• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • Christian Forums is looking to bring on new moderators to the CF Staff Team! If you have been an active member of CF for at least three months with 200 posts during that time, you're eligible to apply! This is a great way to give back to CF and keep the forums running smoothly! If you're interested, you can submit your application here!

Biden White House Chief of Staff Suddenly Steps Down Among Mounting Scandals

Valletta

Well-Known Member
Oct 10, 2020
11,294
5,281
Minnesota
✟298,393.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
The departure of one of Biden’s most trusted aides at a time when the White House is coming under increasing scrutiny from the Department of Justice, as well as criticism from the mainstream media, signals further trouble ahead for a presidency that is already on the rocks.
To me the border is the worst scandal because it cost so many lives with Afghanistan not far behind. But appointing a special counsel to go after Trump at a time when the administration already knew about the classified documents at Penn and covering it up may be Joe's undoing. There are so many, the attacks on the border patrol when they knew it was not "whipping," the persecution of the non-violent people at the Capitol who were just there and the cover-up of the role of Nancy Pelosi and the FBI instigators, and gunning down Ashli Babbitt.
 
Last edited:

Pommer

CoPacEtiC SkEpTic
Sep 13, 2008
21,977
13,561
Earth
✟227,570.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Deist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Democrat
The departure of one of Biden’s most trusted aides at a time when the White House is coming under increasing scrutiny from the Department of Justice, as well as criticism from the mainstream media, signals further trouble ahead for a presidency that is already on the rocks.
To me the border is the worst scandal because it cost so many lives with Afghanistan not far behind. But appointing a special counsel to go after Trump at a time when the administration already knew about the classified documents at Penn and covering it up may be Joe's undoing. There are so many, the attacks on the border patrol when they knew it was not "whipping," the persecution of the non-violent people at the Capitol who were just there and the cover-up of the role of Nancy Pelosi and the FBI instigators, and gunning down Ashli Babbitt.
And another “normal” feature of White House politics is crouched in “scandal!”
 
Upvote 0

iluvatar5150

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Aug 3, 2012
28,996
28,542
Baltimore
✟701,043.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
And another “normal” feature of White House politics is crouched in “scandal!”
Lest anybody forget: at point in his presidency, Trump was on chief of staff #3 of 4.
 
Upvote 0

SavedByGrace3

Jesus is Lord of ALL! (Not asking permission)
Site Supporter
Jun 6, 2002
20,542
4,324
Midlands
Visit site
✟718,953.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
I suspect the swamp is about to abandon Biden. If the House decides to investigate and even call for impeachment, and if the Democrats begin to side with them... look for Biden to resign and we have the first black female president.
 
Upvote 0

SavedByGrace3

Jesus is Lord of ALL! (Not asking permission)
Site Supporter
Jun 6, 2002
20,542
4,324
Midlands
Visit site
✟718,953.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Upvote 0

Valletta

Well-Known Member
Oct 10, 2020
11,294
5,281
Minnesota
✟298,393.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Which puts an exclamation point on this event!
While it is true Kamala is far ahead percentage-wise of all for losing staff, this is at the particular moment for Joe similar to Nixon and Watergate.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Pommer
Upvote 0

Pommer

CoPacEtiC SkEpTic
Sep 13, 2008
21,977
13,561
Earth
✟227,570.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Deist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Democrat
While it is true Kamala is far ahead percentage-wise of all for losing staff, this is at the particular moment for Joe similar to Nixon and Watergate.
“Schrodinger’s ‘Biden’?”
A Biden too impaired by age to fully function in his official Capacity as POTUS but…is also the mastermind of a grand conspiracy to fire his own chief-of-staff? (And that’s as bad, as Nixon & Watergate, in terms of staffers leaving?)

You got it bad!
 
Upvote 0

Valletta

Well-Known Member
Oct 10, 2020
11,294
5,281
Minnesota
✟298,393.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
The coverup is what did Nixon in. In this case the Biden administration was aware that classified material was found at the Biden Center and they decided to cover-up it up while then naming a special counsel to go after Trump.
 
Upvote 0

FreeinChrist

CF Advisory team
Christian Forums Staff
Site Advisor
Site Supporter
Jul 2, 2003
150,943
19,424
USA
✟1,994,386.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
Lest anybody forget: at point in his presidency, Trump was on chief of staff #3 of 4.
There was a long list of departures by this point in Trump's presidency.

Ron McKlain served in that role the longest of any chief of staff for a Democratic President.


