• With the events that occured on July 13th, 2024, a reminder that posts wishing that the attempt was successful will not be tolerated. Regardless of political affiliation, at no point is any type of post wishing death on someone is allowed and will be actioned appropriately by CF Staff.

  • Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Kamala Harris supported defunding the police in 2020

Merrill

Well-Known Member
Mar 25, 2023
1,163
794
44
Chicago
✟71,527.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married

iluvatar5150

Well-Known Member
Aug 3, 2012
27,588
27,104
Baltimore
✟613,790.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
Before this gets memory-holed, and Democrats start engaging in revisionist history. And this is from CNN

There's nothing wrong with what she's quoted as saying in that article. Re-evaluating spending to see if it matches priorities is a good thing. Heck, one could even argue that it's a conservative thing, since it's in service of optimizing efficiency.

"Defund the Police" had a number of different meaning, or was "semantically overloaded" as one poster here likes to put it. Some just meant cutting police budgets willy nilly. Other, more intelligent, uses of it meant re-evaluating budgets and policies to see if some of the tasks and situations currently assigned to police would be better addressed by other agencies staffed by people with other skillsets. That latter approach is (or at least appears to be from the article) what Harris is describing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bradskii
Upvote 0

Merrill

Well-Known Member
Mar 25, 2023
1,163
794
44
Chicago
✟71,527.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
There's nothing wrong with what she's quoted as saying in that article. Re-evaluating spending to see if it matches priorities is a good thing. Heck, one could even argue that it's a conservative thing, since it's in service of optimizing efficiency.

"Defund the Police" had a number of different meaning, or was "semantically overloaded" as one poster here likes to put it. Some just meant cutting police budgets willy nilly. Other, more intelligent, uses of it meant re-evaluating budgets and policies to see if some of the tasks and situations currently assigned to police would be better addressed by other agencies staffed by people with other skillsets. That latter approach is (or at least appears to be from the article) what Harris is describing.
I don't disagree with everything she said --I do worry about militarized police departments with giant budgets

but she did cheer on the cutting of police budgets, and she pandered to the "defund the police" crowd

the is going to be an election issue, and believe me, Trump is going to remind everyone of this if they have a debate
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Vambram
Upvote 0

eleos1954

God is Love
Site Supporter
Nov 14, 2017
10,632
6,192
Utah
✟789,960.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
I don't disagree with everything she said --I do worry about militarized police departments with giant budgets

but she did cheer on the cutting of police budgets, and she pandered to the "defund the police" crowd

the is going to be an election issue, and believe me, Trump is going to remind everyone of this if they have a debate
There's a lot of policies within this administration that has had effect on America's "norms" ... have they been positive or negative. A few being ...

Defunding the police?
Mass migration?
Wars?

Simple question ... was our country more stable under the Trump administration (of which the 3 listed was not going on) of the Biden administration .... of which Harris of course supported 100%

The democratic party are for these things .... and I don't see anything positive coming out of it.
 
Upvote 0

RileyG

Veteran
Angels Team
Feb 10, 2013
21,465
12,915
29
Nebraska
✟330,728.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Celibate
Politics
US-Republican
There's a lot of policies within this administration that has had effect on America's "norms" ... have they been positive or negative. A few being ...

Defunding the police?
Mass migration?
Wars?

Simple question ... was our country more stable under the Trump administration (of which the 3 listed was not going on) of the Biden administration .... of which Harris of course supported 100%

The democratic party are for these things .... and I don't see anything positive coming out of it.
I agree completely, which is why it is so crucial I’m going to vote to keep Harris out of the White House.
 
Upvote 0

Merrill

Well-Known Member
Mar 25, 2023
1,163
794
44
Chicago
✟71,527.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
and she wants to abolish the filibuster in order to push through the "Green New Deal"

will sign a slavery reparations bill

and supported Biden's plan to prosecute SCOTUS justices, impose term limits on them, and even pack the court

woman is completely nuts
 
Upvote 0

Pommer

CoPacEtiC SkEpTic
Sep 13, 2008
19,609
12,277
Earth
✟183,671.00
Country
United States
Faith
Deist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Democrat
and she wants to abolish the filibuster in order to push through the "Green New Deal"
and this is “bad”?
will sign a slavery reparations bill
my solution, no taxes of any kind will be paid by descendants of slaves for 200 years, I haven’t heard of her “plan” (if it exists)
and supported Biden's plan to prosecute SCOTUS justices, impose term limits on them, and even pack the court
Whatever happened to these plans?

woman is completely nuts
If she agreed with you politically would she be “sane”?
 
Upvote 0

iluvatar5150

Well-Known Member
Aug 3, 2012
27,588
27,104
Baltimore
✟613,790.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
and she wants to abolish the filibuster in order to push through the "Green New Deal"
It's nuts to want to abolish a procedural rule that developed by accident, was mostly used at first to block civil rights advancements, and has stymied everything that can't make it through the budget reconciliation workaround? When was the last time the filibuster worked as advertised by encouraging bipartisanship?
 
  • Agree
Reactions: FireDragon76
Upvote 0

Bradskii

Old age should burn and rave at close of day;
Aug 19, 2018
19,186
13,159
71
Bondi
✟301,345.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
and she wants to abolish the filibuster in order to push through the "Green New Deal"

will sign a slavery reparations bill

and supported Biden's plan to prosecute SCOTUS justices, impose term limits on them, and even pack the court

woman is completely nuts
Don't forget the links! C'mon, do some homework. Tell us where you get your talking points so we can see the context and have an adult conversation.
 
  • Optimistic
Reactions: KCfromNC
Upvote 0

Bradskii

Old age should burn and rave at close of day;
Aug 19, 2018
19,186
13,159
71
Bondi
✟301,345.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
It's nuts to want to abolish a procedural rule that developed by accident, was mostly used at first to block civil rights advancements, and has stymied everything that can't make it through the budget reconciliation workaround? When was the last time the filibuster worked as advertised by encouraging bipartisanship?
'I've got this great idea. To stop legislation going through, you get the floor and hold it by reading through all of Doctor Seuss, War and Peace, and the lyrics of all the Eagles songs'.

'Brilliant. No-one could possible think that it's a remarkably stupid, undemocratic, lunatic suggestion. Let's do it!'
 
  • Like
Reactions: iluvatar5150
Upvote 0

Tropical Wilds

Little Lebowski Urban Achiever
Oct 2, 2009
6,046
4,123
New England
✟231,394.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
and she wants to abolish the filibuster in order to push through the "Green New Deal"

will sign a slavery reparations bill

and supported Biden's plan to prosecute SCOTUS justices, impose term limits on them, and even pack the court

woman is completely nuts

The things people attribute to her without any shred of evidence is nuts.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: FireDragon76
Upvote 0

RileyG

Veteran
Angels Team
Feb 10, 2013
21,465
12,915
29
Nebraska
✟330,728.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Celibate
Politics
US-Republican
and she wants to abolish the filibuster in order to push through the "Green New Deal"

will sign a slavery reparations bill

and supported Biden's plan to prosecute SCOTUS justices, impose term limits on them, and even pack the court

woman is completely nuts
No one alive owned slaves. People are not entitled to special privileges just because of the abuse of their ancestors. Period.

They’re dead.
 
Upvote 0

BPPLEE

Well-Known Member
Apr 13, 2022
12,668
5,158
60
Montgomery
✟184,623.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
The things people attribute to her without any shred of evidence is nuts.
She said she would abolish the filibuster to pass the green new deal. And I have heard her speak about free mental health care and free health care for stress related illnesses as a form of reparations. These are things that she herself has said.
 
Upvote 0

iluvatar5150

Well-Known Member
Aug 3, 2012
27,588
27,104
Baltimore
✟613,790.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
She said she would abolish the filibuster to pass the green new deal.
How did she say that she would accomplish this? Because AFAIK, the filibuster is a senate rule, not a law, and can only be rescinded by the senate itself.
 
Upvote 0

BPPLEE

Well-Known Member
Apr 13, 2022
12,668
5,158
60
Montgomery
✟184,623.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
How did she say that she would accomplish this? Because AFAIK, the filibuster is a senate rule, not a law, and can only be rescinded by the senate itself.
I’ve heard the sound bite a dozen times today. She was a senator wasn’t she?
 
Upvote 0

iluvatar5150

Well-Known Member
Aug 3, 2012
27,588
27,104
Baltimore
✟613,790.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
I’ve heard the sound bite a dozen times today. She was a senator wasn’t she?
Four years ago. Is that the concern - that she would’ve done something differently at her last job if she’d had the chance?
 
Upvote 0

iluvatar5150

Well-Known Member
Aug 3, 2012
27,588
27,104
Baltimore
✟613,790.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
It’s one of the many radical things she’s advocated
How is that radical? The practice only gained frequent use in the 20th century and the rules governing its employment have been changed several times.
 
Upvote 0