• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Search results

  1. Warden_of_the_Storm

    Darwinian evolution - still a theory in crisis.

    I just don't agree with a literal reading of Genesis because God's creation doesn't match up with the Biblical account. And since the Bible was written by man and God's creation cannot lie...
  2. Warden_of_the_Storm

    Darwinian evolution - still a theory in crisis.

    Ah, okay. Thought that I was wrong on something and was prepared to be taught something new.
  3. Warden_of_the_Storm

    Darwinian evolution - still a theory in crisis.

    Do correct me on where I go wrong, but I honestly can't see the distinction between that and what I said.
  4. Warden_of_the_Storm

    Darwinian evolution - still a theory in crisis.

    I miss @Mountainmike
  5. Warden_of_the_Storm

    Darwinian evolution - still a theory in crisis.

    An from what I've seen around here, many people need to remember that door swings both ways.
  6. Warden_of_the_Storm

    Darwinian evolution - still a theory in crisis.

    So really, this thread has gone from MountainMike's bog-standard "Oh, it's not evolution I'm against. It's DARWINIAN EVOLUTION", to a singular Biblical literalist just basically decided to turn the thread into their personal apologetics. Ugh. Doing the same as @Bradskii, I'm unsubscribing from...
  7. Warden_of_the_Storm

    Darwinian evolution - still a theory in crisis.

    Intelligent Design doesn't have any explanatory power. It is the simplest and purest example of post hoc ergo propter hoc - it starts with the premise and then has to work backwards to justify their logic. That is not sound science in any shape or form and is nothing more than religious dogma...
  8. Warden_of_the_Storm

    Darwinian evolution - still a theory in crisis.

    Then you shouldn't be in the science subforum of the website but the philosophy subforum then. And yes, the response can be dismissal because again, this is nothing new and not everything deserves to be given an answer. Because I don't need to respond to them. If science or anyone could...
  9. Warden_of_the_Storm

    Darwinian evolution - still a theory in crisis.

    But there is no argument coming from you worth engaging. It's same old Creationist's Point Refuted A Thousand Times. There is no other reason for science to view anything through naturalism because there is nothing else that science can view anything through. The supernatural, by its very...
  10. Warden_of_the_Storm

    Icons of Evolution

    Egg on my face on that one.
  11. Warden_of_the_Storm

    Icons of Evolution

    If you didn't, then you wouldn't have titled the thread "Icons of Evolution", which heavily implies if not outright says that these are evolution's icons.
  12. Warden_of_the_Storm

    Icons of Evolution

    And I gave my response in post #25.
  13. Warden_of_the_Storm

    Icons of Evolution

    Or maybe I want to stick the general OP topic and not get bogged down in useless arguments about theology.
  14. Warden_of_the_Storm

    Icons of Evolution

    No, it was childish. I'm not the one making the claim that the theory of evolution is irrational, either subjectively or objectively. That is 100% you and you alone, thus the onus on providing evidence is squarely on you only.
  15. Warden_of_the_Storm

    Icons of Evolution

    .... you're going down the "No you!" route? Really? How old are you? ETA: Plus, I think you want me to present evidence that it isn't irrational. I think...
  16. Warden_of_the_Storm

    Icons of Evolution

    That really has nothing to do with the topic at hand so I'm not going to answer it.
  17. Warden_of_the_Storm

    Icons of Evolution

    I find myself focused more on the here and now and the consequences of those rather than things that I will probably not be around to experience.
  18. Warden_of_the_Storm

    Icons of Evolution

    And yet you give me grief for being a quote 'broken record' too... One rule for me and one for thee, eh?
  19. Warden_of_the_Storm

    Icons of Evolution

    No, it's subjectively irrational since it's your opinion. If you want to be seen as objectively irrational, you need to present evidence that is instead of just saying that it is.
  20. Warden_of_the_Storm

    Icons of Evolution

    No, it's more that I know that you're a broken record.
Top Bottom