- May 24, 2015
- 4,304
- 2,075
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Eastern Orthodox
- Marital Status
- Single
- Politics
- UK-Conservative
There is a somewhat influential grouping of Calvinist churches (some SBC, some PCA, some independent/other/et cetera) called 9Marks which has attracted a number of criticisms, largely on unjust and heavy handed "church discipline". The blog Wartburg Watch has documented a number of unpleasant horror stories regarding this issue.
Two problems in particular trouble me. The first is this very disagreeable remark:
"In this context, the word “Christian” can be particularly problematic. To much of the Muslim world, America, Europe, and Russia are “Christian” societies, and whatever is true for those countries is true of Christianity. Thus, when a Central Asian Muslim asks me if I am a Christian, what they mean by “Christian” is an alcohol-drinking, pornography-watching, sexually promiscuous, picture-worshipping Eastern Orthodox or Roman Catholic person who is part of the culture that has attempted to conquer and oppress them for centuries. Therefore, I never simply say yes. However, since Christian is a biblical word, neither do I say no. I define who I am in biblical terms apart from their historical experience."
This unpleasant statement was part pf a broader post regarding missionary activity to Muslims, which I support, however, it seems this inflammatory approach regarding indigenous Christians in the region could do more harm than good. Source: http://9marks.org/article/putting-contextualization-its-place/
The second is the distressing number of instances documented on Wartburg Watch and elsewhere of people having hurtful experiences leaving 9Marks.
http://thewartburgwatch.com/2014/07...ed-in-the-9-marks-view-of-church-resignation/
It is my view that 9Marks should very much back off on the Church Discipline aspect; at some point I fear someone might well be able to accuse these Christians, who are Nicene Christians, of being a cult, based on these practices, and get away with it, which would be an extreme embarassment. I do not regard the PCA or SBC as being cults; I admire the work of the late Rev. Dr. James Kennedy on the subject of cults, as well as that of Al Mohler. What is more, I agree with the social conservativism of the PCA and SBC; 9Marks threatens to upset this, and IMO these denominations would be justified in directing their local churches to disassociate with 9Marks. 9Marks has a slick media presence, rather dramatically nicer than the websites of any Orthodox churches or the Vatican, so it is a pity that they cannot use this presence in a more broadly tolerant manner, and that they are associated with disagreeable practices in terms of church discipline which are attracting not unjusitifiable criticism.
Two problems in particular trouble me. The first is this very disagreeable remark:
"In this context, the word “Christian” can be particularly problematic. To much of the Muslim world, America, Europe, and Russia are “Christian” societies, and whatever is true for those countries is true of Christianity. Thus, when a Central Asian Muslim asks me if I am a Christian, what they mean by “Christian” is an alcohol-drinking, pornography-watching, sexually promiscuous, picture-worshipping Eastern Orthodox or Roman Catholic person who is part of the culture that has attempted to conquer and oppress them for centuries. Therefore, I never simply say yes. However, since Christian is a biblical word, neither do I say no. I define who I am in biblical terms apart from their historical experience."
This unpleasant statement was part pf a broader post regarding missionary activity to Muslims, which I support, however, it seems this inflammatory approach regarding indigenous Christians in the region could do more harm than good. Source: http://9marks.org/article/putting-contextualization-its-place/
The second is the distressing number of instances documented on Wartburg Watch and elsewhere of people having hurtful experiences leaving 9Marks.
http://thewartburgwatch.com/2014/07...ed-in-the-9-marks-view-of-church-resignation/
It is my view that 9Marks should very much back off on the Church Discipline aspect; at some point I fear someone might well be able to accuse these Christians, who are Nicene Christians, of being a cult, based on these practices, and get away with it, which would be an extreme embarassment. I do not regard the PCA or SBC as being cults; I admire the work of the late Rev. Dr. James Kennedy on the subject of cults, as well as that of Al Mohler. What is more, I agree with the social conservativism of the PCA and SBC; 9Marks threatens to upset this, and IMO these denominations would be justified in directing their local churches to disassociate with 9Marks. 9Marks has a slick media presence, rather dramatically nicer than the websites of any Orthodox churches or the Vatican, so it is a pity that they cannot use this presence in a more broadly tolerant manner, and that they are associated with disagreeable practices in terms of church discipline which are attracting not unjusitifiable criticism.
Last edited: