• With the events that occured on July 13th, 2024, a reminder that posts wishing that the attempt was successful will not be tolerated. Regardless of political affiliation, at no point is any type of post wishing death on someone is allowed and will be actioned appropriately by CF Staff.

  • Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

KAMALA HARRIS’S RECORD OF ANTI-CATHOLIC BIGOTRY

Michie

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Feb 5, 2002
171,708
59,555
Woods
✟5,097,852.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
In 1958, as John F. Kennedy was preparing to run for president of the United States, polemicist Paul Blanshard published the second edition of his incendiary 1949 book, American Freedom and Catholic Power. This was the bible of anti-Catholicism in American public life. In it, Blanshard called for a “resistance movement” that would oppose the Catholic Church’s “antidemocratic social policies,” and attacked Catholic schools as “the most important divisive instrument in the life of American Children.” Echoing Blanshard’s bigotry, a February 1960 editorial in Christianity Todayasserted that it is “perfectly rational” to oppose the nomination and election of a “Romanist” because “a Catholic presidency would be torn between two loyalties.”

In September 1960, Kennedy, sensitive to the broad public sentiment reflected in these broadsides, gave his famous speech to the Houston Ministerial Association, in which he renounced any claim that his Catholic faith might have on his moral life. Reducing his Catholicism to an accident of birth, Kennedy assured voters that it had no purchase on his political judgment. Sixty years later, Joe Biden and Kamala Harris are, respectively, Kennedy’s religious and Blanshard’s polemicist heirs.

One difference between Blanshard and Harris, of course, is that the former possessed only the power of persuasion, whereas the latter possesses the power (and is campaigning for more) to institutionalize her bigotry against Catholics and public organizations whose practices are consistent with Catholic moral life. And she has wielded it vigorously.

For example, Harris is perfectly willing to impose unconstitutional religious tests to nominees to the federal bench. In 2018, when Brian Buescher was nominated as a District Court judge, Harris put this written question to him:

Continued below.
 

WarriorAngel

I close my eyes and see you smile
Site Supporter
Apr 11, 2005
73,761
9,919
United States Pennsylvania
Visit site
✟538,754.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Private
In September 1960, Kennedy, sensitive to the broad public sentiment reflected in these broadsides, gave his famous speech to the Houston Ministerial Association, in which he renounced any claim that his Catholic faith might have on his moral life. Reducing his Catholicism to an accident of birth, Kennedy assured voters that it had no purchase on his political judgment. Sixty years later, Joe Biden and Kamala Harris are, respectively, Kennedy’s religious and Blanshard’s polemicist heirs.
I did not know, because I was not around, that Kennedy said that.
Of course the abortion issue wasn't a hot topic it did not yet exist as a platform.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: RileyG
Upvote 0

chevyontheriver

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Sep 29, 2015
21,023
17,967
Flyoverland
✟1,181,208.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-American-Solidarity
I did not know, because I was not around, that Kennedy said that.
Of course the abortion issue wasn't a hot topic it did not yet exist as a platform.
He did that at a speech in Texas at the Greater Houston Ministerial Association in 1960. It was widely credited as taking just enough of the edge off Protestant objections to a Catholic president to get him elected. I guess they were OK with a bad Catholic but not an actual believing Catholic. They should have been more concerned with his liberalism than his Catholicism, but such was their concern back then.

I'm not an avid Politico reader but this article was fascinating: https://www.politico.com/news/magaz...stoked-the-rise-of-the-christian-right-123369

Now there was another speech given at that same spot in Houston at Houston Baptist University just a dozen or so years ago by archbishop (shoulda been cardinal) Chaput. He didn't follow the Kennedy approach, and in fact he repudiated it, and he got an impressive ovation from the Baptists for it. Highly worth listening to Chaput in this speech.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WarriorAngel
Upvote 0

Solo81

Active Member
Jan 19, 2024
227
163
44
Gundy
✟37,120.00
Country
Ireland
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Private
He did that at a speech in Texas at the Greater Houston Ministerial Association in 1960. It was widely credited as taking just enough of the edge off Protestant objections to a Catholic president to get him elected. I guess they were OK with a bad Catholic but not an actual believing Catholic. They should have been more concerned with his liberalism than his Catholicism, but such was their concern back then.

I'm not an avid Politico reader but this article was fascinating: https://www.politico.com/news/magaz...stoked-the-rise-of-the-christian-right-123369

Now there was another speech given at that same spot in Houston at Houston Baptist University just a dozen or so years ago by archbishop (shoulda been cardinal) Chaput. He didn't follow the Kennedy approach, and in fact he repudiated it, and he got an impressive ovation from the Baptists for it. Highly worth listening to Chaput in this speech.
Was that Chaput speech called "the vocation of Christians in American Public life"? I have a clip on yt but am wondering if it's the speech you mean.
 
Upvote 0

chevyontheriver

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Sep 29, 2015
21,023
17,967
Flyoverland
✟1,181,208.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-American-Solidarity
Was that Chaput speech called "the vocation of Christians in American Public life"? I have a clip on yt but am wondering if it's the speech you mean.
Exactly. The speech Kennedy should have given but wouldn't have dared to. Things change in 50 years. Forces re-align.
 
Upvote 0

chevyontheriver

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Sep 29, 2015
21,023
17,967
Flyoverland
✟1,181,208.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-American-Solidarity
Liberals hate the faithful. They don’t care about us, their hypocrisy is astounding.
Hillary wanted to send us to re-education camps. I'm sure that thought endures. There is actually a huge religious liberty issue surrounding Kamala, who seems out to get faithful Catholics and ghettoize us. Remembering her questioning of a judicial candidate who was a member of the Knights of Columbus.
 
Upvote 0

RileyG

Veteran
Angels Team
Feb 10, 2013
21,465
12,917
29
Nebraska
✟330,748.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Celibate
Politics
US-Republican
Hillary wanted to send us to re-education camps. I'm sure that thought endures. There is actually a huge religious liberty issue surrounding Kamala, who seems out to get faithful Catholics and ghettoize us. Remembering her questioning of a judicial candidate who was a member of the Knights of Columbus.
I pray they both repent, if not, no, they won’t go to heaven.

Their is nothing worth losing your eternal soul for.
 
Upvote 0

WarriorAngel

I close my eyes and see you smile
Site Supporter
Apr 11, 2005
73,761
9,919
United States Pennsylvania
Visit site
✟538,754.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Private
Hillary wanted to send us to re-education camps. I'm sure that thought endures. There is actually a huge religious liberty issue surrounding Kamala, who seems out to get faithful Catholics and ghettoize us. Remembering her questioning of a judicial candidate who was a member of the Knights of Columbus.
My daughter is quoting [in her 20s] the same thing Hillary started back in the day..
It takes a village to raise a child.
She thinks this is all new, but it's just regurgitated swallop.
Our young uns know everything. They read about it by some slanted ;ne'er do well' and I try to say history is rewritten and they get upset.
SEE what crap the village is teaching??

I watched Kamala call 18-24 year olds stupid.
Said literally - stupid.

And she is playing she is on their side.

I'm still baffled how she is the incumbent without the 'democracy - aka people' voting for that.
If like FORD - she had to be voted for - she would be nixed asap.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RileyG
Upvote 0

tz620q

Regular Member
Site Supporter
Apr 19, 2007
2,711
1,072
Carmel, IN
✟640,612.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
My daughter is quoting [in her 20s] the same thing Hillary started back in the day..
It takes a village to raise a child.
She thinks this is all new, but it's just regurgitated swallop.
Our young people know everything. They read about it by some slanted 'ne'er do well' and I try to say history is rewritten and they get upset.
SEE what crap the village is teaching??

I watched Kamala call 18-24 year olds stupid.
Said literally - stupid.

And she is playing she is on her side.

I'm still baffled how she is the incumbent without the 'democracy - aka people' voting for that.
If like FORD - she had to be voted for - she would be nixed asap.
In a field of pure political animals, Kamala Harris is even worse than Biden. Two things that jumped to my mind happened during the 2020 election. There were a series of interviews before the 2020 election that were shown on 60 Minutes. The Democratic candidates were given softball questions from a media whose sole aim was to make sure Trump did not get reelected. Norah O'Donnell starts with the usual softball questions to Kamala; but ended by stating that Kamala Harris had been ranked as the most liberal senator and how that would align with Joe Biden's more mainstream values. Kamala looked like she had gone to a birthday party expecting gifts only to find out she was the pinata. She stumbled through a denial, saying Mike Pence had called her that. O'Donnell cited the source as GovTrack, a non-paritisan group. Kamala tried to backpedal saying that she had spoken to Joe about this and his wanting her diverse viewpoint. Her answer ended with the sad trope that she was a poor oppressed black woman.

The second story happened during her debate with Mike Pence. Pence asked her if she would take the COVID vaccine when it came out. Harris quibbled that she wouldn't if it was a vaccine developed under Trump. Within 6 months she was behind mandates for others to have to take the vaccine or lose their jobs and was out in the media shaming people who refused to take it.

She will do or say whatever is needed to further her political power. The best thing we should do as voters is not listen to her words; but judge her on her past actions. She has been around long enough for us to judge how she will govern based on her positions and voting record.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

BPPLEE

Well-Known Member
Apr 13, 2022
12,668
5,158
60
Montgomery
✟184,623.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
He did that at a speech in Texas at the Greater Houston Ministerial Association in 1960. It was widely credited as taking just enough of the edge off Protestant objections to a Catholic president to get him elected. I guess they were OK with a bad Catholic but not an actual believing Catholic. They should have been more concerned with his liberalism than his Catholicism, but such was their concern back then.

I'm not an avid Politico reader but this article was fascinating: https://www.politico.com/news/magaz...stoked-the-rise-of-the-christian-right-123369

Now there was another speech given at that same spot in Houston at Houston Baptist University just a dozen or so years ago by archbishop (shoulda been cardinal) Chaput. He didn't follow the Kennedy approach, and in fact he repudiated it, and he got an impressive ovation from the Baptists for it. Highly worth listening to Chaput in this speech.
If Kennedy was running today I don’t think he would be considered liberal.
 
Upvote 0

WarriorAngel

I close my eyes and see you smile
Site Supporter
Apr 11, 2005
73,761
9,919
United States Pennsylvania
Visit site
✟538,754.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Private
If Kennedy was running today I don’t think he would be considered liberal.
RFK Jr was pro life, but switched on it and is pro choice.
Not Catholic speak....
Not popular enough so he is Independent and runs on helping mothers...Which is what Trump is running on.
But he also wants to deny childhood vaccinations.

If we get rid of childhood vaccines, we are done.

Just done.

Our country has maintained legal immigrants with mandatory vaccinations because vaccines only last so long, and in which case herd immunity means we do not have the bacteria in the country anymore.
Now the falsifications of autism vs genetics [they found were conclusive] were a scare tactic so germ warfare - hello.
[NOTE: A child with autism at birth forms many more nerve endings in the brain thus inability to want to be close or look at others]

Small pox vaccine isn't even a thing anymore because it was gone.

Our leaders are a mess. Because the people have been indoctrinated with fear.
 
Upvote 0