Calculations for Enoch's Calendar, Which is God's Calendar, Forever

[yeshuasavedme]

Someone else has worked out the minutes of Enoch's Calendar revelation to show how to count the year from beginning today, as God revealed it to be, in a 364 day year forever, with four stop days not counted at the beginning of each season, and added to the number of days at the end of the year.
I do not agree with all he says at all, and only post this for those who are glad someone else worked out the calculations to show us what day it is, in God's calendar, today and every day.

http://enochcalendars.webs.com/EnochSunriseSunsetCalendar.pdf

CALCULATIONS:
1)
2)
Today's Days Have 24 Hours Per Day & 60 Minutes Per Hour (1440/24=60)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
March 15th
Does Not Exist In The 364 Day Year
Enochs's Days Had 18 Parts Per Day & 80 Minutes Per Part (1440/18=80)
Enoch's Minutes Columns – Time Increases & Decreases By 80 Minutes Per Month
& Month Has 30 Days
Or
2.6667 Minutes Per Day
(80/30 = 2.6667)
Equivalent In Hours Columns – Time Increases & Decreases By
1 Hour & 20 Minutes Per Month
(Equal To Enoch's 80 Minutes Per Month), Or
2 Minutes & 40 Seconds Per Day
(80/30 = 2.6667 Minutes Where .6667 = 40 Seconds)
.6667 = 2/3rds Of One Minute (1 Minute = .3333+.3333+.3333) And One Minute = 20+20+20 Seconds
Today's Time Columns – Times Increase & Decrease By
40 Minutes Per Month
Or
1 Minute & 20 Seconds Per Day
(40/30 = 1.3333 Where .3333 = 20 Seconds)
March 16th
Is The Day That Has Equal Night & Day In Jerusalem And Is The 364th
Day That Ends The Year
The Corona-Australids Meteor Shower Peaks On March 16th Every Year and is another Sign of the Beginning Of The New Year. On March 16th, on the
Horizon of the
Southeast Sky, at least One Hour before Dawn, the Corona-Australids Meteor Shower can be seen at Latitudes between +40° To -90°.
It can be seen from the USA, Europe,
Middle East, China, Japan & All The Southern Hemisphere. It has an average Fall Rate of about 5 To 7 Meteors
Per Hour. Constellation Corona Australis (Southern Crown) borders the Constellations of Sagittarius, Scorpius, Ara and Telescopium.

...
See The Book Of Enoch - Ethiopic Text Translated By R. H. Charles, Chapter 72 For Time Calculation Details

And another

Enoch Calendar - ENOCH CALENDAR - The Book of Enoch Reveals The Enoch Calendar
...
Later, when the Hebrew people adopted the Julian Calendar in 45 BCE, the 7 Day Week continued as usual and the Names of the Week Days remained the same, so the Hebrew people felt that the calendar changes would not affect them. However, the extra Day that was added, for a 365 Day Year, totally disrupted the weekly Sabbath cycle, as only on a 364 Day Calendar will the Sabbath be on a Fixed Day of the week every year, like every Saturday. The extra 365th Day made the 7th Day rotate to a different day of the week beginning on the last day of the year.
The Julian calendar reduced each hour of the day by .0986 seconds so that the hour had 59 minutes and 50 seconds, and the change was so subtle that the Hebrew people were unaware that this minor change could affect anything, let alone their Sabbath Day. The .0986 seconds per hour equates to almost 4 minutes per day (236.7 seconds per day or 3.9452 minutes per day), that is taken out of each of the 364 days to create the 365th day. This is why our days are called Sidereal Days and have 23 hours, 56 minutes and 5 seconds. This “365th Created Day" is inserted into the calendar at the end of each year. The same procedure is followed in the year before the Leap Year (i.e. 2/28/2011, 2/28/2015, 2/28/2019, etc.) to create the Leap Day of February 29th in the following year, and this “Created Leap Day” is inserted into the calendar at the end of the 50th Week every 4th year (i.e. 2/29/2012, 2/29/2016, 2/29/2020, etc.)....

 

[Habakk]

This is one good reason that scholars strongly suspect that book of Enoch was written and also adds to the real clues of the actual date the book was written, possibly towards the end of the first century. There was dispute by the sages over how to calculate the years and Abib years at that particular time.

One group of sages, as was typical of the times, produced that portion of Enoch as their detailed theological argument. The book gives detail of the moon phases inconsistent with known astronomy.

