospel is about. But when approaching the unsaved, the great people God used through the ages such as Wesley, Spurgeon, Finney, Luther, the Apostles, Jesus himself and the Prophets emphasized God's holiness and his Just demands on a sinful mankind. They stressed man's sinful nature and the need to repent. This is the right way to approach the unsaved; it may not feel "wonderful" and does not fit in with the popular man-centred gospel Campus Crusade and it's followers promote, but it's God's Word.
The Bible actually doesn't start with God's love only. It starts with His character as Lord and with man's fall. The bible's first two thirds deals with this before we even get to the Gospel message.
Few could deny the sense of negativity of the Old testament, but why should we ignore the fact that the majority of the Bible consists of the Lord teaching and enforcing the standard of his righteousness within His Moral Law, as a means of laying a foundation for the presentation of the Gospel? The Evangelists and others responsible for Revivals within the Church History certainly followed the Bible's pattern in this. So did the Apostles. As did Jesus Christ himself in his 3 year mininstry on Earth.
Who are we to change this?