Ron Klain, President Joe Biden’s chief of staff, plans to leave his post at the White House after a record run in the role, according to a person familiar with the move.​
The longest-serving first chief of staff for any Democratic president, Klain oversaw an up-and-down two years for the administration. Last year’s difficult Afghanistan withdrawal and stubborn inflation also weakened Biden’s standing with the public. Biden, with his party holding narrow congressional majorities, piled up a number of major legislative wins and returned the U.S. to an alliance-first foreign policy, most notably in rallying the West in defense of Ukraine. It culminated with Democrats scoring better than expected results in the midterms.​
After Democrats held the Senate, Klain and several other top staffers expected to step away after the midterms opted to stick around a bit longer, buoyed by the electorate’s validation.​
Klain is expected to depart in the coming weeks. He finalized his decision to leave to coincide with the administration’s two-year anniversary, which he and other staffers marked Friday with a hearty celebration of their accomplishments.​
Doesn't sound like he is leaving because of scandals as the article in the OP implies.
 

Valletta

Well-Known Member
Oct 10, 2020
11,294
5,281
Minnesota
✟298,393.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
There was a long list of departures by this point in Trump's presidency.

Ron McKlain served in that role the longest of any chief of staff for a Democratic President.


Ron Klain, President Joe Biden’s chief of staff, plans to leave his post at the White House after a record run in the role, according to a person familiar with the move.​
The longest-serving first chief of staff for any Democratic president, Klain oversaw an up-and-down two years for the administration. Last year’s difficult Afghanistan withdrawal and stubborn inflation also weakened Biden’s standing with the public. Biden, with his party holding narrow congressional majorities, piled up a number of major legislative wins and returned the U.S. to an alliance-first foreign policy, most notably in rallying the West in defense of Ukraine. It culminated with Democrats scoring better than expected results in the midterms.​
After Democrats held the Senate, Klain and several other top staffers expected to step away after the midterms opted to stick around a bit longer, buoyed by the electorate’s validation.​
Klain is expected to depart in the coming weeks. He finalized his decision to leave to coincide with the administration’s two-year anniversary, which he and other staffers marked Friday with a hearty celebration of their accomplishments.​
Doesn't sound like he is leaving because of scandals as the article in the OP implies.
Politico--I would expect nothing else.
 
Upvote 0

FreeinChrist

CF Advisory team
Christian Forums Staff
Site Advisor
Site Supporter
Jul 2, 2003
150,943
19,424
USA
✟1,994,386.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
Politico--I would expect nothing else.
Yes, it skews left but is factual and reliable. As opposed to the very biased site your article is from.
 
Upvote 0

Pommer

CoPacEtiC SkEpTic
Sep 13, 2008
21,977
13,561
Earth
✟227,570.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Deist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Democrat
The coverup is what did Nixon in. In this case the Biden administration was aware that classified material was found at the Biden Center and they decided to cover-up it up while then naming a special counsel to go after Trump.
By notifying the relevant agencies and returning the documents to their proper places?
 
Upvote 0

Valletta

Well-Known Member
Oct 10, 2020
11,294
5,281
Minnesota
✟298,393.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
By notifying the relevant agencies and returning the documents to their proper places?By notifying the relevant agencies and returning the documents to their proper places?
By covering up a crime with national security at stake. The Justice Deparment chose not to secure the crime scenes and instead let people hired by Joe look around for classified documents. We don't know if the most damaging of documents will ever surface. Joe's been caught in a crime and he still refuses to say why he took the documents and if he provided documents to others. Were the documents left behind at Joe's residence documents records that foreign entities decided were of no value to them? When did he first take a classified document, we know a number of these classified documents date back to the time when he was a U.S. Senator.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

FreeinChrist

CF Advisory team
Christian Forums Staff
Site Advisor
Site Supporter
Jul 2, 2003
150,943
19,424
USA
✟1,994,386.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
By covering up a crime with national security at stake. The Justice Deparment chose not to secure the crime scenes and instead let people hired by Joe look around for classified documents. We don't know if the most damaging of documents will ever surface. Joe's been caught in a crime and he still refuses to say why he took the documents and if he provided documents to others. Were the documents left behind at Joe's residence documents records that foreign entities decided were of no value to them? When did he first take a classified document, we know a number of these classified documents date back to the time when he was a U.S. Senator.
You are working hard to make it like Biden committed a crime but you fall flat in it. IF Biden committed a crime, how much larger then is Trump's liability for the documents he purposely took and refused to give back. Let's compare.

Trump: The National Archives noted that documents were missing and contacted Trump, who refused to comply, eventually leading to a FBI raid.
Biden: When cleaning out his office at the Penn center, his lawyers found some classified documents and immediately turned them over. The National Archives did not have to ask.

Trump: About 11,000 documents were found, with 300 being marked classified spread around in boxes. Also, there was a document describing another country's defense capabilities and nuclear ability. That document was not secured.
Biden: Less than 20 from what I read. There were a few at the Penn Center and the rest found in his house, either by his lawyers or by an FBI search with Biden's lawyers present.