This particular reasoning also confirms the true date that the book of Enoch was written. Certainly opposing any credibility that it might date back to the time of Enoch.

 

[yeshuasavedme]

This is one good reason that scholars strongly suspect that book of Enoch was written and also adds to the real clues of the actual date the book was written, possibly towards the end of the first century. There was dispute by the sages over how to calculate the years and Abib years at that particular time.

One group of sages, as was typical of the times, produced that portion of Enoch as their detailed theological argument. The book gives detail of the moon phases inconsistent with known astronomy.

This particular reasoning also confirms the true date that the book of Enoch was written. Certainly opposing any credibility that it might date back to the time of Enoch.

Scholars? I think not! and they prove themselves Not!
True date? I think not! And the date of copies of copies discovered in the DSS prove !Not!
"1st" century -the copies themselves of copies of copies....date to 3rd and 4th century -and that is only the copies.
Errors in astronomical calculations? Definitely not!
And so, if anyone wants to work out the true dates from creation and what number of the day of a week or the month itself, is, they can do so with Enoch's astronomical calendar.

God's day begins at sunset in Jerusalem -Mount Zion [which is the "navel of the earth" as God calls it in the OT]- and each season has a "stop" day at the head of the season, which is skipped, as to being numbered as a day of the week; so the 1st day of the week of each of the months that begin the four seasons is not numbered in the week days but is added to the number of days in the year at the end of the year.
For that reason, the days of the year began being numbered in ancient Israel on the fourth day of the week after the New Year.
So God's year has 360 days in it, and the four stop days are added to the number at the end of the year, making 364 total days in each year; and it never varies from year to year, throughout eternity, as Enoch wrote.

 

[YeShallTread]

God's day begins at sunset in Jerusalem -Mount Zion [which is the "navel of the earth" as God calls it in the OT]-

You are mistaken on the above point, which is the only one in your post that I am addressing.

Genesis 1:5 And God called the light Day, and the darkness he called Night. And the evening and the morning were the first day.

1:8 And God called the firmament Heaven. And the evening and the morning were the second day.

1:13 And the evening and the morning were the third day.

1:19 And the evening and the morning were the fourth day.

1:23 And the evening and the morning were the fifth day.

1:31 And God saw every thing that he had made, and, behold, it was very good. And the evening and the morning were the sixth day.


​

None of those days began at sunset as you believe. Rather they began at evening which is high noon when the sun is even = evening.

 

[Habakk]

Historically years differed in ancient Israel depending on the Abib year. There are complex arguments and disputes over it, this is likely why this part of Enoch was written. However why should it be given credibility if it differs from scripture and known astronomy principles.

 

[Noxot]

This particular reasoning also confirms the true date that the book of Enoch was written. Certainly opposing any credibility that it might date back to the time of Enoch.

faulty logic because the Egyptians still have done things that we can not do and we do not know how they did them.
there was a group of peoples that flew up in the air with hot air balloons long before we again conceived the idea to do it.

also:
if you can test the original script then you will know what time it is from perhaps. but you don't test copies and translations to learn what time period something came from.

the spiritual being that went by the name "jude" quote enoch as scripture, but as he spoke in his own letter, there will be people who reject authorities. but most people just reason from a human perspective and don't have faith that enoch is inspired by the Holy Spirit. i would say it is good for those people to not read enoch because they will only stumble all over the place. enoch is hard to understand just as revelation is just as paul is ectect.

anything without faith and love is sin anyways and so I think people who do not trust enoch should not read it. the bible most christians read is good enough for them to come to knowledge of the truth.

 

[Habakk]

faulty logic because the Egyptians still have done things that we can not do and we do not know how they did them.
there was a group of peoples that flew up in the air with hot air balloons long before we again conceived the idea to do it.

also:
if you can test the original script then you will know what time it is from perhaps. but you don't test copies and translations to learn what time period something came from.

the spiritual being that went by the name "jude" quote enoch as scripture, but as he spoke in his own letter, there will be people who reject authorities. but most people just reason from a human perspective and don't have faith that enoch is inspired by the Holy Spirit. i would say it is good for those people to not read enoch because they will only stumble all over the place. enoch is hard to understand just as revelation is just as paul is ectect.

anything without faith and love is sin anyways and so I think people who do not trust enoch should not read it. the bible most christians read is good enough for them to come to knowledge of the truth.

The dating comes from the historic setting and other historic facts not from dating techniques of copies. The point is not setting an exact date of its writing but ruling out the fact that it is an ancient book dating back to Enoch.

