1844 Resolved.

[Adventist Dissident]

I am officially announcing that I have resolved the conflicts over 1844.
1. I can accept and teach that the 2300 days are years and they do tie to the 70 weeks, just in a different way.
2. The prophecy can be understood without using the day-year time principle.
3. And the SDA church is the fulfillment of part of this prophecy.

 

[KevinT]

I'll bite. Tell me your resolution.

KT

 

[Adventist Dissident]

I'll bite. Tell me your resolution.

KT

I am writing it up, but I am moving right now. When I get settled I will tell you.
The announcement was to let people know the major objections to SDAism and the major pillar of SDAism's existence have been reconciled.

to reconcile the prophecy you have to overcome the following objections.
1. Why are the 2300 evenings and mornings not split in half?
2. Can you interpret the time signatures to reach 1844 without importing the day-year principle? the Book of Daniel should tell us how to interpret the numbers. Can
the calculation of years can be deduced by using another method other than day-year.
3. Why is Rome a horn rather than a beast? If you take that Rome is the little horn of Daniel 8 can you account for the missing beast?
4. Can you explain how to reconcile Antiochus and Rome and the Little Horn?
5. Can you explain how to link Daniel 8 & 9, together?
6. What is the significance of the Chazon & Marea?
7. How many visions are in Daniel 8.
8. Can you explain the connection between the vision in Daniel 8, Daniel 9, and Daniel 10-12.
9. Can you explain Why Rome comes from a Greek Goat?
10. Can you explain the Host and the Star and their connection to one another in the meaning of the 2300 days?
11. can you explain the connection between the "cleansing" and "daily"
12. Why does the sanctuary not appear in the Hebrew? It is the general word for "holy things"
13 can you explain Why the Messiah the Prince, are 2 people, not one?
14. How many 70-week prophecies are in Dan 9?
15. Where do you find the time signature for the 1290 & 1335?

 

[KevinT]

I am writing it up, but I am moving right now. When I get settled I will tell you.
The announcement was to let people know the major objections to SDAism and the major pillar of SDAism's existence have been reconciled.

Wow. That is a lot to unpack. I attend a SDA church, and I realize that early church founders put much time and thought into their theories of how to understand Daniel and Revelation. But I have not held them as "gospel truth." I would, however, like to hear your take on this. From reading some of your other posts, I think you also like to think outside the box, and disagree on traditional SDA teaching. That is why I was surprised to hear that you feel there has been reconciliation. Perhaps this was just tongue-in-cheek?

If you want to go through it all with me, could we take it in small bites? No big walls of text please.

KT

 

[Adventist Dissident]

Again, I will write it up at some point, but this is a MAJOR BREAKTHROUGH and affirms the SDA Church. It is the work of almost 20 years so I want to be careful and write it out thoroughly. I want to put the conclusion simi scholarly format.

 

[KevinT]

Excellent. I'll await your writeup. Good luck on the move!

KT

 

[Amo2]

That writeup is taking quite a while. Perhaps the thought was abandoned. Seems like the differences between 2300 days or 2300 years would be hard to reconcile. Apart from that of course, I have no idea what the conflicts referred to are. I certainly have not heard an interpretation of the 2300 day prophecy that makes any more sense than that of the SDA church.

 

[Adventist Dissident]

it is taking awhile. the day year is actually easy. I am taking time because this is a big deal and could change the nature of the denominations approach. I also don't want the ideas stolen.

 

[Amo2]

If the idea is revealed truth from God, it cannot be stolen, it isn't your's or anyone else's. It belongs to God, from whom all truth comes forth. If it is truth from God, and you take to long, He may choose another vessel through whom to reveal it. On the other hand, by all means, take the necessary time to test even your own ideas against the number one standard of holy scripture. God bless your efforts.

 

[Adventist Dissident]

If the idea is revealed truth from God, it cannot be stolen, it isn't your's or anyone else's. It belongs to God,

you are wrong. I did the work. 180 years people have looked at this and drawn the wrong conclusion. they have written books on the matter. they have been rewarded for their efforts. "The worker is worth the wage", scripture says 1 Timothy 5:18.

from whom all truth comes forth. If it is truth from God, and you take to long, He may choose another vessel through whom to reveal it.

sounds like you benefit from the work of others and not compensate them, sounds like stealing and exploitation. that is not how God works.

On the other hand, by all means, take the necessary time to test even your own ideas against the number one standard of holy scripture. God bless your efforts.

sitting with it before I rush to publish, has allowed me to add a few details I did not know before.

 

[Amo2]

No doubt, the longer you sit on it, the more details you will be able to add. Still, no one knows anything of what you have discovered, or the new details you've added. As far as stealing from and exploiting others, I have not ever earned anything from what I have written or shared with others. Nor do I seek to do so. Those works which I have read, learned from, and shared from, were no doubt published with this exact purpose in mind from most authors. Why bother publishing something, if you don't want people to learn from it, and or share it? Money alone I guess. This being aside for reasons of a purely entertainment aspect of course.

 

[Adventist Dissident]

No doubt, the longer you sit on it, the more details you will be able to add. Still, no one knows anything of what you have discovered, or the new details you've added. As far as stealing from and exploiting others, I have not ever earned anything from what I have written or shared with others. Nor do I seek to do so. Those works which I have read, learned from, and shared from, were no doubt published with this exact purpose in mind from most authors. Why bother publishing something, if you don't want people to learn from it, and or share it? Money alone I guess. This being aside for reasons of a purely entertainment aspect of course.

I am almost through with the outline. Then it is on to the writing. As far as money goes, yes I want to get paid. This problem has cost me literally millions of dollars. It has cost the church Billions of dollars. My solution will solve all those problems. Amo2. you don't have a degree in Theology, you have read for enjoyment shared from a desire to learn that is wonderful. That has not been the case for me. I was called into this job, and others will benefit, but I should benefit as well. I have suffered much from these problem and I deserve a reward. Sorry if you think that is selfish, but pastor, teachers and evangelist get paid for what they do. I should as well. This will solve SDA problem forever. They will make much money off this so why don't I get a cut. That is how life works. you eat off my work, I eat off my work. that is only fair.

i will give you a hint. It is about the Sabbath Movement.