Trump: could be charged with willful obstruction as he fought to keep the records and was not honest when asked if there were more.
Biden: unless they can prove willful intent to keep the documents, there is no crime. There is no indication of willful intent.

You cannot scream that Biden committed a crime and give Trump a pass. As Biden did not obstruct, and in fact, let the National Archives know about the documents, he won't be charged. Besides, he is the sitting president. As the National Archives was unaware that the documents were gone, and it was the Biden team that let them know and returned them, there was no cover-up. That is an attempt to smear, but as I said, it falls flat.
 
  • Optimistic
Reactions: DaisyDay
Upvote 0

Valletta

Well-Known Member
Oct 10, 2020
11,294
5,281
Minnesota
✟298,393.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Classified documents found in Joe's residence date all the way back to the time he was a U.S. senator. Joe Biden had no authority as a United States Senator to declassify the documents he took, and possessed the classified documents in violation of U.S. law. That's an open and shut case. Additionally, documents have been found at multiple locations, in boxes in an unsecured in a garage is one place. Why, when, and where are the answers Joe Biden refuses to provide.
As to Trump, the National Archives boxed up documents and delivered those documents to Mar-a-lago. Then later they decided they wanted some back. Trump allowed the federal government to come in an look at what he had, the FBI was there but rather than take any they asked him to put a better lock on the door. Trump, at his own expense, complied. His attorneys were in negotiations over what documents the National Archives decided they wanted back when a large contingent of armed FBI agents raided Trump's residence, pawing through his wife's clothes and his son's room. Trump maintains he declassified the documents in question, the Justice Department says he did not but so far has been unable to prove their case.
In Biden's case the theft of classified documents was covered up, the first documents were found before the November elections and the story was uncovered by the press in January. If not for the press the coverup might have worked forever.
The National Archives is NOT the repository for all classified documents. Intelligence agencies maintain their own classified files. There is no reason to assume the classified documents Joe stole, particularly when he was a senator, were from the National Archives.
 
Upvote 0

FreeinChrist

CF Advisory team
Christian Forums Staff
Site Advisor
Site Supporter
Jul 2, 2003
150,943
19,424
USA
✟1,994,386.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
Classified documents found in Joe's residence date all the way back to the time he was a U.S. senator. Joe Biden had no authority as a United States Senator to declassify the documents he took, and possessed the classified documents in violation of U.S. law. That's an open and shut case. Additionally, documents have been found at multiple locations, in boxes in an unsecured in a garage is one place. Why, when, and where are the answers Joe Biden refuses to provide.
So a few docs were from when he was a Senator. He went from Senator to VP. We do not know what the content was about. That the docs were found in the Penn Center and two places in his home is not the big deal you are making it - "multiple locations". They were in locked areas.
There has to be proof of intent and the DOJ will not charge a sitting president.
As to Trump, the National Archives boxed up documents and delivered those documents to Mar-a-lago. Then later they decided they wanted some back.
That is simply not true at all! That is a lie. White house staff packed up the Trump's belongs and the documents which were found among the personal items. The policy is that the documents had to be returned once he was not president so the National Archives would NOT have packed them to be sent to Mar-a-lago. And they did not want "some back" - they wanted them all and wanted them once he stopped being president.

Some reality: Former aides recall secretively packing boxes during Trump's last days in White House because he thought he'd stay in office

According to the Times, the former Trump officials who were interviewed said they didn't recall seeing classified material going into boxes. But several of the people said that the packing had to happen in secret "to avoid being ordered to stop by Mr. Trump, who continued to assert that he had won the election."​
NBC News reported in August that once Trump realized his time as commander in chief was up, he hurriedly stuffed document after document into banker boxes and shipped them to his Palm Beach estate. Politico last month cited former aides who said the Oval Office and an adjacent private dining room only got packed up the weekend before Trump left the White House.​
Since then, Trump insisted docs were his when they were not his. It is why he refused to cooperate with the National Archives and why they had to have the FBI raid Mar-a-Lago.

Trump allowed the federal government to come in an look at what he had, the FBI was there but rather than take any they asked him to put a better lock on the door. Trump, at his own expense, complied. His attorneys were in negotiations over what documents the National Archives decided they wanted back when a large contingent of armed FBI agents raided Trump's residence, pawing through his wife's clothes and his son's room. Trump maintains he declassified the documents in question, the Justice Department says he did not but so far has been unable to prove their case.
THAT's a creative view of it!

Here is a timeline:

2021;
May 6: The Archives requests that Trump turn over missing records, and continues to ask for the documents until late December.
December: A Trump representative informs the Archives they located 12 boxes of material at Mar-a-Lago and the agency arranges for them to be securely brought back to Washington.

2022:
Jan. 18: Fifteen boxes of records, some containing classified material, are retrieved from Mar-a-Lago by Archives representatives.

Jan. 31: The Archives says in a statement that some of Trump's presidential records it received included "paper records that had been torn up by" the former president.

The Archives notes that under the Presidential Record Act, all records created by presidents must be handed over to the agency at the end of their administrations.

Feb. 9: The Archives' Office of the Inspector General sends a referral to the Justice Department requesting it investigate Trump's handling of records. The referral notes a preliminary review of the 15 boxes taken from Mar-a-Lago indicated they contained newspapers, printed news articles, photos, notes, presidential correspondence and "a lot of classified records." "Of most significant concern was that highly classified records were unfoldered, intermixed with other records, and otherwise unproperly [sic] identified," the referral stated.....

April 29: The Justice Department's National Security Division tells Corcoran that there are "important national security interests in the FBI and others in the intelligence community getting access to these materials."....

Aug. 5: The Justice Department seeks and obtains a search warrant for Mar-a-Lago from a federal magistrate judge in West Palm Beach.,,,,

The department says that prior to seeking the warrant, the FBI "uncovered multiple sources of evidence" indicating classified documents were still at Mar-a-Lago, despite the sworn certification made June 3.

Federal prosecutors say the FBI also "developed evidence that government records were likely concealed and removed from the Storage Room and that efforts were likely taken to obstruct the government's investigation."

The search warrant approved by the judge allows the FBI to search the "45 Office," which is Trump's office space at Mar-a-Lago, as well as all storage rooms and other rooms used or available to Trump and his staff where boxes could be stored.....

Aug. 8: The Justice Department executes the search warrant at Mar-a-Lago beginning around 10 a.m. At least two of Trump's lawyers, Christina Bobb and Lindsey Halligan, are present, and Bobb signs a receipt listing the property seized by the FBI at 6:19 p.m.


It reads different from your narrative.
In Biden's case the theft of classified documents was covered up, the first documents were found before the November elections and the story was uncovered by the press in January. If not for the press the coverup might have worked forever.
The National Archives is NOT the repository for all classified documents. Intelligence agencies maintain their own classified files. There is no reason to assume the classified documents Joe stole, particularly when he was a senator, were from the National Archives.
One, there is NO indication of "theft". Your use there is totally biased. If anyone stole, it was Trump. Two, there was no request from the National Archives for the records. Had Biden's lawyers not notified the Archives, nothing would have been known about it. But they were honest and did return them. That is not the behavior of those in a cover up.
 

rturner76

Domine non-sum dignus
Site Supporter
May 10, 2011
11,527
4,028
Twin Cities
✟842,537.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Green
Classified documents found in Joe's residence date all the way back to the time he was a U.S. senator. Joe Biden had no authority as a United States Senator to declassify the documents he took, and possessed the classified documents in violation of U.S. law. That's an open and shut case. Additionally, documents have been found at multiple locations, in boxes in an unsecured in a garage is one place. Why, when, and where are the answers Joe Biden refuses to provide.
As to Trump, the National Archives boxed up documents and delivered those documents to Mar-a-lago. Then later they decided they wanted some back. Trump allowed the federal government to come in an look at what he had, the FBI was there but rather than take any they asked him to put a better lock on the door. Trump, at his own expense, complied. His attorneys were in negotiations over what documents the National Archives decided they wanted back when a large contingent of armed FBI agents raided Trump's residence, pawing through his wife's clothes and his son's room. Trump maintains he declassified the documents in question, the Justice Department says he did not but so far has been unable to prove their case.
In Biden's case the theft of classified documents was covered up, the first documents were found before the November elections and the story was uncovered by the press in January. If not for the press the coverup might have worked forever.
The National Archives is NOT the repository for all classified documents. Intelligence agencies maintain their own classified files. There is no reason to assume the classified documents Joe stole, particularly when he was a senator, were from the National Archives.
How's the Kool-Aid taste?
 
Upvote 0

Pommer

CoPacEtiC SkEpTic
Sep 13, 2008
21,977
13,561
Earth
✟227,570.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Deist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Democrat
By covering up a crime with national security at stake. The Justice Deparment chose not to secure the crime scenes and instead let people hired by Joe look around for classified documents. We don't know if the most damaging of documents will ever surface. Joe's been caught in a crime and he still refuses to say why he took the documents and if he provided documents to others. Were the documents left behind at Joe's residence documents records that foreign entities decided were of no value to them? When did he first take a classified document, we know a number of these classified documents date back to the time when he was a U.S. Senator.
What a wonderful derail of your own thread…
What has any of ^^^this to do with the White House getting a new chief-of staff?
 
  • Like
Reactions: wing2000
Upvote 0