From the third century many authors used him as their spokesman, attributing all sorts of secret knowledge to his revelation.

Five of these texts were joined together at an unknown moment, and are now known as the First Book of Enoch. It is also called the Ethiopian Book of Enoch, because the book is best known from some forty such manuscripts from Ethiopia.

The “like” arguments about the Egyptians is not what I am saying. Enoch presents an ancient view of the earth not an astronomic correct one.

 

[Noxot]

I see your point about enoch being different books, I know some of it was written by noah, or claimed to be.

if we knew history perfectly then we could say that it was only in such and such time people thought this or that. there is never a supreme certainty in that kind of limited way of deciding what is from God and what is not. also... sometimes in translations... if a certain location is known to be this certain place but now is called by something different, they will sometimes choose the newer name of the location rather than the older.

people who understand the bible and scriptures of God from a literal and earthly view are always going to fall into the most absurd of errors.

I mostly believe that enoch is from God because of the spiritual people that quoted from it as scripture. I don't base my evidence on the physical reality, because I have faith, my eyes are opened and they are much better eyes than the eyes of the flesh.

people either have to say that jude was not quoting enoch as scripture or that jude was wrong. they most of the time take the politer argument even though both are absurd in my eyes. just eat whatever the Lord will give you, truly all anyone needs is God to teach them, if they have faith.

thank God for those scriptures that are without a doubt, from God! who in their right mind could ever deny that the 4 gospels are not from God? and yet they have so many contradictions in them. so that they push people to see them in a spiritual manner rather than from their human reasoning, which is polluted by the tree of knowledge of good and evil.

honestly how much do we really know about what happened in the times of enoch? i would say not that much due to it being farther back in time than moses. I mean, what books did moses and abram read if not enoch? or did they naturally just find God without other scriptures? that could be the case too, it would show that God is not contained within a book, but that he speaks to us in all kinds of ways.

 

[yeshuasavedme]

You are mistaken on the above point, which is the only one in your post that I am addressing.

Genesis 1:5 And God called the light Day, and the darkness he called Night. And the evening and the morning were the first day.

1:8 And God called the firmament Heaven. And the evening and the morning were the second day.



​

None of those days began at sunset as you believe. Rather they began at evening which is high noon when the sun is even = evening.

The evening begins the day.
Now, since day 1, beginning at Jerusalem, that is when the sun sets.

 

[YeShallTread]

The evening begins the day.
Now, since day 1, beginning at Jerusalem, that is when the sun sets.

So....you are offering a correction of your previous statement of, "God's day begins at sunset in Jerusalem -Mount Zion ?" I can't tell from what you wrote.

I would ask, if the "evening and the morning were the first day," then the day appears to BEGIN at evening which is 12:00 noon when the sun is even in the sky and ends twenty-four hours later. Then the setting sun is of no calculation in this particular equation.

 

[Steve Petersen]

It's as if the word 'pseudepigrapha' doesn't exist in some people's dictionaries.

'It has Enoch's name on it, so by golly, it must have been written by him!'

 

[Noxot]

It's as if the word 'pseudepigrapha' doesn't exist in some people's dictionaries.

'It has Enoch's name on it, so by golly, it must have been written by him!'

yeah jude must have been one ignorant dove.

whats with this other book jude quoted too???? hahaha lets not copy that one either because it's not from God.

I wonder why there is not a book called 'the assumption of moses' anymore? i guess the wise scribes Jesus was always rebuking knew better than jude too!

 

[Steve Petersen]

yeah jude must have been one ignorant dove.

There is no evidence that the Book of Enoch you refer to is the same one Jude referred to.

whats with this other book jude quoted too???? hahaha lets not copy that one either because it's not from God.

So, some random internet guy knows which books are from God and which are not?

I wonder why there is not a book called 'the assumption of moses' anymore? i guess the wise scribes Jesus was always rebuking knew better than jude too!

Take it up with God on why He let your precious books disappear and not make the canon.

 

[Noxot]

There is no evidence that the Book of Enoch you refer to is the same one Jude referred to.

and if no one copied the OT very much then I could say the same thing I suppose. the truth is, I have God dwelling inside of me and I can tell enoch is from YAH. I desire that, not many people read enoch because they will come to wrong conclusions about God, just like when they read the OT, they come up with a bunch of things that are not the nature of Jesus Christ who is God incarnate on the earth.

So, some random internet guy knows which books are from God and which are not?

i'm not random, I'm a child of God

Take it up with God on why He let your precious books disappear and not make the canon.

I don't mind not reading some of those books that jude loved, because I read books that jude would have wanted to read but did not. so I would say we are pretty even since God teaches both jude and noxot through His Holy Spirit.


hah btw i'm finding an utter contradiction that a messianic is also a libertarian. one of those things that keeps life a mystery I suppose.

 

[Steve Petersen]

I don't mind not reading some of those books that jude loved, because I read books that jude would have wanted to read but did not. so I would say we are pretty even since God teaches both jude and noxot through His Holy Spirit.

If God teaches you directly, why do you even need a Bible or other texts?

 

[Habakk]

and if no one copied the OT very much then I could say the same thing I suppose. the truth is, I have God dwelling inside of me and I can tell enoch is from YAH. I desire that, not many people read enoch because they will come to wrong conclusions about God, just like when they read the OT, they come up with a bunch of things that are not the nature of Jesus Christ who is God incarnate on the earth.


i'm not random, I'm a child of God




I don't mind not reading some of those books that jude loved, because I read books that jude would have wanted to read but did not. so I would say we are pretty even since God teaches both jude and noxot through His Holy Spirit.


hah btw i'm finding an utter contradiction that a messianic is also a libertarian. one of those things that keeps life a mystery I suppose.

That’s not a valid argument because many spiritual people have read Enoch and concluded that it’s not a work written by Enoch and carries no scriptural authority.

The OT gives an accurate view of Jesus Christ because it is inspired scripture. The book of Enoch is likely to corrupt true doctrinal truth.

In essence you are saying that Enoch is genuine because of your spiritual opinion. Then we need to agree to disagree because that is not a valid scriptural argument. I will stay with the Bible I have.

 

[yeshuasavedme]

You are mistaken on the above point, which is the only one in your post that I am addressing.

Genesis 1:5 And God called the light Day, and the darkness he called Night. And the evening and the morning were the first day.

1:8 And God called the firmament Heaven. And the evening and the morning were the second day.

1:13 And the evening and the morning were the third day.

1:19 And the evening and the morning were the fourth day.

1:23 And the evening and the morning were the fifth day.

1:31 And God saw every thing that he had made, and, behold, it was very good. And the evening and the morning were the sixth day.


​

None of those days began at sunset as you believe. Rather they began at evening which is high noon when the sun is even = evening.

Evening begins at sunset. There was evening of the one day before there was the light of the one day.
On day 4 of evenings and mornings, the sun was made and set in the heavens and was made to be the governor of the light created on day 1.
Ever after, the sun's going down marks the end of the one day and the beginning of another.

 

[Noxot]

If God teaches you directly, why do you even need a Bible or other texts?

that is like saying:

why don't you eat pizza if you can eat chicken fried steak?
why did angels minister to Jesus Christ even though He was God?
why do you not cut your arm off if you have 2 of them?

 

[Habakk]

that is like saying:

why don't you eat pizza if you can eat chicken fried steak?
why did angels minister to Jesus Christ even though He was God?
why do you not cut your arm off if you have 2 of them?

No.

 

[yeshuasavedme]

There is no evidence that the Book of Enoch you refer to is the same one Jude referred to.


.

You err on that, in that the book of Enoch was well known and well used in the day of Jesus -who quoted from it and preached His Gospel from its revelations which were already written about Himself -besides from Moses and all the other prophets, also; and so did His womb brothers, Jude and James quote from Enoch.
Also Paul, and the author of Hebrews [who may be Paul or Apollos], and Peter as well as about every early NT times writer of the faith that we have any of the copies of the writings of, quoted from Enoch and called it Scripture, which Jesus called it, also.
The Ethiopian Enoch has come down to this day kept as canon in the Ethiopian Bible precisely because the converts to the Gospel in Ethiopia were Jews who had, and used, Enoch, and who never abandoned it.
The Dead Sea Scrolls Enoch also agrees in totality with the same corresponding sections which there were found any fragments of copies of, as the Ethiopian Enoch manuscripts, which have never been hidden or lost.

As to the ridiculous claim that Enoch was changed, one can make much more of a claim for the OT, in that there is not complete agreement between many manuscripts -but we accept the Masoretic, mainly, which was put together and dates from the middle ages, only; nor are there any ancient original copies of the Torah or entire Tenach, or even entire manuscripts that date older, even, as the copies of the Book of Enoch which is in the Ethiopian Bible.